Chad Kelly

[msstate7]

Birdawg on SPS reporting Kelly out for year. Says press release coming soon.

I imagine that's gonna upset some of the trolls here

[klong-dog]

Be careful, you know some folks like to make up something, for the so called "rumor" to be spread and then to be taken off with. I know C34 has been got a time or two.

[msstate7]

Be careful, you know some folks like to make up something, for the so called "rumor" to be spread and then to be taken off with. I know C34 has been got a time or two.

Noxdog below says David Johnson reporting it too.

[Todd4State]

I'm not sure if it's 100% true or not but I knew that when they were asking Buchanan to return to the team that they weren't real confident.

[Jacksondevildog]

Being confirmed by Chuck and David Johnson. Out for year.

[LC Dawg]

The Kelly news comes after this article was written but I'm sure it's just more proof that God really does love Hugh Freeze.


http://https://omrebelnation.com/ole-miss-and-suffering-4b29628653c7?gi=fa7761cfd797#.guk9ka6fv (https://omrebelnation.com/ole-miss-and-suffering-4b29628653c7?gi=fa7761cfd797#.guk9ka6fv)

[msstatelp1]

Not sure who Michael Snowden is but he's saying it on twitter:


https://twitter.com/search?q=chad+kelly+injury&ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Ese arch

[Cloak]

Being confirmed by Chuck and David Johnson. Out for year.

Yup, here's the link to Chuck's Twitter post -

https://twitter.com/SpiritChuck/status/795414029917372416

[msstate7]

Not sure who Michael Snowden is but he's saying it on twitter:


https://twitter.com/search?q=chad+kelly+injury&ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Ese arch

Tweet below that says Youngblood out for year too

[bluelightstar]

For all the grief I've given Dan Mullen, Arkansas at home + Egg Bowl win to get to a bowl game and I will admit I've been wrong.

[I seen it dawg]

What's the injury? He get hit so hard his eyes go straight?

[Thick]

Worst case scenario now finish 5-7, but better kick OM's ass in Oxford. I mean absolutely burn VH to the ground!

[blacklistedbully]

Torn ACL & Lateral Meniscus. Has played his last for UNM.

[Todd4State]

Worst case scenario now finish 5-7, but better kick OM's ass in Oxford. I mean absolutely burn VH to the ground!

As much as I would love that I'll accept a win at this point even if it's one point.

[Sacrifice]

I hate it for Swag, but I'm really looking forward to the EB right about now

[Thick]

Yes, me too Todd.

[I seen it dawg]

I hate it for Swag, but I'm really looking forward to the EB right about now

The guy has been a piece of shit seemingly his whole life. Karma catching up. Hate it for one of the good guys that gets hurt. Swag? **** that guy.

[coastdoglover]

Karma is hell. My momma told me a long time ago that God dislikes hypocrites. Freeze personifies one

[blacklistedbully]

Pellerin has looked good. With Chad there was at least a good chance he'd gift us some t/o's via stupid decisions.

[Dolphus Raymond]

He should have left last year and entered the draft. Now he is just screwed.

[Dawg61]

I'm sure he'll get some pity STD's from Mia now

[Commercecomet24]

Karma is hell. My momma told me a long time ago that God dislikes hypocrites. Freeze personifies one

Karma is very real and she's unforgiving and vengeful!

[Dawg61]

Pellerin has looked good. With Chad there was at least a good chance he'd gift us some t/o's via stupid decisions.

https://cdn.meme.am/instances/55930413.jpg

[msstate7]

Pellerin has looked good. With Chad there was at least a good chance he'd gift us some t/o's via stupid decisions.

Pellerin game stats...

Vs wofford: 2/3 23 yds 1 td 1 int
Georgia: 2/5 11 yds 1 td 1 int
GA southern: 1/5 20 yds 0 td 1 int

4.1 yds/pass 3 int in 13 attempts

25 rushes 96 yds 3 td rushing

[HereComesTheSpiral]

I'm sure he'll get some pity STD's from Mia now

Nah, syphilis doesn't even want anything to do with that dilapidated mug

[Op4isabitch]

Another article from the douchebag and co,

https://olemiss.rivals.com/news/ole-miss-qb-chad-kelly-s-college-career-ends-with-knee-injury

[Todd4State]

Pellerin game stats...

