Vacated wins

[Back Judge]

Not that it means alot in the grand scheme, but do you thing that any vacated wins will be part of the penalty handed down by the NCAA for Ole Miss? The "we beat Bama twice...blah, blah, blah...Sugar Bowl" drivel may lose a little of its luter when/if they get vacated.

[Political Hack]

It's already lost its luster considering... but yeah, they'll be vacated in all likelihood.

[TrapGame]

Yeah, but, I've got a couple of om freaks on FB that say even if they did cheat to get the players those players beat Bama. You can take away the wins but those ass clowns will still claim them.

[TUSK]

I can think of two that’ll be vacated...

[thf24]

It does mean a lot in the grand scheme if bowl wins are vacated, because they'll have to pay back the money they received.

[MedDawg]

Not that it means alot in the grand scheme, but do you thing that any vacated wins will be part of the penalty handed down by the NCAA for Ole Miss? The "we beat Bama twice...blah, blah, blah...Sugar Bowl" drivel may lose a little of its luter when/if they get vacated.

that OM ineligible players for 2010 through 2013 and 6 games in the 2014 season, so I expect any wins during those years would be vacated (see below). I don't remember seeing anything about ineligible players during the 2015 season. The NOA's used the phrase "competed while ineligible":

From the 2017 NOA>>>>>
Student-Athlete 9?s], [Student-Athlete 10?s] and [Student-Athlete 11's] June 2010 ACT scores were used in their initial eligibility academic certifications. As a result, then practiced, competed and received athletically related financial aid from the institution while ineligible during the 2010-11 academic year. [Student-Athlete 11] also competed while ineligible during the 2011-12 through 2013-14 academic years. [NCAA Bylaws 14.1.2, 14.3.2.1, 14.3.2.1.1 and 15.01.5 (2010-11); 14.11.1 (2010-11 through 2012-13); and 14.10.1 (2013-14)

From the 2016 NOA>>>>>
Additionally, in October 2014, the institution's athletics compliance office learned that Cannon Motors loaned a 2012 Nissan Titan to [Student-Athlete 1] during the fall of 2014. However, the compliance office failed to adequately inquire into the circumstances surrounding [Student-Athlete 1?s]
acquisition and use of the vehicle, including the impact to [Student-Athlete 1's] eligibility. As a result, [Student-Athlete 1] competed while ineligible in six contests during the 2014 season.

[BrunswickDawg]

that OM ineligible players for 2010 through 2013 and 6 games in the 2014 season, so I expect any wins during those years would be vacated (see below). I don't remember seeing anything about ineligible players during the 2015 season. The NOA's used the phrase "competed while ineligible":

From the 2017 NOA>>>>>
Student-Athlete 9?s], [Student-Athlete 10?s] and [Student-Athlete 11's] June 2010 ACT scores were used in their initial eligibility academic certifications. As a result, then practiced, competed and received athletically related financial aid from the institution while ineligible during the 2010-11 academic year. [Student-Athlete 11] also competed while ineligible during the 2011-12 through 2013-14 academic years. [NCAA Bylaws 14.1.2, 14.3.2.1, 14.3.2.1.1 and 15.01.5 (2010-11); 14.11.1 (2010-11 through 2012-13); and 14.10.1 (2013-14)

From the 2016 NOA>>>>>
Additionally, in October 2014, the institution's athletics compliance office learned that Cannon Motors loaned a 2012 Nissan Titan to [Student-Athlete 1] during the fall of 2014. However, the compliance office failed to adequately inquire into the circumstances surrounding [Student-Athlete 1?s]
acquisition and use of the vehicle, including the impact to [Student-Athlete 1's] eligibility. As a result, [Student-Athlete 1] competed while ineligible in six contests during the 2014 season.

Wait - OM knew Tunsil had a loaner in October 2014, played him, then held him out in 2015 only after they knew they were busted? And now will have to vacate those wins. Laremy Tunsil is the gift that keeps on giving.

[drunkernhelldawg]

They won't stop talking about it regardless. I wouldn't. I bet you wouldn't either. To me, it's not about the record. It's about the game. If we win the game, we won. Then on to the next one. I just can't get up much fight over games that have already been played.

[starkvegasdawg]

Wait - OM knew Tunsil had a loaner in October 2014, played him, then held him out in 2015 only after they knew they were busted? And now will have to vacate those wins. Laremy Tunsil is the gift that keeps on giving.

I?d have to say, yeah.