Targeting rule might be changed by the NCAA

[RocketDawg]

Looking to have two categories: intentional and unintentional. Intentional would remain as now, but unintentional would only be a 15 yard penalty. That makes a lot more sense than the current rule.

[Liverpooldawg]

Looking to have two categories: intentional and unintentional. Intentional would remain as now, but unintentional would only be a 15 yard penalty. That makes a lot more sense than the current rule.

Logical, but very hard to actually enforce.

[msstate7]

They gonna hook em up to a lie detector test?

[starkvegasdawg]

Might as well describe it as targeting against a an elite team is current penalty. An elite team targeting a regular team is just 15 yards...if it's called at all.

[TUSK]

Might as well describe it as targeting against a an elite team is current penalty. An elite team targeting a regular team is just 15 yards...if it's called at all.

Wait a minute... Are you saying that these rule changes come with the possibility that Bammer might get a penalty called on them????

Hold my beer, I gotta make a phone call.*

[parabrave]

Wait a minute... Are you saying that these rule changes come with the possibility that Bammer might get a penalty called on them????

Hold my beer, I gotta make a phone call.*

Now you know that will never happen. Just like Bama receivers are still eligible even after they go out of bounds on their own accord.

[Mjoelner34]

Wait a minute... Are you saying that these rule changes come with the possibility that Bammer might get a penalty called on them????

Hold my beer, I gotta make a phone call.*

Not until the bowl game.

[BuckyIsAB****]

Looking to have two categories: intentional and unintentional. Intentional would remain as now, but unintentional would only be a 15 yard penalty. That makes a lot more sense than the current rule.

Sounds really dumb. Either it is or it aint. If it aint it should be overturned no penalty no nothing play ball.

I remember the days when if it hit the ground it was incomplete and if you got hit you got hit. Nothing vicious about it

[Leroy Jenkins]

I don't see how you can leave the rule up to deciphering "intent". Seems like a recipe for confusion and consternation.

[Ari Gold]

That’s progress... But I’m sure replay will screw it up more times than not

[Political Hack]

They can change the rules every year and it still won't change the fact that we're mostly State and Saints fans. The eternal screwing will continue.

[dawgday166]

Wait a minute... Are you saying that these rule changes come with the possibility that Bammer might get a penalty called on them????

Hold my beer, I gotta make a phone call.*

SMH ...not hardly.

[Dawg-gone-dawgs]

Looking to have two categories: intentional and unintentional. Intentional would remain as now, but unintentional would only be a 15 yard penalty. That makes a lot more sense than the current rule.

something else to evaluate during a long ass review.....geezus