McReady said yesterday on H2H that regardless, he would count against their 25 limit this year. However, they were not clear if he would count towards the 85 limit. But dropping him definitely will hurt them.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tbonewannabe
Printable View
McReady said yesterday on H2H that regardless, he would count against their 25 limit this year. However, they were not clear if he would count towards the 85 limit. But dropping him definitely will hurt them.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tbonewannabe
Kellenberger makes Carl Walters look unbiased. Some of you are too young to remember him but he was about as biased as they could be. I don't know why we are shocked, it is and always been an Ole Miss paper.
I was told that OM can rescind the LOI unilaterally. There are always 'clauses' about bringing discredit to the University in LOIs.Quote:
Originally Posted by Todd4State
Thoughts?
Well, like I said they can kick him off the team at any point in time if they choose to do so. And that may very well happen. But I don't think they can get his spot back and not count it against the 25 man limit on NSD.Quote:
Originally Posted by BiscuitEater
I may be mistaken about that, but I've never heard of that happening where a team kicks off a guy that has signed a LOI and used his spot in the same recruiting class on a replacement player.
If they drop him, he shouldn't count against the 85 man limit.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Danko
Is it me or is McReady less biased than Kellenberger?
That's odd considering that one is employed by a biased source and the other is supposedly employed by an unbiased source.
McCready is still a Rebel homer but he is much less of a Rebel homer than the other guys. Kellenberger is the anti-Matt Stevens. Again, the job of a beat reporter is to simply report what the university tells them to put out. Then again, Ole Miss is probably telling Kellenberger to pump the team up and the party line to go with.Quote:
Originally Posted by ShotgunDawg
The thing is giving him a Scholy was third chance. Sooner or later the chances run out. There are too many examples in the bible where the Lord gave up on the people and either destroyed them or had them carried off where no one knows where they went.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bucky Dog
Noah and the earth.
Sodom and Gomorrah
The Ten Southern Tribes of Israel gone and no one knows where.
Then Later the two northern tribes of Benjinmen and Juda were taken into Babylon but they were giving one more chance later thanks to the faith of Daniel.
Unfortunately/fortunately? None of the charges were classed as felonies, all 7 were misdemeanors.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tbonewannabe
McReady is a gargantuan homer. He just likes to take the occasional anti-party line position so he can trumpet how independent he is. It his little passive/aggressive game.Quote:
Originally Posted by ShotgunDawg
But this premise of your post is correct and insightful. Kellenberger is the latest and greatest in a long list of pro-Bear "journalists" for the CL.
Think you're confusing the Old Testament with the New. The Old Testament had plenty of "vengeance" in it, but with Jesus, the only time He even lost his temper was with the "money-changers at the temple".Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Lambert
When you read the Old Test they referred God as Lord. There is no hebrew word for god so when it is used in the ole testament they use the word LORD. Maybe I should have put it in all upper case like the Old Testament does. For example Moses referred "LORD OF HOST". Daniel reffered to god as "LORD". I think he was talking to Gods Son Jesus. It is a little more confusing in the Old Testament but the LORD is used there as well and is alway captialized. Not the case in the New Testament.Quote:
Originally Posted by blacklistedbully
Now I personally believe that God, Jesus and the Holy Ghost are all seperate. I also believe that Jesus was in heaven with god during this period. When the bible says they are one I feel it saying they are one in purpose.