OVERTURN fumble

I'm not saying we lost because of it, but its worth noting.

We lost mainly because Sims killed us running on 3rd down.

Should have not been overturned. Wasn't a TD but we will just agree to disagree. You can't base it on the overhead angle because physics makes your eyes play tricks with where the ball is. The straight up view was inconclusive and that is what you should base your decision on. It was inconclusive and therefore should not have been overturned.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MarketingBully01

It was inconclusive and therefore should not have been overturned.

---

Yup.

Well, Gary thought it was a TD, so thats all that matters.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by shoeless joe

It looked like he probably scored. But I never saw a shot of indisputable video evidence. It was more like "here he was on this view, and here he was on this view, so the ball had to cross the goaline...right?"

I've seen much more clear evidence not be over turned. But when you have 3 turnovers and your opponent has zero it's hard to win.

---

Actually, they can time synch multiple views and use evidence from both views to make the call.

At the end of the day, it was a TD and that call didn't lose the game for us. Our tight play in the 1st half and our questionable play calling did. D played a hell of a game and Dak came back strong in the second half. The tipped INT was bad luck (would've been a TD if completed) and the multiple drops cost us big.

Glad we fought hard and made it respectable, but we should've won that game.