Those three are being mentioned as the top candidates for our job. Which do you prefer and why?
All three are still coaching their team in the tournament so things should pick up soon when they're eliminated.
Printable View
Those three are being mentioned as the top candidates for our job. Which do you prefer and why?
All three are still coaching their team in the tournament so things should pick up soon when they're eliminated.
I don't know anything about any of them but I just assume Cohen picks the best recruiter.
I'd go McMahon
Don't know much about all 3 but seem to prefer McMahan over Jans because of his incident in the past..
Pretty sure a bigger fish is going to grab McMahon after he is done in the Tourney so I wouldnt get too excited about him.
Here's homework for all 3...
McMahon:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matt_McMahon_(basketball)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kWoOxTcquKE
Jans:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Jans
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mNtlTP0tV_g
Golden:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Todd_Golden
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=glvlF88771U
Jans
LSU is bigger fish but no matter how toothless you think the NCAA is now, surely coaches will be a little hesitant jumping into that. It's not like LSU is some basketball powerhouse where coaches will take it regardless.
Mizzou should be a better basketball school than us but they just seem broken since joining the SEC. USCe I would agree is viewed as better. They do have the downside of competing against the ACC for recruits. At least if we have good talent that is local, it's usually a pretty decent haul for them to go to a basketball blue blood. But probably not a big enough deal to change the general consensus much as far as comparative desirability of the programs.
Delete