Footnote 65

[confucius say]

Who is "Phyllis?"

Did they miss redacting a name. Booster 12, who gave money to Leo, is a woman bc she is referred to as "her." Appears to be Phyllis.

[mparkerfd20]

NM... Yeah I think so. Could be a former softball player for OM. Would be interesting huh?

[confucius say]

Appears to be connected to booster 14, who is an attorney in ridgeland and barneys personal attorney according to the Response.

[blacklistedbully]

Who is "Phyllis?"

Did they miss redacting a name. Booster 12, who gave money to Leo, is a woman bc she is referred to as "her." Appears to be Phyllis.

Where do you find mention of "Phyllis"?

[confucius say]

Where do you find mention of "Phyllis"?

In footnote 65. She is an employee of booster 14. Both 12 and 14 were disassociated.

[blacklistedbully]

In footnote 65. She is an employee of booster 14. Both 12 and 14 were disassociated.

I'm looking at that footnote now and don't see any mention of Phyllis, though I seem to recall seeing a document before that mentioned a name.

Can you double-check that info? That is a key element, if true, as it really narrows down significantly who Booster 14 could be. If the name "Phyllis" is not accurate, then it would make my post about "Booster 14" most likely specious, and I'd need to delete that post/thread.

[yjnkdawg]

If that was an actual person, then why wasn't that name redacted as all the others were?. An attorney slipup? Doubtful. Steve said on the Boneyard that was probably a code name and more than likely a Phyllis didn't actually exist.

[confucius say]

I'm looking at that footnote now and don't see any mention of Phyllis, though I seem to recall seeing a document before that mentioned a name.

Can you double-check that info? That is a key element, if true, as it really narrows down significantly who Booster 14 could be. If the name "Phyllis" is not accurate, then it would make my post about "Booster 14" most likely specious, and I'd need to delete that post/thread.

Hahahaha!! They took it out!! Line 5 of footnote 65 now says "[name 1]." Yesterday it said "Phyllis." Steve caught it too. Listen to the boneyard from today starting at 35:30 and he talks about how they paid all this money to lawyers to redact names and they left the name "Phyllis" in. That is freakin hilarious that they changed it once they realized it.

So no, don't you delete a thing.

[confucius say]

If that was an actual person, then why wasn't that name redacted as all the others were?. An attorney slipup? Doubtful. Steve said on the Boneyard that was probably a code name and more than likely a Phyllis didn't actually exist.

They have removed it now and replaced "Phyllis" with "[Name 1]." Hilarious.

[blacklistedbully]

Hahahaha!! They took it out!! Line 5 of footnote 65 now says "[name 1]." Yesterday it said "Phyllis." Steve caught it too. Listen to the boneyard from today starting at 35:30 and he talks about how they paid all this money to lawyers to redact names and they left the name "Phyllis" in. That is freakin hilarious that they changed it once they realized it.

So no, don't you delete a thing.

Well then, that leads one to believe the name, "Phyllis" is accurate. Why would they worry about correcting a false plant?

And if "Phyllis" is accurate, then I'm back to suspecting the lawyer I originally posted about.

[Mimi's Babies]

Hahahaha!! They took it out!! Line 5 of footnote 65 now says "[name 1]." Yesterday it said "Phyllis." Steve caught it too. Listen to the boneyard from today starting at 35:30 and he talks about how they paid all this money to lawyers to redact names and they left the name "Phyllis" in. That is freakin hilarious that they changed it once they realized it.

So no, don't you delete a thing.

That's too funny for all of those down loads and printed copies

[Mimi's Babies]

I'm looking at that footnote now and don't see any mention of Phyllis, though I seem to recall seeing a document before that mentioned a name.

Can you double-check that info? That is a key element, if true, as it really narrows down significantly who Booster 14 could be. If the name "Phyllis" is not accurate, then it would make my post about "Booster 14" most likely specious, and I'd need to delete that post/thread.

Did they take out LL tweeter name?

[confucius say]

That's too funny for all of those down loads and printed copies

Yep. I know somebody on here printed off.

[confucius say]

Well then, that leads one to believe the name, "Phyllis" is accurate. Why would they worry about correcting a false plant?

And if "Phyllis" is accurate, then I'm back to suspecting the lawyer I originally posted about.

No doubt they changed it for a reason.

[thedawginme]

Well then, that leads one to believe the name, "Phyllis" is accurate. Why would they worry about correcting a false plant?

And if "Phyllis" is accurate, then I'm back to suspecting the lawyer I originally posted about.

No wrong Firm. The named person no longer works there. Now at a Memphis firm.

[blacklistedbully]

No wrong Firm. The named person no longer works there. Now at a Memphis firm.

If so, it was fun speculating anyway. No harm done.

[metrodawg]

No wrong Firm. The named person no longer works there. Now at a Memphis firm.

Maybe a Memphis firm that does a lot of work for a taco?

[Jack Lambert]

Was it money or something equivalent to money.

[FISHDAWG]

If that was an actual person, then why wasn't that name redacted as all the others were?. An attorney slipup? Doubtful. Steve said on the Boneyard that was probably a code name and more than likely a Phyllis didn't actually exist.

sure she does - I've seen her on Fienbaum but she hates OM**

[dickiedawg]

The law firm bears the name of the booster. Anything else you hear is myth.