7-5

North Dakota guy that coached at North Dakota St for 15 years after playing there, then at Wyoming and now at Montana St. Would be interesting and likely end up like Harsin did at Auburn

I had emailed Selmon back in November 2023 that he should hire Curt Cignetti. Maybe this time he will listen to me. I will forward the email to remind him my last suggestion turned out pretty good LOL.

If Lebby goes 6-6 against this schedule with 9 SEC games (no Arkansas) and a road P4 game at Minnesota I would be fine with keeping him. We only have 2 OOC games as relativity easy wins. Will have to scratch and claw to get 4 more. 7-5 this Fall to me would be more like 8-4 in the past. How long will the P4 mandate continue with 9 SEC games? Indefinitely?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by maroonmania

How long will the P4 mandate continue with 9 SEC games? Indefinitely?

---

Probably here to stay if I had a guess

Some of you loose track of reality. State now has a 9 game SEC schedule, meaning to get to 7 wins they need to beat 4 SEC teams. Now name 4 teams that State will beat. besides who is on the schedule.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PGHBulldogBG

I had emailed Selmon back in November 2023 that he should hire Curt Cignetti. Maybe this time he will listen to me. I will forward the email to remind him my last suggestion turned out pretty good LOL.

---

only if he could bring Mark Cubans money.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Offshore Dawg

only if he could bring Mark Cubans money.

---

That would be nice but we don't get that lucky as State fans.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by StarkVegasSteve

Minnesota at their place will be tough early in the year. Teams salivate at the chance to knock off an SEC team. If we can make it past that one, which I think we will, I think we can find a way to 6 or 7. South Carolina in Columbia could be a rough first SEC start for Kamario. In a way, I'm glad he goes on the road to a P4 team before we travel to Columbia.

---

If we beat Minnesota we should have a good season. Beamer has a legit OC now in Kendall. That?s gonna be tough. I actually think we beat Bama. The rumor is DeBoar is softer than Charmin. They have gone back to Mike Shula/Mike Dubose Bama. I also would not be surprised if we are looking at our 7th win vs OM.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Offshore Dawg

Some of you loose track of reality. State now has a 9 game SEC schedule, meaning to get to 7 wins they need to beat 4 SEC teams. Now name 4 teams that State will beat. besides who is on the schedule.

---

Dude, did you watch the team last year? With a subpar defense, and a very poor offensive line we could have won 4 last year. We will be a better team on both sides of the ball next year, but the big questions are did Lebby learn from his game management mistakes and is KT improved during the offseason?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Thick

Dude, did you watch the team last year? With a subpar defense, and a very poor offensive line we could have won 4 last year. We will be a better team on both sides of the ball next year, but the big questions are did Lebby learn from his game management mistakes and is KT improved during the offseason?

---

Thick, there are a lot of ifs with this team. my question was name the 4 SEC wins.

I think the only “if’s” are the 2 that I mentioned and our offensive line. I think Arnette has enough talent to field a pretty good defense. Of course, our schedule is brutal, but when will a 9 game SEC schedule be easy? I wasn’t trying to be a jerk.

You never really know how good teams are going to be from year to year, but I think it's reasonable to think we have:

• 2 likely wins - ULM, Tennessee Tech
• 5 likely losses - Alabama, @LSU, Oklahoma, @Texas, @Ole Miss
• 5 "swing" games - @Minnesota, @South Carolina, Missouri, Vanderbilt, Auburn

5-0 in those swing games seems pretty unlikely. The next hire will be the most important in MSU athletic history. We can't go cheap. We need to pay out the ass for a "splash hire" AND have him live up to expectations.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PGHBulldogBG

Brent Vigen is the one we need to hire if we want a chance to get into the top of the league. We need to do what we can to get him here. No more coordinators, no more coaches winning in leagues because they have a talent advantage. It's time for a coach who has consistently won big at lower level schools.

---

If there's a "next Cignetti" out there, it's probably Vigen. What he's done at Montana State (who has historically been the "little brother" in the state) is outstanding, five years finishing #2, #5, #9, #2, and #1.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by StarkVegasSteve

Does he know how to operate in the NIL world?

---

Yes, Montana State is paying NIL.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by StarkVegasSteve

Also, is he winning at Montana St because they fund it better than 95% of the FCS?

