An analysis: Did Ole Miss shave points?

[Quaoarsking]

After hearing rumors on a few different boards I decided to look into whether Ole Miss might have shaved points under Freeze. This is not a very detailed analysis, but an overview to see if the allegations are even plausible. I used the odds found on this website (http://www.oddsshark.com/stats/dbresults/football/ncaaf), which aren't the only set of odds out there, but the ones I was able to find the most easily.

I'll start with a list of all the games they played under Freeze, with the results. This will make it easier if anyone else wants to do an analysis.



Date
H/A
Opponent
Result
Margin
Line
Favored?
Beat spread?
O/U
Total Scored
O/U in Wins


Sep 1, 2012
H
CENTARK
W, 49-27
22
20
YES
YES
--
76



Sep 8, 2012
H
UTEP
W, 28-10
18
8
YES
YES
53.5
38
U


Sep 15, 2012
H
TEXAS
L, 66-31
-35
-10.5
NO

51
97



Sep 22, 2012
@
TULANE
W, 39-0
39
17.5
YES
YES
53
39
U


Sep 29, 2012
@
ALAB
L, 33-14
-19
-31
NO

52.5
47



Oct 6, 2012
H
TEXA&M
L, 30-27
-3
-12.5
NO

64.5
57



Oct 13, 2012
H
AUBRN
W, 41-20
21
4
YES
YES
49
61
O


Oct 27, 2012
@
ARK
W, 30-27
3
-6.5
NO

63
57
U


Nov 3, 2012
@
GEORGI
L, 37-10
-27
-13.5
NO

61.5
47



Nov 10, 2012
H
VANDY
L, 27-26
-1
2.5
YES

50.5
53



Nov 17, 2012
@
LSU
L, 41-35
-6
-18
NO

48.5
76



Nov 24, 2012
H
MIS.ST (http://MIS.ST)
W, 41-24
17
1
YES
YES
54
65
O


Jan 5, 2013
N
PITT
W, 38-17
21
4.5
YES
YES
54
55
O


Aug 29, 2013
@
VANDY
W, 39-35
4
3
YES
YES
52
74
O


Sep 7, 2013
H
SE.MIS
W, 31-13
18
49.5
YES
NO
61
44
U


Sep 14, 2013
@
TEXAS
W, 44-23
21
-1.5
NO

63.5
67
O


Sep 28, 2013
@
ALAB
L, 25-0
-25
-14
NO

54.5
25



Oct 5, 2013
@
AUBRN
L, 30-22
-8
2.5
YES

58
52



Oct 12, 2013
H
TEXA&M
L, 41-38
-3
-7
NO

77.5
79



Oct 19, 2013
H
LSU
W, 27-24
3
-9.5
NO

60
51
U


Oct 26, 2013
H
IDAHO
W, 59-14
45
41.5
YES
YES
58.5
73
O


Nov 9, 2013
H
ARK
W, 34-24
10
17
YES
NO
54.5
58
O


Nov 16, 2013
H
TROY
W, 51-21
30
28
YES
YES
69
72
O


Nov 23, 2013
H
MIZZOU
L, 24-10
-14
-1.5
NO

58.5
34



Nov 28, 2013
@
MIS.ST (http://MIS.ST)
L, 17-10
-7
3.5
YES

53.5
27



Dec 30, 2013
N
GATECH
W, 25-17
8
3
YES
YES
55
42
U


Aug 28, 2014
N
BOISE
W, 35-13
22
9.5
YES
YES
52
48
U


Sep 6, 2014
@
VANDY
W, 41-3
38
18
YES
YES
49.5
44
U


Sep 13, 2014
H
UL.LAF
W, 56-15
41
26
YES
YES
59
71
O


Sep 27, 2014
H
MEMPHS
W, 24-3
21
20
YES
YES
58.5
27
U


Oct 4, 2014
H
ALAB
W, 23-17
6
-4.5
NO

53
40
U


Oct 11, 2014
@
TEXA&M
W, 35-20
15
-2.5
NO

64
55
U


Oct 18, 2014
H
TENN
W, 34-3
31
15.5
YES
YES
45.5
37
U


Oct 25, 2014
@
LSU
L, 10-7
-3
3.5
YES

45
17



Nov 1, 2014
H
AUBRN
L, 35-31
-4
1
YES

54
66



Nov 8, 2014
H
PRESBYT
W, 48-0
48
52
YES
NO
--
48



Nov 22, 2014
@
ARK
L, 30-0
-30
3
YES

46
30



Nov 29, 2014
H
MIS.ST (http://MIS.ST)
W, 31-17
14
-2.5
NO

52.5
48
U


Dec 31, 2014
N
TCU
L, 42-3
-39
-3
NO

55
45



Sep 5, 2015
H
TN.MAR
W, 76-3
73
41
YES
YES
54
79
O


Sep 12, 2015
H
FRESNO
W, 73-21
52
33
YES
YES
55.5
94
O


Sep 19, 2015
@
ALAB
W, 43-37
6
-9
NO

52.5
80
O


Sep 26, 2015
H
VANDY
W, 27-16
11
27
YES
NO
53
43
U


Oct 3, 2015
@
FLA
L, 38-10
-28
7
YES

50.5
48



Oct 10, 2015
H
NMEXST
W, 52-3
49
46
YES
YES
69.5
55
U


Oct 17, 2015
@
MEMPHS
L, 37-24
-13
10
YES

72
61



Oct 24, 2015
H
TEXA&M
W, 23-3
20
6.5
YES
YES
66.5
26
U


Oct 31, 2015
@
AUBRN
W, 27-19
8
8
YES
YES
56
46
U


Nov 7, 2015
H
ARK
L, 53-52
-1
7.5
YES

54.5
105



Nov 21, 2015
H
LSU
W, 38-17
21
7
YES
YES
58
55
U


Nov 28, 2015
@
MIS.ST (http://MIS.ST)
W, 38-27
11
2
YES
YES
65.5
65
U


Jan 1, 2016
N
OKLAST
W, 48-20
28
7.5
YES
YES
70.5
68
U


Sep 5, 2016
@
FLAST
L, 45-34
-11
-4.5
NO

58
79



Sep 10, 2016
H
WOFFOR
W, 38-13
25
43
YES
NO
56.5
51
U


Sep 17, 2016
H
ALAB
L, 48-43
-5
-10
NO

53
91



Sep 24, 2016
H
GEORGI
W, 45-14
31
7
YES
YES
61.5
59
U


Oct 1, 2016
H
MEMPHS
W, 48-28
20
15.5
YES
YES
71.5
76
O


Oct 15, 2016
@
ARK
L, 34-30
-4
10
YES

65
64



Oct 22, 2016
@
LSU
L, 38-21
-17
-8.5
NO

60
59



Oct 29, 2016
H
AUBRN
L, 40-29
-11
-4.5
NO

64
69



Nov 5, 2016
H
GASOU
