Or maybe this is a different league with a different set of challenges and you have to adjust.
Printable View
There also isn?t a ?check with me? BS every single play. Line up and go.
JOMO is/was decent offensive coach. Needs elite playmakers for his schemes to work. He is a people pleaser at heart, and that?s to his detriment as a head coach.
Oregon actually underachieved this year. They lost to their rival and were projected a top 10 team. I wouldn?t really call that successful
And look how Leachs O did/ I was talking to this OM Players dad a few years ago. He told me that once when they played a Midwest Cornfed team that an opposing players dad told him that they had never seen such speed as they had with OMs Defense. That's the difference between the defenses in the country.
Just curious, because I?m seeing a common theme in this thread, what offense is consistently better with inferior talent?
I don't know that anyone ever said JoMo's offense can't work when he has a good passing QB with competent WRs. I mean it worked in the Big 10 which is a pretty good league. Unfortunately, Mullen didn't leave him with those components at MSU and he was too stubborn to adjust to a run based offense. However, all that said, JoMo is always going to be more successful when he is not the one setting the culture of the program. Players will never have respect for a HC that provides no discipline and work ethic. They may like him but they will never respect him.
Maybe Mario Cristobal (Saban protege) as HC = Discipline/fitness/toughness.
JoMo doesn't have to worry about those aspects ... just has to call plays and focus on offense. Might make a difference.