I don?t care if he played 39 minutes. The quote was he couldn?t handle playing off the bench. Obviously, that wasn?t true against Bama. The quote was not he cannot handle playing a limited number of minutes.
Printable View
Hey you numbnuts listen to me. Tuesday night if we score more points than Bama we will win. If we don?t we will lose. - C34
Lamar started games in the nonconference and was horrible. He told you himself tonight after the game the reason he is playing so much better now, and it has nothing to do with the fact that he is starting. It?s actually the inverse-the reason he is starting now is because he changed his whole approach to the game and got his stuff straight, off the court and on it.
When I said starting, I essentially meant getting the majority of minutes. I think he played like he did early because he wanted to average 20 a night and get back in the starting lineup. If he was starting back in early January, I think he would have played different. Just my opinion.
A month ago I didn't say Peters should never be the starter I said he shouldn't and didn't deserve to start over Carter THEN because Carter just had a 35 point game and Peters got himself suspended twice. You don't bench Carter then for a guy coming off a double suspension. That's how you lose your entire team. That's a move Stansbury would make not Howland. Got to earn your way back into the starting lineup. Peters did that and now Carter isn't all butthurt about it where he would have been if you put Peters immediately back into the starting lineup. Don't create cancer when you can just wait a month and cancer won't be created.
Alright. To be fair, 34 has been saying Peters should be starting for a while. It was obvious, but he has been saying it.
And Einstein I?m asking you why that was the situation. Why was Lamar suspended? Why wasn?t he starting? Subsequently why wasn?t he getting 1st team minutes to get in gear. You didn?t answer the question as usual. You answered what you thought was asked. I?d rather have a totem pole on the court vs Lamar 3+weeks ago.
That?s like saying after a guy goes 20-30 after a 10-200 slump that you knew he was gonna come through.
Holy shit, we aren?t that stupid. Well at least I?m not. Playing a player struggling mentally and subsequently physically on the court is not a good idea for anyone. The fact you tout it is scary. Hell I can predict that that any player who starts hitting 9 of 10 from mid range will get more playing time.
No one can predict what Lamar was going to go. We all knew his potential. We all saw his sloppy selfish play. We all knew he could be who he?s been the last 2 weeks, if he got his head in straight. Nobody, including Lamar knew if this would occur
So what the f*ck exactly did you predict? Did you predict that water is wet? And that fire is hot?
You might be able to dupe most posters, but you aren?t bringing your F*cking bullshit here. I’ll post you up, Mutombo style.
Fun watching a young team getting better. Starts on defense, we are a good defensive team and known we are sharing the ball and not turning it over as much.
Is Ado a true freshmens? The way he's startling to develop offensively is making me wooly. That plus if Peters continuous to go off, these youngsters could dance this year. If we beat bammer Tue, I'll somewhat start to expect it. At the beginning I was just hoping for the NIT, so yeah, include in the Goal Post Movers club.