The Bears are setting themselves up for some issues in Oxford. Patterson and Daddy Patterson will want to throw the ball 30+ times. The paid for WR's will want touches. Akers will want 20 touches per game. There's only one football to go around.
Printable View
The Bears are setting themselves up for some issues in Oxford. Patterson and Daddy Patterson will want to throw the ball 30+ times. The paid for WR's will want touches. Akers will want 20 touches per game. There's only one football to go around.
They're gonna air it out with or without AkersQuote:
Originally Posted by Jacksondevildog
Why the hell would you want him to go to LSU?Quote:
Originally Posted by HoopsDawg
In 2016 SHSU offense was 45% run to 55% pass. Of that 45% run, only about 50% was by the RBs.
B/C LSU is always going to have a beast RB and I want to get Clyde Edwards-Helaire. I think he flips to us if they get Akers.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vandelay Industries
I was reading on Tiger droppings and some think lsu is getting Travis etienne and that Clyde will de-commitQuote:
Originally Posted by HoopsDawg
[QUOTE=HoopsDawg;677140]B/C LSU is always going to have a beast RB and I want to get Clyde Edwards-Helaire. I think he flips to us if they get Akers.[/QUOTE
Ah Ok. Would still rather him go to FSU, looks like CEH is already looking around
He basically already did by saying that he is looking around. Aeris, Nick and Kylin are similar runners so a change of pace like Helaire would be a nice get for us. But it is so critical that we sign Racey McMath and get him in school or find another over-looked guy like Bear. I'm really concerned about our outside receivers long term.Quote:
Originally Posted by msstate7
If the national guys are picking FSU, then it seems like they need to read ED more according to the crystal balls here
The national guys don't actually know who the boosters are like some of the Ole Miss media does. The fan site guys know who is being taken care of. I'll be shocked if it's FSU tomorrow.
As already was mentioned in the thread, the national guys seemed to know what was up with Treadwell, Nkemdiche, Tunsil, ect. Not sure why it would be any different just because the prospect in question is in-state.
Bc LSU will have a good RB with or without Cam. Om, not so much.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vandelay Industries
I believe he'd have less impact (vs MSU) if he were at Bammer as opposed to LSU...Quote:
Originally Posted by preachermatt83
he'd play ST for a couple years, maybe feature one year in TTown, then be gone... or he'd get processed to a SECE team/JUCO/non-P5 team...
You looking out for us I see **** You crack me up. With closet fans like you .... LOL.Quote:
Originally Posted by TUSK
Who cares. Ole Miss could sign the #1 team in the nation and we would still finish ahead of them in the SEC like 95% of the time since Mullen has been here. If Akers wants to throw his college career away and negatively impact his NFL future that's on him. If he chooses that then that tells me everything I need to know about him. It seems to be a pattern for Ole Miss athletes.
How a parent of a talented athlete could be SO short sighted to send there child to Ole Miss is mind blowing. One has only to look at recent history to understand this.
I hate you. One day Saban will be gone. If you guys make the wrong hire it will be back to only winning 9-10 games per year.Quote:
Originally Posted by TUSK
They're (latest big time recruit) different. Hell, Rick Cleveland declared Akers better than than Dupree. Hugh K probably has an article ready to go that declares Akers better now than Barry sanders in his primeQuote:
Originally Posted by Dawgology
Haha ... ole Tusk is aight. He do like to rub a little salt in our wounds from time to time tho. The smug bastard *****Quote:
Originally Posted by HoopsDawg
Bout like Florida post-urbanQuote:
Originally Posted by HoopsDawg
Just thinkin' of ya, buddy....*Quote:
Originally Posted by dawgday166