But he doesn?t want to show that it took so long to play Him. I don?t know is he just hard headed or stupid. Might be both. The Texas game might have been proof he is just a dumbass.
Printable View
But he doesn?t want to show that it took so long to play Him. I don?t know is he just hard headed or stupid. Might be both. The Texas game might have been proof he is just a dumbass.
I was thinking Shapen negotiated not being benched into his NIL deal, or had pics of Lebby
Jeff Moorhead
Hard headed and stupid are synonymous.
Moorhead was better than 1-15
I feel like we are being trolled.. nothing about last night made any sense to me.
How stupid are you when first and goal from the 2 . Fluff or Shapen. And you go with Shapen.
Lebby wouldn't guarantee MVB the starter for Shapen so it's possible him coming back as the starter was negotiated.
The issue is KT has the same OL as Shapen. KT is averaging more sacks per passing play than Shapen. It's close, but still more. Putting him back there does not help or improve us with this OL. What it can do is kill his confidence and get him injured.
If Shapen had KTs plays, his sack numbers would be way higher. Our TDs would be lower too. Look at the TDs per play for KT. It is way up there compared to Shapen. I'm not sure I buy the sacks thing. KT running and TFL is not the same as a sack. He hasn't taken many true sacks.
I have no idea how to post a picture or link on here ir I would do it. But according to all the info I've gathered.. Shapen is sacked 10.4% of the time on drop backs while KT is sacked 5.3% of the time. It is calculated by a players total passing attempts and total sacks. So no KT isn'tsacked at a higher rate.. and it's not even close.
Kamario has a touchdown percentage per play of 16%. Shapens is 4.4%. But that is skewed due to KT coming in during red zone plays so it actually helps his percentage alot. But even if you ignore the numbers, in my eyes KT is the guy. He passes the eye test for sure and it's just obvious. People will argue that tho.