Lockhart flips back

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gtowndawg

The national ranking is fine, it's ok. But the scary thing is we signed four 4 stars, that's it. Ole Miss signed 14 as a comparison and they were middle of the pack in the SEC. Bottom line, we really didn't sign any perceived difference makers (expect for a couple) and most of the recruits didn't have offers from blue bloods. In the past I think signing a class ranked 25th in the country was fine because we had good depth already in place. Not so much now.

Bottom line, it all comes down to the portal to have any prayer of getting out of this mess and win some conference games.

---

What? 14 four stars. No.

247 has OM with 7 four stars. Average player ranking of 90.09
It has us with 5 four stars. Average player ranking of 87.77

On3 has OM with 10 four stars. Average player ranking of 90.3
It has us with 5 four stars. Average player ranking of 89.1

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by confucius say

What? 14 four stars. No.

247 has OM with 7 four stars. Average player ranking of 90.09
It has us with 5 four stars. Average player ranking of 87.77

On3 has OM with 10 four stars. Average player ranking of 90.3
It has us with 5 four stars. Average player ranking of 89.1

---

24/7 has 1 5 star and 13 (was 14 before Lockhart flipped back, my bad there) for Ole Miss. No 5 stars for us and four 4-stars. Here's a link to the SEC rankings on 24/7.

edited: So I see what you mean, if you go click on the Ole Miss class and literally count them, it is 7 4 stars for Ole Miss. But the overall ranking on the team total pages says 14 in that column??? Maybe it's 13 4-stars going off 247 rankings but their overall rank is not a 4 star? Only explanation right?

Maybe. Not sure.

Mississippi did their usual mess and tried to cut out important people in the equation. It's no surprise that they keep getting involved in these situations