PDA

View Full Version : Dear Sankey



gravedigger
11-10-2018, 05:17 PM
What the committee should do is shun the sec from the playoff. If our replay and field refs am are going to go to this length to protect a team, they should punish our conference for it.

dawgday166
11-10-2018, 05:19 PM
Good post +1.

DanDority
11-10-2018, 05:25 PM
It took a Loud mouthed cajun to expose the blatant bias towards ulabama

Quaoarsking
11-10-2018, 05:27 PM
Nick Saban probably doesn't even want this special treatment. It's not like he needs it.

gravedigger
11-10-2018, 05:31 PM
Nick Saban probably doesn't even want this special treatment. It's not like he needs it.

Agreed. But these assclowns have now disgraced the conference. It looks fixed even if it?s not. The appearance alone will give pundits across the country a legitimate claim that we protect teams.

DanDority
11-10-2018, 05:39 PM
No doubt!

Novoodoo
11-10-2018, 05:40 PM
[QUOTE=Quaoarsking;1022661]Nick Saban probably doesn't even want this special treatment. It's not like he needs it.[/QUOTE

I think the same officiating crew called a junior high call Thursday. They were terrible there too.
Dawgs need to step it up and play like they are capable of playing. Mistakes all around - muffed punts, dropped passes, taking sacks. We are better than this - even against a team as talented and well-coached as Alabama

Leroy Jenkins
11-10-2018, 05:44 PM
Nevermind

gravedigger
11-10-2018, 05:49 PM
Is Fitz mentally slow? Like "slow"?

No. He just doesn?t have the mind of a qb that runs anything other than Mullen?s or his high school offense.

parabrave
11-10-2018, 06:11 PM
No Sankey don't need to worry about what the media or others think but of some of the refs future health concerns.

Lumpy Chucklelips
11-10-2018, 06:18 PM
Steve said ref that called block in back was same ref who picked up flag on Ridley when he went out of bounds last year and came back in and caught TD.

LC Dawg
11-10-2018, 06:27 PM
Nick Saban probably doesn't even want this special treatment. It's not like he needs it.

No, he wants it. In fact, he demands it.

Madisonmd
11-10-2018, 06:30 PM
Seriously, this officiating borders on criminal. I've tried to be open minded about it in past, but there is too much money involved. This bias is beyond discreet!! it makes one just not want to watch!!

Coursesuper
11-10-2018, 07:12 PM
Seriously, this officiating borders on criminal. I've tried to be open minded about it in past, but there is too much money involved. This bias is beyond discreet!! it makes one just not want to watch!!

Finally someone gets it! This is all about the money period.

AlSwearengen
11-10-2018, 07:54 PM
Yeah, bama doesn’t need help, especially this year. Those assholes were praying that Moorhead didn’t challenge the fumble early in the game. It would have been interesting if he had forced their hand.

Coursesuper
11-10-2018, 07:57 PM
Yeah, bama doesn’t need help, especially this year. Those assholes were praying that Moorhead didn’t challenge the fumble early in the game. It would have been interesting if he had forced their hand.

It shouldn’t ever come to a coach having to challenge a play with s potential turnovers. Any competent official should have the nuts to step up and stop the game to look the play period. This is the issue.

hobiedawg
11-10-2018, 08:00 PM
Z
Yeah, bama doesn’t need help, especially this year. Those assholes were praying that Moorhead didn’t challenge the fumble early in the game. It would have been interesting if he had forced their hand.

“After further review, the play stands as called.”

tcdog70
11-10-2018, 08:02 PM
It shouldn’t ever come to a coach having to challenge a play with s potential turnovers. Any competent official should have the nuts to step up and stop the game to look the play period. This is the issue.

Have you seen a game this year where a possible fumble occurs when they don't look at it? Most games if it is even close they look.

gravedigger
11-10-2018, 08:05 PM
Have you seen a game this year where a possible fumble occurs when they don't look at it? Most games if it is even close they look.

Correct. If the explanation is the coach should use a time out to challenge then the coach should ask for the refs pay for doing his job for him. That includes the replay office in Birmingham

RocketDawg
11-10-2018, 08:14 PM
Have you seen a game this year where a possible fumble occurs when they don't look at it? Most games if it is even close they look.

Just a couple of weeks ago Central Florida possibly won a game because they didn't review a catch that was out of bounds. Apparently that conference protects their favorites too.

Coursesuper
11-10-2018, 08:17 PM
Have you seen a game this year where a possible fumble occurs when they don't look at it? Most games if it is even close they look.

Exactly, what I'm talking about. The officiating wasn't even close to competent.

32 Dive
11-10-2018, 08:35 PM
Finally someone gets it! This is all about the money period.

More than we will ever know...