http://www.espn.com/mens-college-bas...l/bracketology
Last Four in:
Louisville- 40
USC- 27
Baylor- 63
Texas- 54
Last Four Out:
Syracuse- 46
UCLA- 52
Nebraska- 57
State- 62
Next Four Out:
Washington- 51
Boise State- 45
Utah- 55
Notre Dame- 68
Printable View
http://www.espn.com/mens-college-bas...l/bracketology
Last Four in:
Louisville- 40
USC- 27
Baylor- 63
Texas- 54
Last Four Out:
Syracuse- 46
UCLA- 52
Nebraska- 57
State- 62
Next Four Out:
Washington- 51
Boise State- 45
Utah- 55
Notre Dame- 68
We have to win tomorrow night and I just don't think we can beat Tennessee
Louisville is 9-7 in conference and 8th currently
Baylor is 7-9 and tied for 7th
Texas is 7-9 and tied for 7th
USC is 12-5 and 2nd in the Pac-12
UCLA is 4th at 10-7
Syracuse is 10th in the ACC at 7-9
Nebraska is 13-5 and 5th
State is 9-7 and tied for 3rd
I think we win tomorrow and lose to LSU on the roadQuote:
Originally Posted by preachermatt83
Interesting, what makes you say that? Their last 3 road games are an 8-point win over a garbage OM team, and big losses to UGA and Bama, both of whom are thoroughly mediocre. Even their most recent home games are close wins over Florida and SC. They don't seem like a typical top-20 team, at least not right now.Quote:
Originally Posted by preachermatt83
None of this really matters at all.Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach34
I totally agree with this. I like our chances tomorrow night with the way we've been playing and finding ways to win not to mention that 18-1 at home doesn't happen by accident even if the out of conference home schedule was weak. LSU is a trap game if I've ever seen one.Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach34
If this were to happen, it absolutely would not be a guarantee we'd be in.Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach34
I think we win both
I think we're dancing in March....boy has it been awhile.
It's a big game for Tennessee, but I like our chances. We will not lose to LSU on their Senior Night.Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach34
Winning Saturday was huge for our team. I see it as a step forward in that we pulled out the close game and stayed focused throughout. Coach Howland is performing at a high level, and the team is following his lead.
so the **** what? I posted it anyway. Deal with it dickheadQuote:
Originally Posted by smootness
Texas .. @kansas , West Virginia.
Baylor .. Oklahoma , @ k state
Louisville .. Virginia , Nc State
USC .. UCLA
Nebraska..Conference tournery
ND.. Pitt , Virginia
Boise St. @ SD state, Wyoming
The last four in have a tough road. I don’t see any of them going 2-0 and we should jump USC by going 2-0 our next 2 . We have no room for error that’s for sure. 2-0 gets us in the last 4 for sure maybe even Higher which would be huge.
A lot then will depend on the conference tourneys . Upsets, teams going deep in tourneys, quality wins in tourneys Ect..
It absolutely matters. And the four teams above the last 4 matter..Quote:
Originally Posted by smootness
Their ability to hit 3s concerns me. I also have no confidence our post guys can guard Williams. On the other side, I watched tyree (OM) drive at will vs Tennessee. We have 2 guards better at driving than tyree. Peters and nick should have a really nice offensive gameQuote:
Originally Posted by smootness
Then we better win the while SECT or it's NIT for us.Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach34
The heck? Haha, you offered some data, I said it won't matter in regard to NCAA selection, which was the topic of the thread. That's it. I wasn't angry or trying to shove anything in your face. But you seem reasonable.Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach34
OM held Williams to 6pts on 3/10 shooting. He's a very good player but he's not invincible. He may score 20 but 2 out of his last 3 games he's scored 5 & 6 points. It's doable.Quote:
Originally Posted by msstate7
I just mean in regard to standing in respective conferences. The committee has said publicly that it doesn't matter, and all the experts on this say that it doesn't matter. It's only fans saying it does matter. That tells me it likely doesn't matter.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ari Gold
Dang right it does, that’s who we are competing with for at-large bids.. why wouldn’t it matter.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ari Gold
Just wondering, is Lunardi so accurate because he’s smarter than everyone else and computers, or is it because the committee just uses his bracket for the tourney minus any changes?