Not sure if you're serious. Leach is now looking fit his 5th option. That's not a good thing... leach thought 4 guys would've been better
Printable View
Where you getting 5th. Newberry and Bateman turned us down. I believe there were several factors but one big one might be how both had just moved their families within last year or so and both are also in pretty good locations. Gotta take the fam into account sometimes.
As I've said I only think 2 have so far. Any others tell us no? I also believe Leach is looking for a specific D philosophy and associated historical results.
But I think we can all admit that we are surprised some of these top candidates are not interested in the job. We are offering probably at least a 200k raise to most people, in the best conference in the nation at a school that has a reputation of having good defenses and has also proven to be a very good stepping stone job.
It?s not going to be attractive to everyone but just a bit odd that we seem to be having this much trouble.
Does Leach have a history of being difficult to work for as a DC or something?
I think the stats given in other threads show that his offense doesn?t force the defense to play an huge increase in number of plays
Maybe it's time to insert the old Cliche that a good defense is a Strong Offense **
I think it's something more along the lines of waiting too late this year to change out our Coaching staff - gotta admit that this was kinda late in the year for staff changes ... maybe if we pulled the plug just after the Egg Bowl but just thinking back - have we ever had a known experienced coordinator other than Grantham and JL Dunn come aboard ?
Take what we can get this year and if it doesn't work then change again next year - I hate the appearance of desperation but we have put our self in this position and I say it's worth it ... not everyone can say no to the kind of money we can offer
Should have just kept Shoops.