you won a Super Bowl as a standout CB for one of the most prestigious NFL franchises in history?
That's pretty awesome.
Collins said he was the best dl coach he'd ever been around.
Turner isnt your average joe.
That may be true to and heard some of that before. Mainly posters believe Wilson was more liked than Turner, the degree the players liked one over the other, I don't know. It seems for sure that Wilson is the better recruiter and Turner the better DL coach. When it comes to coaches in the trenches, I had rather have the better coach than recruiter. Other positions I think differently but line coaches need to be good coaches, teachers of the game, command respect from their players. Likability is also down the list. Obviously, you would love to have a coach with all of it but if not go with a good coach first and get him help recruiting.
It is official per CDM tweet. Will be interesting to say the least. My big question is will it help improve our db coverage and reduce the number of big pass plays against us? That seemed to be our major weakness ( duhh!!!) and the deciding factor in the EB, also kept the winning margins from truly reflecting our play in at least 4 of our wins and maybe led to some lack of confidence on the team overall against Bama and tsun ( not much but a little bit can hurt and make a difference ).
It's two more years than you have. So yeah jackass he is still more qualified than you. With NO experience he would be more qualified than you but he actually had two years prior to coming here as an assistant with the Arizona Cardinals.
ETA: It's the absurdity that you are on his coaching level not whether or not he is ready to be a DC. That was what your original post stated that is getting you called out. Nobody was pushing him for the position.
He carried a Cardinal clipboard. He came to State to learn to coach. Take me, the jackass out of the coaching equation, Townsend is not qualified to be DC. Kirby and Nick are not NFL standouts. How in the hell did they become great defensive coaches? Townsend, our DC? Really Clark?
Well you were the one that put yourself on his level. Your original post had nothing to do with comparing him with other coaches. Nobody said he was on par with those coaches. And I wasn't the only one to make fun of you for it.
Just so a Jackass can understand, nobody, myself included said he was ready or wants him as our DC. But the option was between him or you. We choose him.
Jesus Christ, he is not actually saying that he is as qualified as DT to be the DC. He is using hyperbole to say that he doesn't think that DT is anywhere close to being qualified to be the DC of an SEC team. And based on DT's resume alone, that is not dumb at all.
I don't this an audition for Deshea or an indication of Turner.
Mullen said it was a fairly obvious decision to hand the play-calling over to Townsend, as he didn't want to pull defensive backs coach Tony Hughes from his normal spot in the booth and said David Turner would have his hands full with overseeing substitutions along the defensive line.
yeah -- I get that Deshea here is not ideal. What I don't get is that anyone else on staff is a damn bit more ideal....
It wasn't that we didn't understand the hyperbole, it was an unwarranted post. One person was speculating on whether or not this was an audition for the DC position. Nobody was stating he was ready or wanting DT for the position. All we know is he is calling plays for the bowl game. That's it. It was a jackass statement that had no bearing on the original point of the thread or the question that was raised. And you got called out for it by multiple people.
Damn, can we just play the game already so we can see?