---

It helps. It would be enough for any remotely competent coach to get Montana State (along with Montana and the Dakotas) into the 24-team bracket more often than not, but Vigen has gone way beyond that. He's proven that he's a great talent identifier, game-planner, and in-game coach.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by StarkVegasSteve

How would he do at a place that funds lower than 65% of their own league?

---

You never know, but I think it's likely he would at least win the Mullen/Leach standard and not regularly embarrass us on and off the field like 3 of our last 4 coaches have.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by StarkVegasSteve

We won't hire either of them. I'm interested to see what Brian Hartline looks like in Year 1 at USF. I'm also interested to see if Jerry Mack builds on what he did year 1 at Kennesaw. I may be in a minority, but I don't think Huff is going to fare well at Memphis. I'd honestly make a run at Jedd Fisch. He wants out of Washington so badly that he'd be amenable to our job. Unlike he would've been in the past.

Dan isn't coming back. Period. End of Discussion. He's at UNLV until at least 2028. Cannon is at Bishop Gorman right now and in the 10th grade. One of the main reasons he took that job is so Cannon could go to Gorman.

On Arnett, the fire is still there. It's very much still there. From everything I've heard, we're getting piss and vinegar Arnett once more. I, like you, was worried about what Arnett we would be getting. Everyone I've spoken to says this is the old Arnett. Gruff, pissed off, and doesn't want to associate with anyone.

---

Yeah. Well, my confidence in our boosters making a good hiring decision in football is extremely low to say the least and rightfully so. I had a lot of people tell me that Arnett would never be coming back either and look at who we brought back.

I don't know why some of our fans in this thread are talking about about Brent Vigen. That's the same level of football that Joe Moorhead was successful at. Personally, I think it's too big of a jump for him. And too big of a risk for MSU to take.

If it were me, I would go after Blake Harrell at East Carolina.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blake_Harrell

That's the kind of resume and the level of football we need to be looking at.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by StarkVegasSteve

Does he know how to operate in the NIL world? That's the biggest thing I look at these days. Also, is he winning at Montana St because they fund it better than 95% of the FCS?

How would he do at a place that funds lower than 65% of their own league?

---

Here's the other thing with Vigen or any coach in this portal era.

You hire a coach, you expect them to bring some of their players with them. Do we really want to try to win SEC games with Montana State players? Yeah. Didn't think so.

https://www.espn.com/college-footbal...tana-st-oregon

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Quaoarsking

Yes, Montana State is paying NIL.

It helps. It would be enough for any remotely competent coach to get Montana State (along with Montana and the Dakotas) into the 24-team bracket more often than not, but Vigen has gone way beyond that. He's proven that he's a great talent identifier, game-planner, and in-game coach.

You never know, but I think it's likely he would at least win the Mullen/Leach standard and not regularly embarrass us on and off the field like 3 of our last 4 coaches have.

---

He doesn't ring pay out the butt / splash hire like you also mentioned right above in your post. I think he's a good coach but it's a big jump from FCS and he's never coached at a P4 program. Spent his entire career with Bohl. There are legit concerns how he would be running a P4 program.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Todd4State

I don't know why some of our fans in this thread are talking about about Brent Vigen. That's the same level of football that Joe Moorhead was successful at.

---

That's not a good comparison. Moorhead 38-13 at Fordham, pretty good record, but in one of the worst FCS conferences, and when he had scholarship players and the rest of the Patriot League was walk-on only. He never made it past the second round of the playoffs.

Vigen is 61-12 in the best (or possibly #2) FCS conference, with only top 10 finishes, and three times in the top 2, including 1 championship

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Todd4State

Here's the other thing with Vigen or any coach in this portal era.

You hire a coach, you expect them to bring some of their players with them. Do we really want to try to win SEC games with Montana State players? Yeah. Didn't think so.

https://www.espn.com/college-footbal...tana-st-oregon

---

Hard to say that in a thread where you endorsed the East Carolina coach though. Neither Vigen nor Harrell would bring more than a handful of transfer players with them ... but what sitting head coach that we could plausibly hire would?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Really Clark?

He doesn't ring pay out the butt / splash hire like you also mentioned right above in your post. I think he's a good coach but it's a big jump from FCS and he's never coached at a P4 program. Spent his entire career with Bohl. There are legit concerns how he would be running a P4 program.

---

I agree that he's not the "splash hire" I want to see, but I'm pretty sure we could get him (unless a big P4 program snatches him away at the same time), and I would still expect him to win here.

He should be the backup/"safety" candidate in mind.