I like him. Like what he did at Temple. He's a very good motivator too. We could do a whole lot worse IMO.
Printable View
I'm on board with that ... Can't blame Collins for not wanting to work for Don ..., no DC wanted to - not even Grantham tho he followed him to Florida and I think he waited to see if we were offering him a shot at HC here before accepting Mullen's offer down there ..... bottom line is Collins is a good coach and recruiter - GA Tech has much higher entry standards than a lot of other schools so apparently he's recruiting smarter guys as well
GT doesn't have any higher entry standards for their athletes then any other NCAA institution - that's a myth put out by GT people as an excuse. They have had some presidents who capped the number of football players who fell below the basic GT requirements. That has changed a number of times over the years depending upon the president. However, they are limited by degree offerings, and that can impact recruiting and retention.
Totally agree - but if I was Collins I don't leave GA Tech for us unless the money is insane.
He has got a great gig - and there is very little pressure. Moving to the SEC West now is just so damn hard. With A&M emerging the job is just so tough. I think more and more coaches are going to take the Cutcliffe approach. Find a basketball school or a school that doesn't take football that seriously - get them to be average to slightly above average and try and have a big year every 4-5 years. Schools like Indiana, Ga TEch, Duke, and Virginia are such great jobs right now. Modest success can equal a 10-15 year coaching gig. In the SEC that is unthinkable.
May just be my personal preference, but the idea of being able to build my program and have more than 2-3 years sounds appealing to me.
The sec should let them back in.
I think part of it was jealousy. Some of it was frustration on Dan's part. He'd struggled for years to get consistency on the Defensive staff and side of the ball and Collins bails on him. Of course we know the rest of that story with Sirmon, Diaz and Grantham.
I think GC has to prove himself as a coach this year. Shouldn't be hard improving in their record from this past year. Only thing with him is that he knows how tough it is in the SEC. Moorhead learned the hard way. I think that it would be tough pulling him over but I also think our ties to him could allow us to if it really did come to that.
On another note, isn't the assistant AD at GT a Mississippi State alumni?
One year isn't enough to determine if someone will work considering all the rules the NCAA gives with limiting the coaching of players. It's really difficult for a new coach to come in and have the players learn, run through, and really grasp the playbook in one year with the limited time they have now. However after a year of learning and playing, you should have a better view. I think that's one major reason a lot of people waited until this year to question Moorhead. That being said, I think we'll know how good GC can be next year by how much improvement his team makes.
I think he sucks- Straight up suuuucckss. But, the ACC is a joke, so he can be a middle of the pack coach at GT. He likes to recruit, that's the only positive with him. Again, wouldn't spit on him and he deserved every ass chewing he took from Dan Mullen.
He is not a good coach. He is also not a bad good. Very great value-ish. Diaz on the other hand is a shit coach in over his head.