Vs wofford: 2/3 23 yds 1 td 1 int
Georgia: 2/5 11 yds 1 td 1 int
GA southern: 1/5 20 yds 0 td 1 int

4.1 yds/pass 3 int in 13 attempts

25 rushes 96 yds 3 td rushing

That's pretty bad.

[Dawg-gone-dawgs]

Who is the guy with Gridiron Now on Twitter? He is saying expect to see Shea Patterson saturday..What a clueless bastard.

[Todd4State]

What's the injury? He get hit so hard his eyes go straight?

Sex injury. Pornhub date was with Ron Jeremy. Now having trouble walking.

[civildawg]

Nafoom is saying Patterson is expected to play

[msstate7]

Nafoom is saying Patterson is expected to play

Interesting

[msbulldog]

Interesting

Really interesting, if he doesn't play now that's a pretty good clue, about NCAA involvement.

[Dawg61]

Nafoom is saying Patterson is expected to play

Make your opponent prep for as many options as possible is one of the oldest tricks in the book. Smart though.

[Spiderman]

Nafoom is saying Patterson is expected to play

I expect him too now. Only way they can salvage season.

[msstate7]

Make your opponent prep for as many options as possible is one of the oldest tricks in the book. Smart though.

I think this is the plan too. I doubt Patterson plays

[Really Clark?]

So did Buchanan politely decline coming back because it conflicts with his upcoming mission work...his mission to keep his head attached to his body.

[lastmajordog]

If mullen can’t win EGG bowl now...even with patterson........it’s time to find out if this team is bullDOGS or not.......

[I seen it dawg]

**** those guys

[Todd4State]

Nafoom is saying Patterson is expected to play

I'm not buying it. But we'll see. I think this is being floated to ease the impact of the loss.

[mstatefan91]

I'm not buying it. But we'll see. I think this is being floated to ease the impact of the loss.

The season is a loss for them. That would be one of the worst moves they could make. Burn a redshirt on their potential star QB just so they can lose all 3 games anyway.

Sounds exactly like something Bucky would do, so yeah, Nafoom is probably right.

[blacklistedbully]

Pellerin game stats...

Vs wofford: 2/3 23 yds 1 td 1 int
Georgia: 2/5 11 yds 1 td 1 int
GA southern: 1/5 20 yds 0 td 1 int

4.1 yds/pass 3 int in 13 attempts

25 rushes 96 yds 3 td rushing

Guess I stand corrected. I'll admit I was basing it on the one time I saw him come in a game in relief. Thought he looked pretty good.

But also keep in mind...he'll be getting all the snaps in practice and will be going into each game knowing he's the starter.

[msstate7]

Guess I stand corrected. I'll admit I was basing it on the one time I saw him come in a game in relief. Thought he looked pretty good.

But also keep in mind...he'll be getting all the snaps in practice and will be going into each game knowing he's the starter.

His rushing stats are a little deceiving. He's come in short yardage situations

[Martianlander]

Remember the spin from unm: The next quarterback is always going to be the best one ever.

[Turfdawg67]

https://cdn.meme.am/instances/55930413.jpg

Took me a minute, but I get it now. Good stuff.

[GTHOM]

The guy has been a piece of shit seemingly his whole life. Karma catching up. Hate it for one of the good guys that gets hurt. Swag? **** that guy.

I dont like him either but I dont want him to tear a knee. Hugh deserves it though no doubt

[JohnnyQuid]

The guy has been a piece of shit seemingly his whole life. Karma catching up. Hate it for one of the good guys that gets hurt. Swag? **** that guy.

have to agree. I don't wish harm on the guy but it happened and from me not a single **** was given. the Webster injury vs fsu I felt bad because of how brutal it was visually. probably makes me a bad person,but **** Ole miss in general.

[Dawg61]

have to agree. I don't wish harm on the guy but it happened and from me not a single **** was given. the Webster injury vs fsu I felt bad because of how brutal it was visually. probably makes me a bad person,but **** Ole miss in general.

http://reactiongifs.me/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/jerry-seinfeld-kramer-pocker-face-Newman-winner-laugh.gif

[Drugs Delaney]

What happened to OM's season is that Freeze kept scrolling instead of typing "amen" and sharing. We've all been warned of such.

