I thought it was funny.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord McBuckethead
Printable View
I thought it was funny.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord McBuckethead
It was funny, but of course it is the greatest player to ever play for UM.
Eli dancing with men makes for a great commercial
I would give up a td the next play.
If that is not a td, the nfl needs to change the rule
It has to be, but if I?m Philly I?d rather have first and goal on the one.Quote:
Originally Posted by msstate7
They need to change them anyways. He literally caught the ball at the 5 yard line and the rules are making it questionable if it was a catch because it came out in the endzoneQuote:
Originally Posted by msstate7
This.Quote:
Originally Posted by WeWonItAll(Most)
Why don’t they talk about the PI that wasn’t called on the extra point attemptQuote:
Originally Posted by BeardoMSU
Awe....poor Tom
Thought the game was going to end up almost as scripted ... Brady with over 2 minutes to get a TD ... then he fumbles the ball.
Philadelphia's going to go nuts. They'll probably burn the place down.
Brady is now one of the biggest losers in SB history. He is no Joe Montana
I just caught the tail end of the replay. What the hell was the controversy? Looked to pretty clearly be a catch.Quote:
Originally Posted by WeWonItAll(Most)
Should get ball back with little over min to go down 8. As a saints fan, it not overQuote:
Originally Posted by Coach34
As a Saints fan, it's not over even when time has expired.Quote:
Originally Posted by msstate7
No .. he ain't. Joe don't lose SBs. I'll take Joe any day.Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach34
Almost a Saints repeat.
He just has better stats, won same amount of SBs, and oh, he made 3 more. Brady is better than Montana. Who are the great WRs that have played the majority of their career with Brady?Quote:
Originally Posted by dawgday166
Matt Cassel never started a college game and would have won 3-4 SB's as the Patriot QB.Quote:
Originally Posted by msstate7
Still take Joe.Quote:
Originally Posted by msstate7
Hey, lets not rustle the old timers now.Quote:
Originally Posted by msstate7
You a clown. Cassell started a whole season in 2008 and did not make playoffs. Brady got hurt game 1Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach34
So if in those 3 years that Brady lost a Super Bowl, he'd actually lost in the AFC title game, would you be talking about how clutch he is at 5-0 in Super Bowls?
They were debating whether he was still in the process of making the catch when he dove over the goal line and the ball popped out or if he made the catch and was then a ball carrier. One of the announcers trying to say he was still in the process of making the catch. Apparently you can catch it, run 5 yards and dive into the endzone and the rules still make it questionable if you ever actually caught the ball or notQuote:
Originally Posted by Johnson85
In the 16 seasons in which Brady played, 8 of them ended in the super bowl... 50%. Amazing when you consider another all-time great, Manning was in the AL pretty much the entire time with him
Yes, the best argument for Montana over Brady at this point is to hold it against Brady for actually making it to the Super Bowl.Quote:
Originally Posted by Quaoarsking
Wow, it is 5 wins... I was thinking 4 for some reason.Quote:
Originally Posted by Quaoarsking
Cassel was 11-5 as the Patriots QBQuote:
Originally Posted by msstate7
No playoffsQuote:
Originally Posted by Coach34
11-5 gets you in the playoffs 9/10 timesQuote:
Originally Posted by msstate7
Well that was the one. You said cassel would win Super Bowls, but he missed the playoffs in his shotQuote:
Originally Posted by Coach34
11-5 would be one of Brady's worst seasons -- literally he's gone 12-4 or better in 12 of his 16 seasons as a starter.
So there's no evidence that Cassel could have won any Super Bowls had he been New England's QB since 2001, much less 5, nor played in 8.
Brady missed the playoffs 1 time in his career (2002)
Joe had the greatest receiver in NFL history and John Taylor. Brady has 2 shrimps and one goofy tight end.Quote:
Originally Posted by dawgday166
Roger Craig was pretty good himselfQuote:
Originally Posted by parabrave
Brady is 40 and just threw for 505 yards in the Super Bowl tonight. Not his fault his defense sucks and his best WR got knocked out with a concussion. Dude threw for 505 yards tonight at the age of 40!! GTFO of here saying Montana is better than him. What a ****ing joke. Some of y'all will never say Brady is GOAT no matter what cause you're a HATER. Period. Jealousy is never a good look.
https://media.giphy.com/media/l3E6uh...ylji/giphy.gifQuote:
Originally Posted by Coach34
People have forgotten who Montana's WR's were for his first two Super Bowls- Dwight Clark and Freddie Soloman. A lot of people think that Montana and Rice came on at the same time and that's not true. Brady had a guy that just went into the HOF in Randy Moss yesterday, and I think Gronk is a HOF TE as well. Aaron Hernandez was a terrible human being- but he was also a really good TE/WR/H-Back and probably would have been a HOF had he stayed out of trouble. Troy Brown was a good WR. Wes Welker is one of the best slot WR's in NFL history. Montana only had Rice and Taylor for 1988 and 1989. He also didn't have Roger Craig in 1981 either.
Montana is better. And to me, it's like Hank Aaron being "better" than Babe Ruth...yeah- he hit more home runs but Ruth did it in 16 years while Aaron did it in 22. Montana made it to essentially 50% of the Super Bowls in his career from 1981-1990 because he missed a year or two with injuries. (Half of 1986 and all of 1991 and played one game in 1992.
Here's why Montana is better to me- he is way more mobile than Brady and a lot more clutch. He also was never accused of cheating. But I think if you put Brady in Montana's era...Brady would have gotten beaten up to. You put Joe into today's era with these RPO's and wide open spread offenses plus the fact that he's mobile and they protect QB's...there's no question in my mind Joe would be better.
Or maybe some people have an actual rational reason for it?Quote:
Originally Posted by Dawg61
It's really hard to argue with 4-0 when you are 5-3 and losing to Eli Manning and the Eagles back up QB. Not to mention Brady is a lot closer to being 3-5 than Montana was to ever losing a game.
To be fair, yes. But he's not. That's the point.Quote:
Originally Posted by Quaoarsking