Why

Why was Forbes not in on the 4th and 10?

I think he got dinged up the play before I thought I saw him limp
Off.

Good Question.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BuckyIsAB****

Why was Forbes not in on the 4th and 10?

---

I'm not saying he was but we did have some times we have all 3 corners on the field

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Homedawg

I'm not saying he was but we did have some times we have all 3 corners on the field

---

They went at Richardson for a reason

Yeah, Richardson got targeted there.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BuckyIsAB****

They went at Richardson for a reason

---

I'm not disagreeing w that. I'm saying I think Forbes was on the field. But not positive. But I know we had Forbes and Emerson on the same side a lot today. I'm sure on their best two receivers.

I?m surprised we didn?t bring pressure on that 4th and 10

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by William Tecumsah Sherman

I?m surprised we didn?t bring pressure on that 4th and 10

---

Me too. I was expecting heat but we played a little to soft of a zone.

Arnett probably didn't want to get burned like he did against Georgia. I guess?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by William Tecumsah Sherman

I?m surprised we didn?t bring pressure on that 4th and 10

---

I would have sent the damn house. To hell with it. play man and tell everyone else to bull rush. Their O line was gassed and in the 4th alot of times we were blowing right through their line. No reason at all not to blitz on that play....

*I know i would not be a good D-coordinator. I would get burned way to much blitzing, but damn it man its fun...