[blacklistedbully]

https://cdn.meme.am/instances/55930413.jpg

In his last 5 games Kelly has thrown 7 TDs vs 5 INT's. That's a shit ratio, jackass, and indicative of a guy who makes stupid decisions.

Though Pellerin has been worse, he's never got 1st team reps, etc.

[msstate7]

What happened to OM's season is that Freeze kept scrolling instead of typing "amen" and sharing. We've all been warned of such.

Like

[blacklistedbully]

Pellerin game stats...

Vs wofford: 2/3 23 yds 1 td 1 int
Georgia: 2/5 11 yds 1 td 1 int
GA southern: 1/5 20 yds 0 td 1 int

4.1 yds/pass 3 int in 13 attempts

25 rushes 96 yds 3 td rushing

Just looked up the stats myself.

Pellerin has played in 5 games. In 3 of those 5, his adjusted QBR was higher than some of Kelly's games. In fact, one of his games was better than 7 of Kelly's 9 games. Another was better than 4 of Kelly's games, and a 3rd was better than 1 of Kelly's.

I think we'd better wait and see how well he can do if he gets all the snaps in practice and goes into each game knowing he's the starter.

You also have to consider Pellerin wasn't playing with the starters in mop-up duty, as was Kelly.

[Really Clark?]

Just looked up the stats myself.

Pellerin has played in 5 games. In 3 of those 5, his adjusted QBR was higher than some of Kelly's games. In fact, one of his games was better than 7 of Kelly's 9 games. Another was better than 4 of Kelly's games, and a 3rd was better than 1 of Kelly's.

I think we'd better wait and see how well he can do if he gets all the snaps in practice and goes into each game knowing he's the starter.

You also have to consider Pellerin wasn't playing with the starters in mop-up duty, as was Kelly.

You can't use the QBR with that low of stats. The formula doesn't work correctly. That's why in the actual ranking of QB's you have to have so much passing or playing time. Fitzgerald, Stanley and Ross all had much higher ratings than Dak last year.

[blacklistedbully]

You can't use the QBR with that low of stats. The formula doesn't work correctly. That's why in the actual ranking of QB's you have to have so much passing or playing time. Fitzgerald, Stanley and Ross all had much higher ratings than Dak last year.

Then the same goes for using his stats to claim he sucks.

[Really Clark?]

Then the same goes for using his stats to claim he sucks.

The 3 INT in 13 attempts is a tangible issue considering he has thrown one INT in every game he attempted a pass in. But bigger than that was he played nearly the entire second half against Ga So. They only got 2 fields goals and he was 1-5 trying to finish out a game with a lessor opponent with a lead. When GA So got back to 34-27 his next possession he throws a pick. The defense was able hold and their last FG to ice the game it was nothing but Judd. He had one pass, incompletion. He is a running threat but I definitely try to prove he can beat me throwing and contain his running. There is also a reason Freeze brought up Buchanan in the press conference and smoke of Patterson's shirt coming off. (I believe it when he takes his first snap)

[blacklistedbully]

The 3 INT in 13 attempts is a tangible issue considering he has thrown one INT in every game he attempted a pass in. But bigger than that was he played nearly the entire second half against Ga So. They only got 2 fields goals and he was 1-5 trying to finish out a game with a lessor opponent with a lead. When GA So got back to 34-27 his next possession he throws a pick. The defense was able hold and their last FG to ice the game it was nothing but Judd. He had one pass, incompletion. He is a running threat but I definitely try to prove he can beat me throwing and contain his running. There is also a reason Freeze brought up Buchanan in the press conference and smoke of Patterson's shirt coming off. (I believe it when he takes his first snap)

Again...let's see what he can do when he gets all the first team reps, etc. You can't legitimately write off AQBR. then cherry-pick stats ti support your POV.

CK should have had more picks as well, but he had WR's bail him out quite a few times.

[Really Clark?]

Again...let's see what he can do when he gets all the first team reps, etc. You can't legitimately write off AQBR. then cherry-pick stats ti support your POV.

CK should have had more picks as well, but he had WR's bail him out quite a few times.

I didn't cherry pick anything. You used an incredibly skewed stat that requires more numbers to even be accurate. The 3 INT in 13 attempts is a concern when 2 of those were in mop up duty. You are calling safe plays that you believe he should handle and it is an issue. But like I said the really only legit game you can scrutinize is his second half against Ga So. First team reps should help but all we have to go by is the film we have right now. That is not good throwing the ball and first team reps is not going to magically fix accuracy problems but allows the coaches to get a better feel of what he can handle to give him confidence. He can run though.

