Interesting, UNC scheduled to go before NCAA for "Procedural" hearing...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bubb Rubb

No....he can still coach - it's easiest to do so if the coach stays at the institution where he was employed when he got the show cause. Other schools can hire a coach with a show cause, but if the allegations are serious enough, the school understands that they may have to share some of the penalties if they hire him. Also, they would be on the radar and would be punished more severely if that coach committed violations while being employed there.

So the short answer is that it's next to impossible that a school would hire a coach with a show cause in place, but not necessarily a slam dunk that a school would fire a coach over a show cause, since they are already serving penalties in the first place. But the coach is certainly still employable. A school just has to "show cause" as to why they want to hire the coach and understand the risks and exposure that comes with it.

Well that's just pretty dang glorious as we may get to watch the Beav wallow in his misery of a mess that he, himself, helped to create.

If this does become the case and he keeps his job, then the odds increase significantly imo for TCUN to become repeat offenders soon down the NCAA road because a leopard can't change its spots.

They won't change as long as they have a program. It won't matter who the coach is. This really isn't about Freeze. He just works there.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Random Poster

Absolutely no way. Show cause means he cant coach.

Not exactly. It means the school has to go before the NCAA and show cause as to why any sanctions/penalties that were imposed individually to the coach shouldn't follow him to a new job. Auburn hired Pearl with a couple months left on his.