Who wants ro bet some of these idiots wouldn't stop smoking weed
Printable View
Who wants ro bet some of these idiots wouldn't stop smoking weed
To be clear I haven't checked on why they got the punt. But I will say, if we- leach is going to punt people for smoking dope(and I'm not talking 3/4 times) then he won't make it here... and I don't smoke. But these kids do. And yes it will hurt recruiting when word gets out.
Who gives a 17 about smoking weed. I would make sure athletes passed that bullshit. So many people do weed and they are successful and productive etc. it?s better than alcohol. It?s illegal only because of William Randolph Hearst.
99% of college football players are sparking up. Calvin Johnson did after every game because he didn?t want mat to take opioids.
If Leach is so hardcore on this he needs to check himself, because word is he?s a damn near a drunk.
I keep seeing/hearing that Leach has a one strike policy with weed. I don't know if that is true but if it is true then he better not test the players or he better get ready to be Vandy bad.
College football players smoke weed. Saban's players do. The great moralistic Dabo's players do.
I don't think the NFL suspends players for weed so Mississippi State kicking them off the team for one violation won't work.
Fans can gnash their teeth over this and pretend it's the 20th century and think we can get some good ole wholesome boys to play for us and win but it ain't happening.
Bullshit its his rules follow them. If you can't give up smoking weed and lut your education abd career on the line because of it you have issues.
Half the 7th graders in MS smoke weed. If Leach is one and done, Cohen will have to step in.
Too bad BYU will out-recruit us for those players.**Quote:
Originally Posted by LC Dawg
So how come only non-starters are getting the boot?
Do our starters not smoke weed?
Point being, there’s more going on here.
"everyone does it so what's wrong with smoking weed? Leach is the problem here" give me a break. If that's his rule then follow it. It's not as though what he's asking is unreasonable although most on here say so.
https://www.lung.org/quit-smoking/sm...nd-lung-health
I understand the issue here isn't with health. People smoke cigarettes and drink cases of alcohol all the time. The problem is with the neurological side effects: https://www.drugabuse.gov/publicatio...acts/marijuana take a second and look at the short and long term effects of marijuana usage. Weed (outside of very specific medical usage) should not be encouraged so therefore I have no problem with Leach (if it's even true) taking a hardcore stance against it.
Doubt he got cut (if that's the case) if it was his first offense.
Leach is a dinosaur looking to go extinct.
He looks and sounds like a drunk 90% of the time.Quote:
Originally Posted by SPMT
1. State should have hired Sarkisian.Quote:
Originally Posted by bulldawg28
2. Leach is going to have quite the problem if and when weed dispensarys are in Starkville.
I don't think Sark was the answer at allQuote:
Originally Posted by Maroonthirteen
Yeah.... Alabama only leads the conference in all but one offensive category. #3 in the nation in offense.Quote:
Originally Posted by ShotgunDawg
But whatever ..... I'm not arguing with you. We can revisit this topic at seasons end.
How many 5 stars on Alabama's offense?
You could OC Bama to a top 20 offense.Quote:
Originally Posted by Maroonthirteen
Wish people would get would think this stuff through.
Why is in the world would anyone hire Sark over Leach when Sark has already failed at two blue bloods and Leach has never failed? What possible logic is there to that?
I agree with you some on doubting Leach, but you need to reign it in a little. This is not true and only shows you are reaching.Quote:
Originally Posted by bulldawg28
AgreedQuote:
Originally Posted by ShotgunDawg
AgreedQuote:
Originally Posted by Maroonthirteen
50% of 7th graders? where you hear that?Quote:
Originally Posted by HoopsDawg
There's no logic to hiring Sark over Leach. None whatsoever.Quote:
Originally Posted by bulldawg28
People in decision making positions have to justify their hirings. They can't just throw crap at the wall and keep their job.
There's not a single bit of logic to hiring Sark over Leach that you could justify to a university president.
If the rules are "don't smoke weed", then I have no problem with a player being booted for smoking weed. Why is it wrong to hold people accountable?
Agree, but I don't think that's the rule. If that's the rule and only backups happen to smoke weed, then that's interesting natural selection biasQuote:
Originally Posted by somebodyshotmypaw
A young upcoming coach that's a proven winner and program manager sounds better than an end of his career old school media darling.Quote:
Originally Posted by ShotgunDawg
Sark is a dang good football coach. If he is really on the wagon then somebody is going to get a very good head coach very soon. That is the only thing working against him.Quote:
Originally Posted by ShotgunDawg
He is a better coach that isn't a media darling one trick pony.Quote:
Originally Posted by ShotgunDawg
That may be so but there's no logic to hiring him over Leach and you wouldn't bet $5 mil on Sark being betterQuote:
Originally Posted by Liverpooldawg
then why doesn't his head coaching record reflect that?Quote:
Originally Posted by Liverpooldawg
I wouldn't have hired Sark over Leach at the time. You have to be careful hiring Bama assistants. Cohen got fooled by Moorhead and didn't realize how much talent Moorhead was working with at Penn State.Quote:
Originally Posted by ShotgunDawg
Leach can win here if he will adapt. If he continues to blame personnel and execution like you do as a dense poster, he will fail.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShotgunDawg
This is 17n message board dude.
My point was Sark's offense is looking good. Leach's not so much. If you want to talk real, I can get Cohen being apprehensive about hiring Sark given his exit at USC. However, you are being illogical regarding Sark for the sole purpose of defending your coach crush. Sark took over a UW team that had 5 losing seasons prior, which included a 0-12 season. He had one decent year at USC and won 8 games, calling plays drunk. He has a .550 winning percentage as a HC. Leach is .600 as a HC.
We all know the reality is that Leach better workout because State is stuck with Leach 3-4 years. It has been duly noted that you're 100 a Leach guy. You don't have to run to his defense anytime someone has a thought to the contrary regarding Leach. We will all find out in 3-4 years if the Leach era is a good one. 2020...so far,the air-raid is a paper airplane.
However, you have already said this summer.... it was illogical for State to be ONLY slight favorites v Arkansas and a dog v UK for the 2020 year. You were wrong and being an illogical fan.
Young upcoming?Quote:
Originally Posted by bulldawg28
He's already failed at 2 blue bloods. There's a lot more to running a program than just being a bright offensive mind.
100% agreeQuote:
Originally Posted by HoopsDawg
So this is really the extent of the opinion. Pretty in depth analysis here. I'm sure college presidents would be thrilled with you as an ADQuote:
Originally Posted by Maroonthirteen
The fact that people are mad that kids are held accountable and face consequences due to breaking rules is perplexing. Microcosm of society I guess.
Leach ultimately failed at Tech and was run off. WSU was glad he left. Sark has more upside.Quote:
Originally Posted by ShotgunDawg
What freak are you smoking? Failed at TECH? You have no idea what you are saying.. WSU glad he left? UMMMM, they will be back to winning 1-3 game a year in short order.Quote:
Originally Posted by bulldawg28
He's got to be just trolling at this point, right? He can't be this stupid and dishonest, right?Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot Rock
He may have failed at being nice to booster's kids but he did not fail at winning at TTech.Quote:
Originally Posted by bulldawg28
2000 7-6
2001 7-6
2002 9-5
2003 8-5
2004 8-4
2005 9-3
2006 8-5
2007 9-4
2008 11-2
2009 8-4 didn't coach bowl but they won on his system so 9-4.
I'm not sure if he will win at State or not but to say he failed at TTech is simply not true with regards to winning and losing.
If you're fired or run off, you failed. He was fired at TexasTech.... that's failing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot Rock