Originally Posted by
War Machine Dawg
Hull is in the same damn boat. I'll admit, I've kinda become a Man City fan and started watching them more than Hull. All their games seem to be on DirecTV even against the shitty teams. Hull, not so much.
That said, Hull had a decent start to the season and made everyone think they'd be a solid team. Now they're in the relegation zone. Hull won on Boxing (not Boxer) Day against Sunderland. Then they followed it up by dropping a very winnable game against TheRef's Leicester City Foxes. I don't expect much for them in the upcoming transfer window, as our owner has put the club up for sale and stated he won't put any more money into the team since the name change was rejected. We just recalled Tom Ince and one other cat from loan and all signs indicate we'll part ways with Hatem Ben Arfa and Yannick Sagbo. Basically, we're just playing really shitty football and it's been compounded by injuries to some key guys like Michael Dawson. I still think there's enough talent on the team to avoid relegation, but it's not looking good.
Worst part? I could definitely see myself being a Hull fan if they were just a solid mid-table team. They seem to be a lot like State over the years - a club with plenty of potential that's been screwed by awful management. But what drives me nuts are the psycho fans who seem to think it's sacrilege to change the name of the club from Hull City to Hull. I mean, the name of the city where the club is located is Hull, not Hull City, dammit. If it broadens your potential for new revenue streams, why make such a big damn deal out of it, fracture the fan base, and piss off the best owner in franchise history? Just craziness over there.