So does anybody know the actual truth about Fitz and the team? Is he really not like or is that a rumor? I've heard he's had some off the field issues but nothing in detail
So does anybody know the actual truth about Fitz and the team? Is he really not like or is that a rumor? I've heard he's had some off the field issues but nothing in detail
I think the only thing we learned Saturday is Williams is not the starter. He is the only one who got enough PT to make a judgement....and he couldn't threaten a shitty USA enough to stretch the field at all, and he couldn't beat them.
If we can't beat a USA missing 3 DL starters, with a dink & dunk QB with marginal running skills...who are we going to beat?
No...like TBone, SGD & Confucius said....put Fitz in there (and tell him he is starting and getting at least the first 1/2), then give Tiano a quarter or so.
Also, give Fitz 75% of the snaps this week, and Tiano the remaining 25%.
Process of elimination. Williams is not the answer.
I was more referring to the offense Dan ran with Dak. Dan even mentioned Damian was going through his progressions better than Nick and he felt the offense was rolling better under Damian so he stuck with him. Just because Nick didn't go through all the progressions doesn't mean that isn't the offense we were running on Saturday. If Nick is slow through progressions then you run the Relf offense of 1 or 2 checks then run.Quote:
Originally Posted by Really Clark?
Yeah, probably should just quit delaying the inevitable and go with Tiano. I think we are going to struggle at QB until Key Thompson is a redshirt sophomore.
If our game plan for fitz was to call pass plays that require him to go through numerous progressions then we're doing it wrong. He ain't dak as a senior. He's much more dak as a sophomore or relf as a jr. Mullen over-complicates stuff.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tbonewannabe
Williams failed us by not getting the ball in the endzone in the second half. Not sure why the drives stalled, but they did. I did like Williams running the two minute at the end of the game. Great job there. I'm not sure what's wrong with Fitz but I'm hoping he can get it cleaned up. Point is that you've got to score to win. Didn't like the way we threw away the first two drives of the game. Hurtful loss but glad we're not throwing in the season towel like we did after we lost the opener to La. Tech. Doubt we can get a true freshman out there right away. If we can and he's all that, do it. Otherwise, Williams needs to be more agressive at pushing the ball downfield or Fitz needs to get his head on the field where it belongs. One or the other.
Yeah, I will repeat what others said. I don't think we gave Fitz enough opportunities. Maybe he did lock on his first read and/or didn't make correct reads. Mullen knows if he did or didn't. But the play calling was definitely more of the Dak offense rather than the Relf offense. SO, I don't think Mullen gave Fitz the best opportunity to succeed. I want to see Fitz given the opportunity to run the Relf offense before I call him a bust.
Tiano......if Mullen feels Fitz can't handle the pressure and is making the wrong reads, you need to go with Tiano now. WHy wait for Umass week? He will need to get some snaps under his belt now to ensure his best effort by UMass week. But this is just what I think should happen. Obviously, Dan thinks Williams is more than capable.
What probably will happen...... Williams starts this weekend. The game is within a TD one way or the other. Dan says Williams did just fine. Williams is the QB going forward. LSU will beat us 42-0, btw.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tbonewannabe
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taog Redloh
Some of you need to get up to date on current offenses. Fitz misread the end and gave the ball to holloway inside. If he keeps it he is still running. Our fan base hasn't evolved with the offenses today.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tbonewannabe
His six plays nothing happen and then Williams came in and we moved the ball. Maybe Mullen should have given him another shot but when the qB you send in starts moving the offense you stick with him.Quote:
Originally Posted by ShotgunDawg
I had no problem sticking with Williams in the 1st half but Damian didn't set the world on fire in the 2nd half. Dan or Brian Johnson should have been talking to Fitz on the sideline or at halftime and then give him another shot. Instead we let Damian lead a couple of drives that at most results in FGs. That isn't having the offense rolling, that is shitting the bed against a mediocre at best Sunbelt team.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Lambert
Why did Dan do this, he wanted to play Williams b/c he is the upperclassman..Quote:
Originally Posted by Tbonewannabe
Mullen did give him another shot...let him go back in and take a knee right before half.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Lambert
True, did anyone notice if Aeris, DLee, Gibson, or Murphy were out there also? No wonder Dan doesn't give them a chance, instead of running the offense we just wasted clock by taking a knee.Quote:
Originally Posted by Interpolation_Dawg_EX
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tbonewannabe
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taog Redloh
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tbonewannabe
That's bullshit. Williams got the same play calls as Fitz, he just made the better read and moved the ball.Quote:
Originally Posted by fishwater99
With that being said I don't think williams is our qb, but I don't fault Dan for not pulling him Saturday.
Anyone know how Fitz is thought of on campus?Quote:
Originally Posted by Taog Redloh
Not sure about that, but what a dick move by Mullen....talk is that D Lee has an ankleQuote:
Originally Posted by Tbonewannabe
Here's my only observation from a practice and game standpoint so take it however you will. I am a veteran. A proud one at that. And when I go to battle the guy leading me doesn't have to be the most liked guy. But he does has to be the most prepared guy. So blame Dan and blame Damien all you want. The problem isn't them. The problem is Fitz just won't step up and take control of HIS team. Until that light comes on its not a Mullen or Williams problem. It's a Nicky Fitz problem
Regarding the Relf-offense:
For those more in the know than myself, is that something that can be implemented now that the season has started, or should we have been practicing that in Spring/Fall camp for it to be a legitimate strategy this year? Given how much Mullen still wanted to pass and use the wrong RBs for situations, I'm guessing we didn't practice much of that style in the off-season...
We are really between a rock and a hard place. We are limited with Williams no doubt but he apparently is the more settled, mature QB. People forget that although Fitz has been on campus almost as long as Williams, he only started ONE year as a QB in HS. I think he even played a different position up until his SR year. Still very green for a guy trying to start in the SEC but he no doubt has much better overall potential than Williams. We may have lost this past Saturday with Fitz playing as well but long term I believe we would have gotten more positives out of it because Fitz desperately needs game reps moreso than Williams does.Quote:
Originally Posted by WinningIsRelentless
I'm not saying fitz isn't better than Williams, I think he has more upside for sure. However, we ran the first play of the game to his strength and he read it wrong or he'd still be running....he's the better runner of the two by far and he didn't capitalize on it. Now 6 plays shouldn't and won't be his end, but he failed on those 6. Drops be damned.Quote:
Originally Posted by ShotgunDawg