[Political Hack]

Nafoom is saying Patterson is expected to play

It's a multi-million dollar decision. If Shea plays and they make a bowl, they get an extra million or so. They'll snatch his RS off for that.

[blacklistedbully]

I didn't cherry pick anything. 3 INT in 13 attempts is a concern when 2 of those were in mop up duty. You are calling safe plays that you believe he should handle and it is an issue. But like I said the really only legit game you can scrutinize is his second half against Ga So. First team reps should help but all we have to go by is the film we have right now. That is not good throwing the ball and first team reps is not going to magically fix accuracy problems but allows the coaches to get a better feel of what he can handle to give him confidence. He can run though.

BS. First team reps can make a HUGE difference. QB's and their targets need to get timing down, as well as develop a feel for where they are going on routes/break downs, etc. Confidence also makes a big diff, including the kind of confidence an athlete gets from proper game prep.

Dak talks about it all the time when asked why he plays with such poise and confidence. Says it comes from the fact he spends so much time preparing.

Oh, and that lessor opponent was giving UNM hell all game.

I hope like hell Pellerin proves to be as bad as his limited stats...but anyone counting on that is getting ahead of themselves. We simply do not know what he will be like when he is "the man" full time, getting all the 1st team reps and playing with the first team unit.

[Really Clark?]

BS. First team reps can make a HUGE difference. QB's and their targets need to get timing down, as well as develop a feel for where they are going on routes/break downs, etc. Confidence also makes a big diff, including the kind of confidence an athlete gets from proper game prep.

Dak talks about it all the time when asked why he plays with such poise and confidence. Says it comes from the fact he spends so much time preparing.

Oh, and that lessor opponent was giving UNM hell all game.

I hope like hell Pellerin proves to be as bad as his limited stats...but anyone counting on that is getting ahead of themselves. We simply do not know what he will be like when he is "the man" full time, getting all the 1st team reps and playing with the first team unit.

I said first team reps can help. Can you read or just want to be pissy about someone disagreeing with you again. And using an incredibly inaccurate formulated stat to try and prove yourself right. First team reps will help his learning a lot, but those are not going fix accuracy issues and he has that problem with his fundamentals. Again it's why it can help him and the coaches figure what he throws the best to give him confidence. But it will show back up when he gets under pressure which he won't be feeling that heat until he gets a full game. Until he proves he can make the right throw and accurately, which the film right now does not look favorable, then he will see a heavy dose of pressure containment.

[confucius say]

BS. First team reps can make a HUGE difference. QB's and their targets need to get timing down, as well as develop a feel for where they are going on routes/break downs, etc. Confidence also makes a big diff, including the kind of confidence an athlete gets from proper game prep.

Dak talks about it all the time when asked why he plays with such poise and confidence. Says it comes from the fact he spends so much time preparing.

Oh, and that lessor opponent was giving UNM hell all game.

I hope like hell Pellerin proves to be as bad as his limited stats...but anyone counting on that is getting ahead of themselves. We simply do not know what he will be like when he is "the man" full time, getting all the 1st team reps and playing with the first team unit.

Is your larger point that om might be a better team without Kelly playing? Say that out loud.

[blacklistedbully]

I said first team reps can help. Can you read or just want to be pissy about someone disagreeing with you again. And using an incredibly inaccurate formulated stat to try and prove yourself right. First team reps will help his learning a lot, but those are not going fix accuracy issues and he has that problem with his fundamentals. Again it's why it can help him and the coaches figure what he throws the best to give him confidence. But it will show back up when he gets under pressure which he won't be feeling that heat until he gets a full game. Until he proves he can make the right throw and accurately, which the film right now does not look favorable, then he will see a heavy dose of pressure containment.

Ah...so you can get "pissy" with me for disagreeing with you, but it doesn't work the other way around? Right...got it***

Look, jackass...I'm saying first team reps can make HUGE difference, particularly when juxtaposed with the small sample size of his limited play you so keenly want to use in support of your argument.

All you did was acknowledge they should help, but in a context that suggests you were downplaying the possible impact. Your insistence on judging him based on his play in his last game, where he came in unexpectedly and without the benefit of a full week's prep as a starter...much less how he'll be after 3 weeks of such prep is just stupid.

