Originally Posted by
smootness
I think Murphy should be in the HOF, but it's not a slam-dunk case. He is penalized in the same way Andruw Jones is, that there's something that makes his numbers seem lesser (for Murphy, that his peak came in the dead-ball 80s, for Andruw that it was primarily his defense and he played in the steroid era) and he tailed off so much once he hit his early 30s.
Andruw deserves it more than Murphy, but Murphy probably does deserve it as well. From 1980 to 88, he was great most years, only occasionally simply 'good'.