I figured we were down the road on getting someone if they are getting ready to announce Hutzler's dismissal.
Printable View
David Turner the recruiter was one of the best finders of diamonds in the rough back in the day. Unfortunately the game and recruiting has passed him by, because he was still under the old impression that he could do "My way or the highway" type of recruiting and be perfectly honest with them.
The modern game, more importantly recruiting in the NIL era, just passed him. He did great work for us from 07-09 and again from 13-15. He grinded his ass off in some recruitments (Fletcher, Pernell, Boyd, etc) in those early years and was not going to be outworked for Jeffrey Simmons.
Saw where Steve Robertson chimed in. He says it's a little early to say it's for certain and that he has a chance to stay at Virginia Tech under Franklin. That would just be odd to me. However, he says that there is another candidate whose name we know that will take it if offered. I'm only assuming that's Wilcox.
I think some coaches are waiting for the LSU domino to fall with Baker most likely going to Tulane as HC.
Bounds and his buddy at CFB Matrix Bartoo also thought Barbay was some offensive genius and praised our boosters for hiring him.
Come to think of it asking Hutzler to be our ST coach kind of sort of is like Virginia Tech asking Brent Pry to be their DC.
Not really. You still have a coordinator title at that role. You're just coordinating another group. Whereas, Pry would be going from HC with total control of everything in the program to only one part. It would be wild if a guy takes ANOTHER job from the same people who hired him to run the program but said he sucked at that.
Here is a thought.
What DC can bring the most needs with him. Is the Pry, Wilcox, Armstrong...etc.
I don't really know what you're considering needs. If you're talking players then none of them are going to really bring a ton of SEC talent with them outside of a player here and there.
If you're considering coaching a need or scheme a need then that depends on what scheme you want to see.
If I hear a DC say that he doesn't have an identity for his defense and that he does a "Multiple or flexible" style of defense, I might have an aneurysm.
We need a DC that can talk people into wanting to play for him. Thats all it comes down to
This is why I keep bringing the tackling in space point. Good defenders can tackle in space. It's just flat out talent. That's not really something that's coached. As we have watched for 2 years now- we cant tackle in space very well at all. Untill we get those guys at LB and in the Secondary- defense is going to suffer
Rosebowl stated that Pry will make a decision on his future today. I guess if Pry turns us down we pivot to Armstrong.
I think Wilcox is being deliberate about where / if he coaches next year. We was HC at Cal for a while and doesn't have to rush anything.
Interesting. I said in another thread, I think I prefer Armstrong.
Armstrong is also from York, AL, which is about an hour and a half from Starkville.
Robertson?s latest update says that they aren?t optimistic that Pry takes it.