This is incorrect. I'll let you infer as to the real reason why we went with Adidas.
Printable View
Doesn't change the FACT that we were an Easton team first. In case you forgot, EASTON not Adidas, built our infield practice area. We were a huge priority for them, signing to at that time the biggest bat contract on record. Adidas may have given us more, but the fact still remains we left Easton for Adidas. And frankly, I think both suck. Louisville Slugger is the way to go.
LSU and Vandy use DeMarini as best I can tell from TV.
I'm assuming that using Adidas' bats was somehow part of the deal of them making us their #1 baseball school. That may be enough of a negative to have not made the deal worth it, but it's tough to tell.
I have no idea if the bats are better or worse. It definitely isn't that big a difference one way or another.
I tend to slide back and forth on the bat argument based on the most recent observations and analysis, but in the back of my mind I always have trouble believing that in this day and age every company's bat isn't engineered to be as effective as the rules allow.
You need to take that up with Scott. It doesn't matter to me if we're Easton, Louisville Slugger, or DeMarini- we should use a reputable brand whatever it is. And Adidas isn't a reputable brand when it comes to baseball bats.
It's sad that in baseball we put Adidas over what is best for our baseball program- whether that is bats or literally embarrassing uniforms like the practice jersey that was totally unacceptable on so many levels.
And yes, I'm sure that they have been good to us in many ways- but moreso in other sports and maybe the most in basketball. But we're not going to make our basketball team wear Louisville Slugger basketball shoes. Adidas has also done very many unpopular things as well in all of our sports.
And then we get the lame excuses from Scott like "the players like them", "the players think it's more comfortable than the uniforms that the fans like", "we look like those great Phillies teams in the 80's" and "Adidas couldn't make the white version of the throwback uniform in one week",
Contracts aside, does a team have to use the same bat?
Or could they mix and match?
Every team uses the bats they use because of the money they're getting from the bat company.
Agree with every word. If this is how Adidas treats it's #1 baseball school, then screw them. Yeah, they helped us with Howland and seem to be making us a basketball priority. But I'd bet dollars to donuts we'll wind up wearing some clown uniform in basketball now, too. Seems like the more "preferential" treatment we get from Adidas, the worse they are.
nm
Engie, I've talked to a few local coaches and guys that talk to scouts regularly and Im not so sure we have all this "talent" that people think are underperforming. Scouts are telling local coaches that all three schools (USM, MSU, bears) are lacking in MLB talent. The best players on the bears Orvis, Trent, Bramlett, and Weathersby are all college players. Trent may get drafted, but it won't be top 5 rounds.
On our team, I don't see a single player that is a top 5 round pick in this year's class or next years. Some say Gavin Collins, and I know he is hurt, but I don't see an Ed Easley skill set with Gavin.
Maybe there is a pitcher on our team that will progress and be a top 150 pick next year, but I know there isn't one on the roster that is draft eligible this year, and Im not positive there is one for next year either.
I just don't think we are all that talented. In baseball, talented players eventually show up. That is the great thing about baseball. The more talented team ends up on top by the end of the season almost 80% of the time. I just don't see the talent, and I don't think MLB does either.
from pics on google it looks like A&M is using easton
So apparently we are one of the very few Adidas schools actually willing to use Adidas bats.