PDA

View Full Version : We must have declined a WNIT bid



Quaoarsking
03-13-2022, 08:57 PM
https://womensnit.com/news/2022/3/13/general-2022-postseason-wnit-field-announced.aspx

Our resume at 15-14/6-10/60 NET would have certainly gotten us in, especially when Vanderbilt got in at 14-18/4-12/77 NET.

I can understand not wanting to give it a go with 7 players and 0 home arenas, but it might have been nice to have a few more practices. The WNIT run we had in 2014 really set the table for Schafer's magical years.

EdwardDrayton
03-13-2022, 09:27 PM
https://womensnit.com/news/2022/3/13/general-2022-postseason-wnit-field-announced.aspx

Our resume at 15-14/6-10/60 NET would have certainly gotten us in, especially when Vanderbilt got in at 14-18/4-12/77 NET.

I can understand not wanting to give it a go with 7 players and 0 home arenas, but it might have been nice to have a few more practices. The WNIT run we had in 2014 really set the table for Schafer's magical years.

Sure would have enjoyed watching them play once more.

CaptainObvious
03-13-2022, 11:05 PM
Rumor(often encouraged true or not) Is that State only has 6 available players and so could not accept a bid.

Cooterpoot
03-14-2022, 01:55 AM
Should've declined the men's too with all the change that's coming and no home games. It's a pointless tournament this year.

Jack Lambert
03-14-2022, 08:53 AM
Hard to believe that any D1 much less a P5 conference team would only have 7 players. Talk about falling off the map.