When is the next article on the OM thing going to be released? Anybody have an idea? We heard something about an article supposed to be released like last week or so, and they were holding back because of the Baylor stuff. What's the latest?
Printable View
When is the next article on the OM thing going to be released? Anybody have an idea? We heard something about an article supposed to be released like last week or so, and they were holding back because of the Baylor stuff. What's the latest?
Let's remember that Ole Miss filed its NOA response in April, then told the public they had a 30 day extension to wait until late May.
THIS WAS A LIE.
No request for extension was made. No request for extension was granted. Ole Miss had already filed their response while they were telling the public that they were getting a delay.
You can't believe a damn thing Ole Miss says in regards to their investigation. They have REPEATEDLY lied to the public. Denied there was an investigation. Denied there was a NOA. Ignored FOIA requests. Hid the NOA from public view until they finally responded to the NCAA about it. Lied about the seriousness of the NOA. Lied about the number of allegations in the NOA. Lied about there being a 30-day extension to respond to the NOA. Lied, lied, lied.
Ole Miss has told more lies than truths regarding their investigation.
Elitedawgs, national writers, and Steve Robertson have been the ONLY reliable sources in these matters.
#
NCAA website lists the dates they meetQuote:
Originally Posted by spbdawg
Ole Miss has lied about a lot of things, and they may have lied about who asked for the 30-day extension, but I don't think you're correct about there never being one. It seems quite clear there was one granted, and that UNM responded approx 30 days later.Quote:
Originally Posted by PassInterference
We should be careful to not throw out accusations that aren't true, lest they call into question the validity of our claims on the stuff we do know about. Give their fans an inaccurate statement within a slew of facts, and they'll seize on the one error and tell the world they have proof all the stuff we post are lies, then cite the one example.
Where did this come from? And why? #never HillaryQuote:
Originally Posted by Reason2succeed
#
How was one granted? OM responded within the 90 days. Its up to them as when to release their response- its not NCAA mandated. The 30 day extension would have allowed them to file after the 90 day deadline- it had nothing to do with their releaseQuote:
Originally Posted by blacklistedbully
Perhaps I'm unclear on the facts. Was not their original deadline to respond in April, and did they not announce someone had asked for a 30 day extension, and did they not then issue their response a month later?Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach34
Y'all know me, You know I LOVE to antagonize that delusional bunch of morons as much as I honestly can. I just draw the line at willfully posting stuff I know not to be true. I'm not saying that's what others are doing here, but I am asking if there is something I am missing here, because I haven't heard or read anything on this particular topic that suggests they were lying on this point.
Believe me...if there's yet another lie to add to the ever-growing list of lies that abomination of institution has tallied, I'd welcome the ammunition to use against those morons, particularly on Rivals.com.
Educate me.
The 30 day extension is for the OM response. There is no 30 day extension I'm aware of when OM has to publicize their response. Hell, they responded 35 days later. It was just another lie. They didnt delay their response 30 more days- they responded to the NCAA within the 90 day window.Quote:
Originally Posted by blacklistedbully