Georgia suing player over NIL transfer

It's a frivolous suit unfortunately that will be laughed out of the courtroom. They can only show damages of maybe half of the $30k he received. No way they can prove $390k. Judge is gonna laugh them out of the courtroom and then UGA gonna get hit with a countersuit of defamation. I love it!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Political Hack

Millionaires controlling disadvantaged populations. It's all the rage. You should look into it.

---

fantastic response

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Homedawg

That's not why they are suing. They are suing bc he took money up front and didn't live out his contract and bolted.

---

He never received the amount sued for. He was paid $30k and sued for $300k. How do you measure value without having incentives and structure built into an NIL.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mparkerfd20

It's a frivolous suit unfortunately that will be laughed out of the courtroom. They can only show damages of maybe half of the $30k he received. No way they can prove $390k. Judge is gonna laugh them out of the courtroom and then UGA gonna get hit with a countersuit of defamation. I love it!

---

The kid should definitely counter, let's make it interesting!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Political Hack

A large percentage of the most talented high school athletes in the country come from disadvantages populations. But not always. I dont mean this in a mean way towards the kid, but I actually hope he did something other than "just didn't perform well." If coaches start suing over performance, contracts are basically worth nothing. They may as well go to a 'dollar per yard' scheme at that point.

---

I think this is a great starting point for NIL contracts. More structure, incentives, and caps needed for unproven players.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by starkvegasdawg

I'm no lawyer, but couldn't the player just claim he received better coaching and mentoring at Missouri which allowed him to perform better? Not sure how you prove he was intentionally underperforming.

---

It's not about performance, he signed with Liquidated Damages. He only got $30K from UGA, but could now owe $390k.

"Many schools and collectives have started to include liquidated damages clauses in their contracts with athletes to protect their investment in players and deter transfers. Georgia is one of the first programs to publicly try to enforce the clause by filing suit against a player."

What is shocking is the UGA is a purchasing school. If all NIL deals have liquidated damages, this would end the Portal. Unless the new schools start paying the damages.

I wonder if MSU is owed by DVB with liquidated damages. Let's get 2M from DVB and use it on a LHP and a Power SS for 2027.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Political Hack

A large percentage of the most talented high school athletes in the country come from disadvantages populations. But not always. I dont mean this in a mean way towards the kid, but I actually hope he did something other than "just didn't perform well." If coaches start suing over performance, contracts are basically worth nothing. They may as well go to a 'dollar per yard' scheme at that point.

---

I would say he is an Advantaged person. Most people are not 6-5 250lbs and get free tuition for playing kid-games. Football size is an unearned gift the same as being born to Jensen Hwang. Most students have to work 20 to 40 hours to only partially-pay for tuition and meals. Plus the regular kids have to be chiseled for meal plans, activities fees, and let the football players use the good parking spots.

Mizzou should pay the Liquidated Damages for the player. But they are not bound to pay, since the individual kid is the contract signer with UGA.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bulldawg28

Really? What part do you like about it?

---

The fact that this is a case that can lead to structure in NIL? Pay for play is not the same as NIL. A true NIL system does not exist.

There should be performance incentives to NIL. You don?t perform, you aren?t compensated to the fullest extent. That?s how it works with every system. Why should it be different? It should also not be called NIL. It?s essentially a contract that these kids are constantly trying to renegotiate. I don?t hold it against them for trying to squeeze the most money out of the thing. This system still needs rails. - players should 100% be protected in the case of injury. But if you underperform I don?t see why you should get paid the entire thing. It?s a job now. If I sucked at mine I would be fired and not given my yearly salary.

I agree with Mullen that the whole system needs to be blown up and started from scratch. Maybe there?s more details to this I am unaware of. I have not looked into it at all outside of what has been commented on this board. I don?t think common sense changes to this are a bad thing. No court is going to make that kid pay that money back anyways, but it might initiate some positive discussions.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Federalist Engineer

I would say he is an Advantaged person. Most people are not 6-5 250lbs and get free tuition for playing kid-games. Football size is an unearned gift the same as being born to Jensen Hwang. Most students have to work 20 to 40 hours to only partially-pay for tuition and meals. Plus the regular kids have to be chiseled for meal plans, activities fees, and let the football players use the good parking spots.

Mizzou should pay the Liquidated Damages for the player. But they are not bound to pay, since the individual kid is the contract signer with UGA.

---

I believe OP is referencing socio economic factors. Not the physical attributes