Gentleman the wheels are in motion

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by msstate7

What about tommy Stevens? He a losing bitch too? What about hurts?

---

Neither Tommy Stevens nor Jalen Hurts stayed on a team that they apparently refused to play for. Would have been numerous occasions this year that Stephens could have helped us and still kept a redshirt year. Logan Burnett playing and Thompson not playing tells me Thompson had no intention to play for us but just had no landing spot when he went in the portal.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by maroonmania

Neither Tommy Stevens nor Jalen Hurts stayed on a team that they apparently refused to play for. Would have been numerous occasions this year that Stephens could have helped us and still kept a redshirt year. Logan Burnett playing and Thompson not playing tells me Thompson had no intention to play for us but just had no landing spot when he went in the portal.

---

Well, all sources indicate that isn’t true and Moorhead just won’t play him.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dawgology

I mean...I feel that it?s Chizik based on what has been said. Not sure if that?s really an amazing hire but we will see I guess.

---

Sorry but I don't think Chizik will bring the season ticket holders motivation to come back. I am buying my next season regardless.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by KOdawg1

If we do end up making a coaching change, I'm going to be tempted to cancel my Gene's Page subscription. I enjoy the recruiting info over there, but Paul and others on there have their heads in the sand, and why pay for "insider" information when they don't release it bc they have an agenda?

---

Welcome to me 3 years ago. Same stuff here sooner and free.

10 pages for someone to make a total ass of himself, no name to be thrown out, and this gives us no info the last thread did which was all but confirm Joe to somewhere else and we have our replacement lined up.

I'm not bitching about their not being a name, but what's the point of this thread? It's a duplicate.

Also Napier is the name that got leaked pretty much everywhere else.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Turfdawg67

Hey JohnHenry... He with 12 posts calling someone, who's comments was correct, a dumbass?? Like we need another douche on board.

---

Gonna be some trolling over the next 72 hrs

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OLJWales

Gonna be some trolling over the next 72 hrs

---

The trolling of the board peaked with dropping Chizik's name.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dantheman4248

10 pages for someone to make a total ass of himself, no name to be thrown out, and this gives us no info the last thread did which was all but confirm Joe to somewhere else and we have our replacement lined up.

I'm not bitching about their not being a name, but what's the point of this thread? It's a duplicate.

Also Napier is the name that got leaked pretty much everywhere else.

---

It's called respecting your sources. I know it's frustrating to us not knowing but I'm appreciative of the thread.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OLJWales

It's called respecting your sources. I know it's frustrating to us not knowing but I'm appreciative of the thread.

---

I mean I was appreciative of the first thread but this is just a rehash. We've gone from a 10+ page thread Sunday about "Moorhead has a job lined up and we have an agreement with a replacement." to a 10+ page thread on "Moorhead has a job lined up and we have an agreement with a replacement." on Wednesday. Literally nothing new.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dantheman4248

I mean I was appreciative of the first thread but this is just a rehash. We've gone from a 10+ page thread Sunday about "Moorhead has a job lined up and we have an agreement with a replacement." to a 10+ page thread on "Moorhead has a job lined up and we have an agreement with a replacement." on Wednesday. Literally nothing new.

---

Yep , I get that but we are now getting info we've got our new man. This threads jacking up my work.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dawgday166

Here's the thing with me on this that I've noticed about our fans for years. Someone wants to leave MSU they quitters or doesn't choose MSU in recruiting and we didn't want them anyway.

We get someone via transfer like Tommy ... there's a real good reason he wanted out of PSU and their staff ain't handling him the right way. Plus, he the next Joe Montana and better than Dak.

Can't have it both ways.

Talking about a cancer to a team IMO .. Guidry. We coddled him during recruiting, he's been coddled ever since, he's still being coddled and ... look what we've gotten out of it. If there is a locker room issue(s) I'm betting him starting every week is one of them.

---

I'm fine with him transferring. Don't understand why stay and then you won't play when needed even though a redshirt can be retained? I find it hard to believe that Moorhead refuses to let him play.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TrapGame

Add to that Joe had a NFL caliber RB at Fordham for a couple of seasons. I'm sure that was like an 8th grader running over 3rd graders.

---

He also had an NFL o-lineman at Fordham (G Mayweather made it with the Chiefs for a few years).

A good guess is that he is on target to graduate by May and can transfer without a sit out issue and have 2 to play. He can also watch the MSU situation closely and if there is a coaching change, he can evaluate the opportunity of remaining at MSU and have 2 to play 2.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by maroonmania

Don't understand why stay and then you won't play when needed even though a redshirt can be retained? I find it hard to believe that Moorhead refuses to let him play.

---

Moorhead has refused to play him because he quit for a few days after "losing the QB battle". Let him back to help him stay on scholly but has vowed to not play him.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bluelightstar

I just hope this didn?t hurt us in New Orleans too much. Every time I?m down there now in State gear, the first thing people ask is ?what happened with KT??

---

Best answer for that is "Mullen screwed him over by leaving" because honestly, that is the real answer. He was Mullen's guy and was never JM's guy. Schrader is JM's guy so if he is replaced who knows what happens then. I will say that GS has all the potential in the world as a runner and passer, so he should be much more adaptable to any system.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Turfdawg67

Me on Monday if Cheezdik is our new coach...

https://i.postimg.cc/QN5j4j2J/BD204-...8-A3-C8-CB.gif

---

I agree, if we want to go that route Will Muschamp should be available in about a week as well.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by StateDawg44

We already have countless threads with this. What good would this do?

---

I've seen tons of threads with posters claiming there is change coming and they think it's #coach but only a couple of them are saying they actually know the name and can't tell it. Those select few are who I want to put names out.

Most of the rest of you clowns are just guessing and don't claim to know any more than I do which is 0.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Coach34

Moorhead has refused to play him because he quit for a few days after "losing the QB battle". Let him back to help him stay on scholly but has vowed to not play him.

---

OK, well then apologies to KT. He shouldn't have quit but to refuse to let him play at all after you let him back on the team just seems spiteful.

I hope that whoever it is is bringing some WR with him...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dantheman4248

10 pages for someone to make a total ass of himself, no name to be thrown out, and this gives us no info the last thread did which was all but confirm Joe to somewhere else and we have our replacement lined up.

I'm not bitching about their not being a name, but what's the point of this thread? It's a duplicate.

Also Napier is the name that got leaked pretty much everywhere else.

---

It means it didn?t get enough attention the first 15 times it was said. Like it or not, it is where we are.