Gonna have to encase all the balls and programs I got Acuna, Albies and Gohara to sign for me last year. Funny having to have Goh having to interpret for acuna when talking to them..
Printable View
Gonna have to encase all the balls and programs I got Acuna, Albies and Gohara to sign for me last year. Funny having to have Goh having to interpret for acuna when talking to them..
Camargo very well may not be an everyday guy, but Bautista at 3b is much more of a question mark than camargo. The worst part of this is we just gave the job to him. He will be promoted and given a starting role just bc of his name bc he is not the same player as 3 seasons ago
Don't necessarily disagree but if a few weeks down the road he's stinkin it up then he'll get DFA'd and the experiment cost very little. On the flip side he's rejuvenated and gives some solid production and still didn't cost much of anything and, I repeat, does not affect the ability to make a move that will be much needed to compete either this yr or next.
Play the Phillies tomorrow. I'll have to set the DVR to a 3 hour extension. LOL.
1 year and you're skewing the stats. How many ABs? What level is Carmango playing at? Bautista was hurt some last year. I kept him as a keeper for five straight years. Besides last year he hit at an All-Star level. What are Bautista's numbers the previous five seasons before last? Before last year he was leading the MLB in total homeruns for a good stretch of time. Like half a decade.
They probably told Bautista that if he went ahead and signed a minor league deal it would be a formality that he'll be able to get called up and get the chance to play at 3B every day. And the Braves are looking at it like this: 1. if he can provide big time power batting 5th or 6th and not be awful at 3B then he'll remain the starter. 2. if he sucks like he did last year then he's one hell of a pinch hitter for our team. I think the latter ends up happening and Camargo is the starting 3rd baseman the second half of the season. If that's the case and Buatista is a pinch hitter, that's a big plus over Culberson or Peter Bourjos.
But having Tucker as a lefty and Bautista on the bench gives you power from both sides. I'd keep Culberson because he can play every infield position and release Flahrty (assuming he's going to return to his career .221 average). Markakis, Inciarte and Acuna are just going to have to play every day. And I'm sure Acuna could play CF if need be and Tucker a corner OF position as well as Buatista.
There is a shift that must happen in the way teams view players like Flaherty. Instead of looking at him and saying, 'Wow, he's batting .300+, we need to keep him in the lineup while he's hitting this well,' we need to look at him and say, 'Wow, we got 21 games of .300+ out of Ryan Flaherty, how fortunate we are!' and stop playing him before we get the cold spell that brings him back down to career norms. If you wait until he falls back to where he's been, then you got nothing beneficial out of him. You just got more games of a normal Ryan Flaherty instead of just the good stuff.
Hopefully we're shifting in the way we view that, but we'll just have to see.
Haha what?
We know what Ryan Flaherty is. He has proven that over 6 major league seasons. He currently has a BABIP over .400. That means you have lucked out and gotten much better production out of Ryan Flaherty than you could have ever hoped or than he is likely to produce going forward.
So, if you continue playing Flaherty, he will almost certainly come back down to career norms. By doing so, you will negate any positives from having him play so far above his head to start. If you stop playing him (or at least stop starting him since we now have a better option), you will ensure you were the lucky beneficiary of his surprising play.
It's like gambling. If you go to Vegas and win huge your first time out, you should absolutely stop playing. Instead, people continue, thinking they can keep getting lucky, and they negate any gains they got.
What is bleak about that?
Never assume performance will.drop below career norms to "stabilize" his numbers. Dice.have no memory. He is most likely to put up his career numbers from here out, averaging with his lucky start to give him a career year. If you have a better option than his career numbers, then you play him. If not, ride the hot streak.
This 100%. At some point there may be diminishing returns that force your hand. But you don't preemptively take him out because his career numbers will potentially point to regression back to norm. You ride it until it's gone. Once you realize that the return is not good enough, then you consider making a change. But I've never heard of sitting someone that was hot because the next day they may not be hot because their career numbers say at some point they will probably not be as good as they are showing.
I would be done with Flahrty as soon as Jose Bautista is ready to be promoted. And since he's hitting over .300, maybe another team will trade him for cash or a reliever with an expiring contract. Right now he's going to be a victim of being on a talented team, or at least he should be. Watch the barving commence when they send Comargo back to AAA instead.
1-run game with top of Phillies' lineup up... let's get a new kid his first action. Snit continues to be the dumbest dude alive. No way I trust snit and chuckle with these young kids
Who'd he bring in?
Snitker makes me so mad!!! Why is Flaherty playing again?
On the bright side: Flowers is catching tonight and Acuna is up to the 5 spot in the lineup!
What is the prognosis on Teheran? He left game early last outing.
https://s14.postimg.cc/9wg6yonsx/29_...9_FBF51_E3.jpg
I like this lineup