PDA

View Full Version : Why was #3 ejected?


DanDority
11-22-2018, 10:57 PM
Maybe I missed what he did, but Aj and Abram should've been. I know why Gay was because it was his 2 unsportsmanlike penalty. But I didn't see Camron do anything on t.v.
TXDawg
11-22-2018, 11:02 PM
Because they misread almost all of the numbers.

Abram threw the first punch that started the brawl. Brown (UMiss) retaliated and punched him back. Corral and Peters fought each other. Abram, Brown, and Corral remained in the game, but they ejected #3 for us and #38 for UMiss.

Very likely that the NCAA will review the tape next week and correct the ejections going forward.
Goldendawg
11-22-2018, 11:04 PM
Kind of ironic for UM, their 38 is the Chucky Mullins award winner and he was tossed.
RocketDawg
11-22-2018, 11:06 PM
Somebody posted a few days ago that Abrams would get ejected after 3 quarters. And they would have been exactly right if the refs had got the numbers right.
Statecoachingblows**
11-22-2018, 11:07 PM
Kind of solidifies all the complaints about SEC officials video should be pretty easy to get the call right but....
maroonmania
11-22-2018, 11:08 PM
Why was Peters ejected but the OM QB wasn't?
Goldendawg
11-22-2018, 11:13 PM
You could also see AJ was afraid he was going to get ejected and he should have. Wonder if the PROs will notice how he was shut down very often by good CB's?
civildawg
11-22-2018, 11:17 PM
Peters ejection was premature**
Commercecomet24
11-22-2018, 11:18 PM
38 for unm never left the bench lol. They got the numbers all wrong. It should've been 1 and 2 for unm and Peters and abram for us. Oh and Gay too for his earlier penalty
Goldendawg
11-22-2018, 11:20 PM
38 for unm never left the bench lol. They got the numbers all wrong. It should've been 1 and 2 for unm and Peters and abram for us. Oh and Gay too for his earlier penalty

Agree, but can the SEC office review film and apply corrections or further punishment?
Commercecomet24
11-22-2018, 11:22 PM
Agree, but can the SEC office review film and apply corrections or further punishment?

Good question.
Lord McBuckethead
11-22-2018, 11:34 PM
Agree, but can the SEC office review film and apply corrections or further punishment?

SEC can't review shit correctly. If I were Cohen, I would be on the phone tonight demanding the SEC doesn't do anything ither than over ruling all the ejections. Make up for that Bama 17 up situation. Thats fair.
yjnkdawg
11-22-2018, 11:38 PM
Agree, but can the SEC office review film and apply corrections or further punishment?


I could see the SEC possibly stepping in adding a player, or players to the ejection list, but not apply any corrections. Doing that would make SEC officiating more stupid and inept looking than it already was. I imagine the SEC Office will just let it go based on what was called on the field.