Rant that are saying they shouldn't claim that one. Get on it Cohen. I don't care what the others say, if A&M claim 1939, we can claim '41.
Rant that are saying they shouldn't claim that one. Get on it Cohen. I don't care what the others say, if A&M claim 1939, we can claim '41.
Alabama should just drop the claim to 1941 and that be the end of it. Houlgate system name Alabama the NC that year. Texas was named by some one else.
Minnesota was named the AP NC that year. Rightfully so, as they were undefeated and untied.
But what a weird year by today's standards. Bama lost to State and Vandy. State lost to Duquesne.
We should claim 1940 unironically. Us claiming 1941 would just be a troll at Alabama (which has merit too, don't get me wrong).
Concur, I've said this for 20 years. I'd would be cringe worthy at first, but in a couple of weeks, it'd all go away and we could have it on the stadium the next season.
Give the trophy to the Japanese ZERO fighter plane powered by Mitsubishi.
I'll see if I can't make this happen, guys...
Tell ya what, I'll lobby for a transfer of the '41 NC to you cats in exchange for both the '66 & '77 NCs...
And, as a show of good faith, I'll toss in a Kicker and LT to be named later....
Minnesota is the rightful owners of it.
Bama ain't going to modify that # total they have on everything. Not happening.Quote:
Originally Posted by TUSK
Bama has more controversial NC that their total number would go down not up. Lots of funny stuff went on back then.
Restaurant qualityQuote:
Originally Posted by TUSK
Sold!!! Not sure we deserve it but wished we could have played another game to try to improve our record. But I'll take one NC for y'all to net one more. Would be a big deal for us not so much for y'all. That LT and kicker intrigues me the most!! But this next tackle can't be a false start machine like last one! ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by TUSK