That's one thought I have on them too. If they just keep cheating, and the NCAA keeps investigating, they may think then they won't get in trouble...and they gotta keep delaying in there somewhere too!Quote:
Originally Posted by PassInterference
That's one thought I have on them too. If they just keep cheating, and the NCAA keeps investigating, they may think then they won't get in trouble...and they gotta keep delaying in there somewhere too!Quote:
Originally Posted by PassInterference
Three coaches under his leadership get a show cause and he won't?
The noose went around his neck draft night. Shit got real. Plus, the national sports media is all over this now and they're not showing Freeze any sympathy. He'll get a show cause but it'll be early next year right before signing day.
I don't expect a show cause for Freeze from this first NOA. However, I am thinking he will be suspended for 1 to 3 games, probably some recruiting restrictions too.
If there had been some academic fraud allegations under Freeze then he would get the show cause.
Who knows what all the addendum or 2nd NOA will bring to light.
I do think the scholarship hit will be substantial, just from this 1st NOA, in the range of 18-25.
This blurb from the "Aggravating Factors" indicates they are not playing.
http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/attac...458194&thumb=1
Which is what makes this whole thing so complicated and hopefully what causes them to fry. Continuing at the level they were (staff paying players. I'm sure tunsil wasn't the only one.) while being investigated is a special kind of dumb/arrogant that the NCAA isn't used to dealing with.Quote:
Originally Posted by PassInterference
This is what I have been wondering also. If the first is out, and here comes another, wouldn't that be a repeat offender status? Or would they just stack some more on those bitches? Makes me think that they have to get hammered hard at some point. There is definately a pattern. Loss of institutional control.Quote:
Originally Posted by Saltydog