LSU beats KY on an offensive goal tending bucket as time expires...

[maroonmania]

SEC refs would not have allowed MSU a win over KY in that manner in a million years.

[RocketDawg]

You're right, it would not have been good had it been us doing it, but it was good nevertheless. Good win by LSU.

[Dawg-gone-dawgs]

Kentucky got screwed and I LOVE IT!!!!!!

[RocketDawg]

I don't think they were screwed. Wasn't goal tending.

[LC Dawg]

Kentucky got screwed and I LOVE IT!!!!!!
How did they get screwed?

[TNDawg35]

That was legit. But KY lost... what else matters??

[Dawg-gone-dawgs]

How did they get screwed?

If was offensive goal tending. Pretty obvious

[LC Dawg]

If was offensive goal tending. Pretty obvious

It definitely wasn't obvious.

[Dawg-gone-dawgs]

It definitely wasn't obvious.

So the ball can be in the cylinder and be messed with?

[Leeshouldveflanked]

It definitely wasn't obvious.

The only place that wasn’t offensive goal tending is Europe or Olympics.

[LC Dawg]

So the ball can be in the cylinder and be messed with?

I don't think it was in the cylinder. Really don't care. I enjoy seeing Kentucky get beat.

[Dawg-gone-dawgs]

I enjoy seeing Kentucky get beat.

That was kind of my point but there are those in every crowd....

[LC Dawg]

That was kind of my point but there are those in every crowd....

Good talk.

[RougeDawg]

It definitely wasn't obvious.

Yes. It was as obvious as the PI in the rams saints game.

[RougeDawg]

I don't think it was in the cylinder. Really don't care. I enjoy seeing Kentucky get beat.

It?s not a matter of you thinking it was or it was not. Facts and video dont lie, no matter how much you want to think something was.

[MrKotter]

Yes. It was as obvious as the PI in the rams saints game.

It was not goal tending. Plainly obvious it wasn?t

[RiverCityDawg]

It was not goal tending. Plainly obvious it wasn?t

If you don't think that was goaltending you are either blind or do not know the rule. It was textbook goaltending.

[maroonmania]

I don't think it was in the cylinder. Really don't care. I enjoy seeing Kentucky get beat.

Good grief, some of you people just want to argue. I'm glad to see KY get beat also but that ball was pushed back in with nearly half the ball still in the cylinder. OBVIOUS goaltend per the rules that would have been called if we had done that especially against KY.

[maroonmania]

It was not goal tending. Plainly obvious it wasn?t

I have an optometrist I can recommend.

[MarketingBully]

It was offensive basket interference because it was still in the cylinder but they couldn’t review that. They could only review that he touched it before the clock expired.

[MarketingBully]

It’s okay because LSU is going to get hammered. LSU is buying Watford this year. They bought Reid, Williams, and Days last year.

[ShotgunDawg]

This is not in the cylinder.

It was not a goal tend.

https://twitter.com/SBNationCBB/status/1095511163926970369

[Renardo Sidney]

FullSizeRender.jpg
Kentucky player had a hand inside the rim on the shot so it?s even

[Homedawg]

SEC refs would not have allowed MSU a win over KY in that manner in a million years.

If you look closely uk had a defensive goaltending first. Now I agree it was tougher to see, but Washington reaches through the basket and touched the rim. So there's that.

[Homedawg]

This is not in the cylinder.

It was not a goal tend.

https://twitter.com/SBNationCBB/status/1095511163926970369

Sorry shotgun, but in college basketball the cylinder is upward to the roof. It doesn't have to be literally touching the rim. If there were replay and uk hadn't goal tended first, which I say they did, that basket doesn't count.

[Homedawg]

It would be simpler if they went to international rule that if it's not on the rim, it's good to touch. But that's not how it is at present.

[maroonmania]

If you look closely uk had a defensive goaltending first. Now I agree it was tougher to see, but Washington reaches through the basket and touched the rim. So there's that.

Yes, agree with that.

[Renardo Sidney]

https://i.postimg.cc/QxMQbqxC/5346-A36-D-31-D0-4-BC3-845-F-91-E9-BE57-A3-CB.jpg

[maroonmania]

This is not in the cylinder.

It was not a goal tend.

https://twitter.com/SBNationCBB/status/1095511163926970369

Not sure what is going on with people tonight but the picture you have shows that clearly AT LEAST 1/3 of the ball is in the cylinder. The rule is if ANY part of the ball is in the cylinder its basket interference. If a defender grabbed the ball from that position LSU fans would have gone nuts. The rule is NOT that the ENTIRE ball must be in the cylinder. They just let a lot of it go these days because so much of basketball is played above the rim but that is CLEAR textbook offensive basket interference.

[Dawgcap]

If I understand what was said, you can only review the time not the offensive goaltend but as a State fan they would of ruled it off

[Homedawg]

Not sure what is going on with people tonight but the picture you have shows that clearly AT LEAST 1/3 of the ball is in the cylinder. The rule is if ANY part of the ball is in the cylinder its basket interference. If a defender grabbed the ball from that position LSU fans would have gone nuts. The rule is NOT that the ENTIRE ball must be in the cylinder. They just let a lot of it go these days because so much of basketball is played above the rim but that is CLEAR textbook offensive basket interference.

Correct, which took place right after the defensive goal tending. LSU wins. Bad call twice by the officials. Bet result, the correct team won

[Homedawg]

If I understand what was said, you can only review the time not the offensive goaltend but as a State fan they would of ruled it off


No they wouldn't. Not based on the clock no.

[Dawgcap]

No they wouldn't. Not based on the clock no.

I don’t think a offensive goaltending is reviewable

[Homedawg]

I don’t think a offensive goaltending is reviewable

Neither are reviewable. Offensive or defensive. So back to my original point
All the ref were looking at was did the shot get off. Period. Nothing else was reviewable

[Skydawg1]

Not sure what is going on with people tonight but the picture you have shows that clearly AT LEAST 1/3 of the ball is in the cylinder. The rule is if ANY part of the ball is in the cylinder its basket interference. If a defender grabbed the ball from that position LSU fans would have gone nuts. The rule is NOT that the ENTIRE ball must be in the cylinder. They just let a lot of it go these days because so much of basketball is played above the rim but that is CLEAR textbook offensive basket interference.That clears it up for me. I see that shot and say "the ball is OUTSIDE the rim" (half of the ball). ANY part of the ball...got it.

[Dawgcap]

It was sarcasm but if we tip that in some other rule comes under effect but then again offensive goaltending is called initially! Can’t believe LSU even got that call at Rupp

[Dawgcap]

Neither are reviewable. Offensive or defensive. So back to my original point
All the ref were looking at was did the shot get off. Period. Nothing else was reviewable

We actually agree more than you think!! Haha But if we tipped that against Kentucky or any other SEC school I bet offensive goaltending was called. No need for review then! That’s my pessimist view

[RougeDawg]

It was not goal tending. Plainly obvious it wasn?t

Ha ha ha ha. Every commentator and talking head said it was offensive goal tending. Even the overhead camera angle provides indisputable video evidence.

[shannondawg]

As many times as we got screwed by bad calls playing them, I hope no one is feeling sorry for those 17ers whether it was a bad call or not.