PDA

View Full Version : Napier vs Hud recruiting



Lumpy Chucklelips
01-05-2020, 06:54 PM
Had a thought to go check recruiting rankings between the two while at ULL.

Instead of looking whether one finished higher ranked at the end of the year nationally or even in the Sun Belt, I looked at the rating per player. To me, that gives you a better idea of who did better in a head to head look such as this. If you say Hud finished 74th in the country in 2013 and Nape finished 78th in 2018, that really doesn't give you an idea of their recruiting prowess. When you break it down by individual player, that shows you who did a better job player vs player.

Hud had 6 recruiting classes. Napier had 3, counting this years just signed. I'll break it down by year and then individual player ranking. You can see how each progressed from one year to the next. Of course Hud had the NCAA troubles that affected his midstream, but it still counts.

Like I said, just a thought to pass the time until Monken is named the head guy. Yes, that's a joke. I hope.

Hud
2012--- 76.24
2013--- 80.05
2014--- 76.72
2015--- 80.17
2016--- 78.46
2017--- 78.52

Napier
2018--- 80.01
2019--- 81.96
2020--- 83.02

weblow
01-05-2020, 06:55 PM
https://twitter.com/joeltcoleman/status/1213953522028490752?s=21

Lumpy Chucklelips
01-05-2020, 06:58 PM
https://twitter.com/joeltcoleman/status/1213953522028490752?s=21

This was not meant to say Hud was a candidate. Just to take a look at their head to head recruiting since they recruited at the same school. To me, it would be disappointing if we hired Napier and Hud outrecruited him while at ULL.

PGHBulldogBG
01-05-2020, 07:12 PM
I am just not understanding how any of these names mentioned are any better than Hud. It?s not like we are mentioning successful coaches in power 5 conferences. Gene Chizik a proven failure? Or triple option coaches? If we really hire this Chizik clown over Hud that?s absurd

gravedigger
01-05-2020, 07:34 PM
I am just not understanding how any of these names mentioned are any better than Hud. It?s not like we are mentioning successful coaches in power 5 conferences. Gene Chizik a proven failure? Or triple option coaches? If we really hire this Chizik clown over Hud that?s absurd

Yes you do. You know Hud was involved in a major recruiting scandal. You know we are on probation. He isnt a candidate due to that fact.

ckDOG
01-05-2020, 07:35 PM
I am just not understanding how any of these names mentioned are any better than Hud. It?s not like we are mentioning successful coaches in power 5 conferences. Gene Chizik a proven failure? Or triple option coaches? If we really hire this Chizik clown over Hud that?s absurd

Well, this thread is pretty objectively stating that Napier is a better recruiter than Hud, so there's a start in clearing up your misunderstanding.

Y'all have to get over Hud. He's not even getting an interview. I don't care if the NCAA cleared him from the Saunders stuff. A school that is on probation for academic fraud is not hiring a guy even loosely associate with that

The Federalist Engineer
01-05-2020, 07:50 PM
Is Gene Chizik even a candidate or are we just talking worst case scenario?

Like Reynaldo Sydney at the S/C coach, Croom as OC, Hugh Freeze, Terry Bowden, Tommy Tuberville, Manny D?az, Les Miles

We should start a thread for nightmare candidates