Rumors making the rounds this morning

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by YoungB

Was RR lawsuit only an attempt to get the NCAA's cards on the table before the COI?

---

Sounds like RR had no idea they were on Candid Camera

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hrdawg82

Who is already talking punishments? Not saying they wont get that because they certainly deserve it, but if the hearing ended yesterday how are they already discussing bowl bans?

---

My guess would be Keenum, Sankey, and NCAA officials

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bully13

Question: anybody know the difference between "immunity" and "limited immunity" re 39? At first it was just immunity then the ole miss writers started throwing the "limited" version out there. Any significance or just more rebel bullshit?

---

I believe the limited part means he has immunity for anything related to this investigation whereas full immunity would absolve of him any violation that may have happened regardless of the school or situation.

Shitbirds got ****ed

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kyper

The NCAA had Kobe Jones video his Rebel Rags experience. Game Over

---

IF said video does exist, would not Rebel Rags immediately drop their lawsuit? I think the motion to dismiss the suit will be heard on 9/25.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Westdawg

We all remember when the rumor went around this past recruiting cycle about the NCAA doing a "sting" on Rebel Rags.
Elitedawgs was first to break that news...
Guess what?? Ding ding ding. Word I got was that OM began to give rebuttal to Rebel Rags allegations.....and that's when the NCAA shared their video evidence from that "sting".
SILENCE in the room 😶😶😶😶😶
😱😱😱😜😜😜😆😆😆😆😆😆

Want to know why it all ended a full day early plus ending early yesterday ?? There's your answer, folks.

Rue, my fellow EDs, rue 😁😁😁😁😁

---

Epicness

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kyper

The NCAA had Kobe Jones video his Rebel Rags experience. Game Over

---

So what you are saying is the NCAA wired Kobe?

I thought the NCAA couldn't spring new evidence on OM at the COI. It would be epic if they did, but I doubt they whipped out anything OM hadn't heard or seen. It might be BIGGER than anything they'd ever heard or seen, but I'll bet it wasn't new.

The CL guy, Antonio, told H2H the OM reps were prepared to go the full two days of rebuttal but everything was ended yesterday by the middle of afternoon by the COI.

They got their asses busted in front of the COI. Meeting adjourned.

You're 17'd shitbirds.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jack Lambert

So what you are saying is the NCAA wired Kobe?

---

I'm fairly certain they did the same with Scarborough from Bama in 15 and Brennan from LSU this past recruiting season. Anyone remember him opening his commitment, visiting with them and then committing back to LSU within a short period. As soon as he opened up Bucky and Booster headed doen to Bay St. Louis and withing a few days he was back committed to LSU.

Those dumb bastards fell for it bait and switch.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kyper

The NCAA had Kobe Jones video his Rebel Rags experience. Game Over

---

While i would love that to be true, noway, if it existed, are we just now hearing of that. Something like that would have been eluded to in the NCAA response

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spiderman

While i would love that to be true, noway, if it existed, are we just now hearing of that. Something like that would have been eluded to in the NCAA response

---

This.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jack Lambert

So what you are saying is the NCAA wired Kobe?

---

No. Kobe just video'd some of his time while he was at RR getting apparel.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by YoungB

Was RR lawsuit only an attempt to get the NCAA's cards on the table before the COI?

---

It was done solely for the purpose of demonizing and vilifying Leo and Kobe to distract from everything else in the NOA. If they were lying, then RR would have nothing to to fear from the NCAA and the business and the owner could remain boosters so why file a lawsuit if you are innocent and will proven so without one?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mjoelner34

It was done solely for the purpose of demonizing and vilifying Leo and Kobe to distract from everything else in the NOA. If they were lying, then RR would have nothing to to fear from the NCAA and the business and the owner could remain boosters so why file a lawsuit if you are innocent and will proven so without one?

---

OM couldn't sue them, the RR lawsuit is a de facto OM vs Lewis, Jones, Miller lawsuit. Merkel doesn't take this case for damn RR. He did it to help OM

Why wouldn't this info been presented in the NOA as evidence?

[QUOTE=Spiderman;801581]OM couldn't sue them, the RR lawsuit is a de facto OM vs Lewis, Jones, Miller lawsuit. Merkel doesn't take this case for damn RR. He did it to help OM[/QUOTE

Merckel wasn't aware of the video. When it became known- the date was moved until after the COI met to make sure it was legit. OM has been getting played in this all along

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ckDOG

Why wouldn't this info been presented in the NOA as evidence?

---

Allegations are in the NOA- not every speck of evidence.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pollodawg

I thought the NCAA couldn't spring new evidence on OM at the COI. It would be epic if they did, but I doubt they whipped out anything OM hadn't heard or seen. It might be BIGGER than anything they'd ever heard or seen, but I'll bet it wasn't new.

---

they couldn't bring up evidence that brought NEW ALLEGATIONS, but they are more than able to give further evidence which verifies what was already in the NOA.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Doggie_Style

IF said video does exist, would not Rebel Rags immediately drop their lawsuit? I think the motion to dismiss the suit will be heard on 9/25.

---

Exactly. If this is true, we should see the suits dropped very soon.