Megan was only ever mad at us not having a Target. Art Briles' daughter hates that fans express anger at horrendously bad coaching decisions.
Though Dan's knock is he has the same number of wins against Bama as Lebby does against the SEC.
Printable View
Megan was only ever mad at us not having a Target. Art Briles' daughter hates that fans express anger at horrendously bad coaching decisions.
Though Dan's knock is he has the same number of wins against Bama as Lebby does against the SEC.
It won't happen, but only a fool would want Lebby over Mullen
Dan will try to leave again like he is already doing at UNLV and that's only after half a season. No thank you.
Are we? He peaked with us so we weren't really going anywhere. Bringing him back wouldn't move the program forward which is what we need. We've won with other coaches like Jackie and Leach so it's not like he is the only one who can win here. He had more 6-6 seasons than 2014's and a lot of our fans forget that. And that was with easier schedules than we have now.
Was Dan much better than we've had since he left? Mostly yes, but Leach posted basically the same record.
Would hiring Dan allow us to reset back to 10 years go? HELL NO! The game is different now. His offense is stale, his one big advantage vs other coaches (the ability to find and develop diamonds in the rough) is invalidated now that those same players will leave for NIL.
College football is about (in order):
1) NIL, which will be the same for Dan as it is for Lebby
2) Roster construction. Dan was never good at it, often signing very few players at a given position in a class. With the Portal resulting in far faster roster turnover, Dan would be even worse now. By contrast, Lebby did a great job this offseason with the Portal. Lets be brutally honest about the teams Dan built: Would Dak have stated in 2014 if LSU offered $2M in NIL? Would Montez Sweat have stated for his Sr year after leading the SEC in sacks, or would he have left for hundreds of thousands more NIL and a chance to win a natty? Dan won with developing players into stars, but today that doesn't work because they'll leave immediately.
3) scheme, which Lebby beats Dan in. Look at how many open receivers we had last night for example, or how mediocre Dan's offenses at UF were. So many here are obsessed with running every play because they care more about feeling "more physical" than they actually scoring, but good offenses scheme receivers open in a way Dan never could.
4) actual coaching. Lebby lost us the game last night due to this, nobody will deny it. But Dan also choked every big game he had so he's not the answer if we fire Lebby for this reason.
Overall, you Dan lovers are caught up in nostalgia and the safety of consistent 7-5 seasons. That looks great when you're current reality is no SEC wins, but it isn't what we should aspire to have.
For a little nostalgia, click on page 1748 in this forum. It’s right after a shitty AU team beat us by 24 pts. Go look at how many ppl wanted Dan gone. Dan was quoted “Well, we won the 2nd half.”
Mullen was great at evaluating talent.
People in this hoard say Mullen would be bad during NIL era.
I see it the opposite. I think he?d be great. He?d have to look at transfer portal guys and find ones who can be good. He seems great at that to me.
Wanting Dan back is like wanting to re-marry your x-wife. No thanks.
Remember, Mullen left here because he thought he was too big for us. Did you hear him ya..yaaa, you know...you know...you know..yah when he arrived at Florida? No you didn't. He trained for the Boston Marathon on our campus as our HC. You think he would have tried that at Florida? I think he's a good coach but he'd have to be desperate to come back here because he knows it would be a lot harder to win now.
It's not even close for him coming back, that ship sailed a long time ago. I was a fan of DM, it didn't bother me as much as many for him trying to get another job because we were winning. Seems strange he hasn't gotten another top HC job, I don't think he has ever been nor will be a top candidate for some reason. I think he rubs folks the wrong way.
Tater seems to be a good one
To Trap and state 7, I forgot to thank you guys for your comments yesterday. They really made me laugh, and I needed that.
Lebby took over a massive chit-show. And we're now competitive and a play away from winning big games. By the end of the season, I may feel differently. But, it would be an absolute disaster of a decision to part ways with him before this season is over.
Mullen wore his welcome out in Starkville. He had everything handed to him and spit on it to leave for greener pastures. Great decision... His arrogance won't work here anymore.
Time stamps are important here. I posted this from Gainesville too so 1 am sat night as I was leaving bars.
Let he who has not wished for an ex in that situation amongst us cast the first stone at me.
You guys are insane. If Shapen drops two passes 4 yards shorter while staring down a guy in his face, we win that by 12 pts and everyone is like Lebby is a genius. Not to mention the other one in the corner of the endzone.
He stands by his call. If Shapen delivered a ball to 2 different wide open receivers on that last play, we put 7 on the board with 20 seconds left.
I like that he stands by it, even if it was a shit call to ever let that ball get into the air once in FG range.
Shapen had a damn good day other than overthrowing 3 wide ass open TDs.
Lebby also said that KT has the green light to throw it. KT is making the call to run.
Everyone needs to calm down. We beat TX this weekend. Book it.
I think he's one that got into a month long timeout along with me and a couple others so he's naturally gonna be a little saltier than most. Oh well.
It'd be real miserable to talk sports with anyone if I let their opinions on politics shape my opinion of their sports knowledge. But for some people that's all that matters these days. That's why I deleted most social medias that can have any algorithm to radicalize us. Elitedawgs and sports forum boards don't have those unnatural promotion of radical topics.