Im not sold on Ray at all. When I saw a team lay down the other night, I wanted ray gone. He got his team to respond tonight so I gotta give him credit for that. I can handle losing, but I can't handle quitting
Printable View
I agree it was a good win for our team. But it only muddies the waters if he keeps losing to shitty teams and then beating a few decent teams here and there. We don't need a few nice victories sprinkled in to a season that ends at .500 in SEC play and no NIT bid. That will just leave people thinking maybe Ray can get it done. If we were 9-4 right now, I would still be on the fence...but I'm not going to let one decent victory erase the garbage I watched the last 6 games prior. String a few of these together and I might change my views. I respect your opinion though
I see your point.
I wanna see what ray can do with this team as it heals up. Sword is coming around and ware is back. If we don't show considerable improvement, I'd fire him. If we start laying down again like against mcneese, I'd fire Ray before the season ends.
If we can turn around and get to 8 or 9 SEC wins (seems unlikely, but we can do that without beating a single NIT- or NCAA-bound team), this season will be pretty much the same as a lot of Stansbury years.
In my book he had to be OVER .500 at the end of the season to keep him. That got a lot tougher for him because of 3 bad losses. For the talent on this team, we should at least be 9-4 right now. Basically he must have an above .500 SEC slate before I'd keep him for next season. So either A). It sorts itself out with losses and he gets fired B). He goes on a run to finish the season putting us above .500 giving him a shot at next year to make the post season. One win over FSU tells me nothing. We beat the sweet 16 OM team, when we were absolutely terrible. Let's see how it works itself out. Long season
All this does is delay the inevitable. Ray won't get it done because he isn't beating anybody on recruits (Power 5 schools). This signing class only Weatherspoon is good and he isn't the messiah on the hardwood either. Struggs and Tookie aren't good enough!
The only way we're actually firing him is if he underwhelms in one half and crashes and burns in the other half. He's certainly underwhelmed in the noncon. But I was pretty surprised to see him get the team back going after the last one, when I really thought they had laid down. He goes 9-9 in the SEC in the second half of the season, and we're right back to being split down the middle on what needs to happen with him...
The fanbase badly needs him to either go 6-12 or 12-6 to close this thing out IMO...
Don't know any conclusion, but it was kinda nice to see us looking like an actual basketball team
No motive either way. I like Rick Ray a lot. I liked Rick Stansbury too, although I supported his firing.
I just think it's worth pointing out that this current non-conference year has resembled a lot of non-conference years under Stans, all of the last 7 at least. There are a lot of Stans supporters who are looking for any reason to put Rick Ray down, (although in fairness, I think a lot of posters here hate both coaches), but any Stans supporter who wants to have a shred of consistency needs to be holding off until after the SEC slate to judge this season.