W, 37-27
10
28
YES
NO
63
64
O


Nov 12, 2016
@
TEXA&M
W, 29-28
1
-7
NO

62.5
57
U


Nov 19, 2016
@
VANDY
L, 38-17
-21
9.5
YES

50.5
55



Nov 26, 2016
H
MIS.ST (http://MIS.ST)
L, 55-20
-35
10
YES

69
75

[Quaoarsking]

The easiest way to shave points is to win a game you're favored in, just not by enough of a margin to beat the spread. I find that Ole Miss under Freeze won 31 games in which they were the favorite, and they covered the spread in 25 of these. Additionally, 4 of the 6 they didn't cover the spread were beatdowns on FCS teams, so I think it's safe to call them NOT GUILTY on any point shaving against the spread.

I doubt Ole Miss was losing games on purpose or manipulating scores in losses, but who knows.

It's also possible to manipulate over/unders, but that's less likely because it's hard to control what the other team does -- I guess you could let the other team score some garbage points on purpose, but it seems more likely that you'd just tank on offense in garbage time and make sure you stay under. (But at the same time it may be hard to ensure that the other team doesn't score enough to hit the over.) Again, I will assume that any score manipulation would come in Ole Miss wins. In the 39 games Hugh won at Ole Miss, 2 didn't have an O/U, and the Rebels hit the over in 14 games and they other 23 were under. That's a little bit of a lopsided ratio, but nothing damning in this small of a sample size.

What's interesting though, is that after beating Alabama in 2015, Hugh had 12 overs and 13 unders in his 25 wins. After that, it was only 2 more overs in wins and 10 unders1. That's a pretty unusual streak. Is it possible that there was some manipulation here? Did Hugh call off the dogs once the game was won in order not to hit the over? Again, it would be hard to do because who knows what the other team will do. And several of Ole Miss's losses in this time period hit the over, which is an argument against the shaving hypothesis. And it's probably more likely that Vegas had too much faith in Hugh's offense and was setting unrealistically high Overs.

Conclusion: They probably didn't shave points, unless it was just a one-time or occasional thing. But if they did shave points or manipulate scores for gambling purposes somehow, that long under streak in 2015-16 is probably where it was.



Note 1-Another interesting point is that both of those 2 overs just barely hit the over - they may have been under in a different sportsbook.

[AlmostPositive]

"One can only hope so, Jack"

[Dawg61]

I remember Bo Wallace having some really questionable interceptions his last two years

[Quaoarsking]

I remember Bo Wallace having some really questionable interceptions his last two years

Bo only failed to cover the spread as favorite once against an FBS team in his entire Ole Miss career, so if true, he must have been messing with the over/under or some other prop bets.

[Liverpooldawg]

Most of the rumors seem to center on Bo Wallace. In fairness to him, if he had been consistant, THAT would have been suspicious.

[Dawg61]

Bo only failed to cover the spread as favorite once against an FBS team in his entire Ole Miss career, so if true, he must have been messing with the over/under or some other prop bets.

Too difficult to figure out without knowing what they woulda been betting for/against and which games Vegas lost big on

[HSVDawg]

I remember Bo Wallace having some really questionable interceptions his last two years

All of his interceptions were shitty. He was really questionable at decision making and also had a noodle arm. That's not a good combination.

[Quaoarsking]

Bumping (sorry), since the rumors are coming out on Twitter again.

The allegation is Bo Wallace in 2014, and please note that Ole Miss Undered every game that year, except for UL-Lafayette (a blowout where Bo Wallace didn't play after the 1st drive of the second half) and Auburn (a game that came down to the final play)