I don't agree. ..I'm not an insider, just thinking about how all this works and I don't think coaches have that much control of their program's network. .could be wrong but I don't think so
Printable View
You'd be wrong. Just look to Ole Miss. Pound for pound, they are doing it better than anybody.
The only team he hasn't beaten is bama.... If you can't beat the best team in college football, then you're right, you probably aren't going to win the national championship. However, last year it may have very well been possible to win the NC without beating bama had we just beaten OM, which he has done more times than he's lost to them.
Exactly. But their network is not run by freezus. He knows what's going on but not directly involved. Networking is done by cigar boys. Coach gives network the wish list and they go to work. To what extent the network does to get commits is controlled by the network, not the coach. Dan has been playing with a half deck.
For me personally I think it's Dan's personnel decisions that hold him back the most. Look at the freshmen that played well yesterday- Green, Bryant had the Sportscenter play of the day, Dear, etc.
That is the MOST frustrating thing to me.
And I'm wondering if we shouldn't have just put Malone at C from the start and let Desper play LG and Clayborn play RG.
There are ways to reward seniority and not compromise production and Dan needs to figure that out.
I agree with most of this.
What pisses me off is Dan was planning to leave and rubbing our nose in it. Last year he lost the Egg in Oxford and was saying he wouldn't sleep for a year. This year he loses it at home and was very nonchalant. He was winking at us and giving us a watered down version of the obnoxious shit he gives UNM.
Now he is here and stuck with us. He needs to act like he cares.
Meh, I think we are a very well coached team. Sure, our coaches make mistakes like everyone else's, but I believe we get a ton out of our talent.
We need better players to raise our ceiling. I think it's much more likely that we find a way to recruit better than it is that we find the super coach that allows us to compete for Atlanta with our current talent level.
We are a 7-9 win program now. Only way we become a 9-11 program is if we get better players.
Not really. It takes EVERYONE being on the same page to play the game.
How do people think OM's network is so much more effective than the rest of the country if the coaches aren't involved in the marching orders? IMO that's why they are more effective -- and also why they are eventually going to get made an example of IMO...
I agree we get a lot out of our talent, I just think we could get more years of it. Dan does play more young guys than he gets credit for, but there are some glaring examples of only getting 1 or 2 years out of really talented players. That said, I'll largely defer to our coaches on playing time bc there are other factors that contribute to playing time about which the masses are ignorant.
This is bullshit
I stated in the beginning that Mullen was talking to some teams- but I didnt know who. Turns out that is was Georgia and Maryland- with Miami coming in later. After I posted what I heard- I had others come to me and tell me Mullen wants out. And if you look at his actions- he did. None of this can disputed now. He was absolutely talking to those 3 schools.
I was led to believe he was going to be the coach at Maryland- and it came from multiple people. Not sure what happened- but here he stays. He is not leaving us anytime soon because he cant afford the paycut or that he cant get a blueblood job because he struggles to win big games.
Meh..... What the f*** are you talking about? You constantly harp on recruiting better player but "miss the forest for the trees" on why we aren't taking that next step in recruiting.
Todd hit the nail on the head. Dan since coming to MSU, has played seniority over talent. Only injuries or completely abysmal play forces him to play the younger more talented guys. Peters, Dear, Bryant, CJones, DLee, Green, and the rest of our more talented guys should have played more from snap one of their freshman seasons. Hell We didn't even really use A potential 1st round talent Jones until over halfway into his freshman season. The defensive guys mentioned above only got to see significant PT and starring roles because other lesser talented upperclassmen were injured and Dan had no choice to play them.
This is a two fold win win for us. Not only would our best players contribute, it would also show other 4-5* guys that they can actually play early and often. Bucky sells this shit to the recruits and backs it up by playing them. We sell them working to get to play and then put GD training wheels on our Ferari's and Porche's. If anyone thinks recruits don't take note of how we baby our top talent while others let them have at it, you are kidding yourselves.
If we are to take the next step on the field and in recruiting (which go hand in hand) we are going to have to start letting the best players play (young top talent) to show high schools guys you can play and then start singing better classes. The cycle will build itself but only if Dan Mullen changes his philosophy and doesn't try the f*cking 2-3 start developmental program on guys who are ready to play.
Agree. I believe we are in great shape with Dan going forward, unless one of about 7 programs offer him.
With Georgia passing on Mullen, it's clear to me that about the only way Dan can leave MSU without taking a paycut, would be to win BIG, or get fired.
One of the best moves Stricklin has made since being at MSU was to pay Dan 4+ mil a year. It out priced him for all but a handful of programs in the country & those handful of teams expect to win national titles.