View Full Version : Why
BuckyIsAB****
09-04-2021, 07:06 PM
Why was Forbes not in on the 4th and 10?
Commercecomet24
09-04-2021, 07:08 PM
I think he got dinged up the play before I thought I saw him limp
Off.
Lance Harbor
09-04-2021, 07:08 PM
Good Question.
Homedawg
09-04-2021, 07:19 PM
Why was Forbes not in on the 4th and 10?
I'm not saying he was but we did have some times we have all 3 corners on the field
BuckyIsAB****
09-04-2021, 07:37 PM
I'm not saying he was but we did have some times we have all 3 corners on the field
They went at Richardson for a reason
KOdawg1
09-04-2021, 07:41 PM
Yeah, Richardson got targeted there.
Homedawg
09-04-2021, 10:46 PM
They went at Richardson for a reason
I'm not disagreeing w that. I'm saying I think Forbes was on the field. But not positive. But I know we had Forbes and Emerson on the same side a lot today. I'm sure on their best two receivers.
William Tecumsah Sherman
09-04-2021, 11:14 PM
I?m surprised we didn?t bring pressure on that 4th and 10
Commercecomet24
09-04-2021, 11:15 PM
I?m surprised we didn?t bring pressure on that 4th and 10
Me too. I was expecting heat but we played a little to soft of a zone.
Todd4State
09-04-2021, 11:19 PM
Arnett probably didn't want to get burned like he did against Georgia. I guess?
TNDawg35
09-04-2021, 11:59 PM
I?m surprised we didn?t bring pressure on that 4th and 10
I would have sent the damn house. To hell with it. play man and tell everyone else to bull rush. Their O line was gassed and in the 4th alot of times we were blowing right through their line. No reason at all not to blitz on that play....
*I know i would not be a good D-coordinator. I would get burned way to much blitzing, but damn it man its fun...
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.