[blacklistedbully]

Is your larger point that om might be a better team without Kelly playing? Say that out loud.

Nope. My larger point is that we should not assume they will be much worse. Kelly is a very talented athlete...but one that has made numerous poor decisions that have resulted in t/o's. T/o's are often game deciders. With Kelly, you know if you pressure him and contain him, odds are he's gonna put it up for grabs.

My larger point is we should see how the kid performs over the next 2 weeks before we start proclaiming this is a game we should win in Oxford.

[Really Clark?]

Is your larger point that om might be a better team without Kelly playing? Say that out loud.

He is just trying to defend his position that got called out last night. Thought he finally had a stat to back it up and you just can't use QBR with such a limited number of snaps. Here is what all those first team reps will do for him this week. I suspect he throws 6,000 screen passes and they tried to find the coverages he can actually read for anything down the field probably targeting Engram in the middle zone. Run a lot of speed sweeps and misdirections and hope he doesn't have to throw it more than 25 times and take a few shots down the field when the opportunity shows. If he can handle throwing 15+ balls beyond 20 yards and deliver them accurately, I will be surprised.

[lastmajordog]

delete

[blacklistedbully]

He is just trying to defend his position that got called out last night. Thought he finally had a stat to back it up and you just can't use QBR with such a limited number of snaps. Here is what all those first team reps will do for him this week. I suspect he throws 6,000 screen passes and they tried to find the coverages he can actually read for anything down the field probably targeting Engram in the middle zone. Run a lot of speed sweeps and misdirections and hope he doesn't have to throw it more than 25 times and take a few shots down the field when the opportunity shows. If he can handle throwing 15+ balls beyond 20 yards and deliver them accurately, I will be surprised.

Yet you want to use the very stats that make up the AQBR to defend your position.

Hypocrite.

[Really Clark?]

Ah...so you can get "pissy" with me for disagreeing with you, but it doesn't work the other way around? Right...got it***

Look, jackass...I'm saying first team reps can make HUGE difference, particularly when juxtaposed with the small sample size of his limited play you so keenly want to use in support of your argument.

All you did was acknowledge they should help, but in a context that suggests you were downplaying the possible impact. Your insistence on judging him based on his play in his last game, where he came in unexpectedly and without the benefit of a full week's prep as a starter...much less how he'll be after 3 weeks of such prep is just stupid.

I didn't. I said I didn't cherry pick anything and pointed how you was trying justify your opinion by using a false stat. You kept escalating the debate. Just like you always do. And I didn't name call but said you were being pissy. Big difference but that again is what you do. Deflect, name call, change the debate, etc. There is nothing on film or in the stats that justifies youvtance that he is a good QB. That was your stance you back tracked and said you stood corrected then jumped the gun looking for anyway to justify your original stance that he is a good QB hours later. And it was a bad inaccurate state and I pointed that out. You could have left it but like you do got defensive and tried to poke holes in my opinion and come off pissy doing so.

[Really Clark?]

Yet you want to use the very stats that make up the AQBR to defend your position.

Hypocrite.

I just mentione his INT's as an issue. MSState 7 is the one posted all the stats. And this is not me just saying it, NOBODY uses the QBR in rating QB's until they have reached a certain number of throws. The formula doesn't work with limited samples. It can also skew to the negative and be a false number. Your position is not defendable. Quit trying to justify, deflect and name all. Take that crap back to your debates with the douches or just don't engage me anymore if you can't be civil. And if you get pissy be prepared to be called out on it. You go too far a lot with your attitude

[blacklistedbully]

I didn't. I said I didn't cherry pick anything and pointed how you was trying justify your opinion by using a false stat. You kept escalating the debate. Just like you always do. And I didn't name call but said you were being pissy. Big difference but that again is what you do. Deflect, name call, change the debate, etc. There is nothing on film or in the stats that justifies youvtance that he is a good QB. That was your stance you back tracked and said you stood corrected then jumped the gun looking for anyway to justify your original stance that he is a good QB hours later. And it was a bad inaccurate state and I pointed that out. You could have left it but like you do got defensive and tried to poke holes in my opinion and come off pissy doing so.

Jesus, you have no clue how much you are the pot calling the kettle black!

My original acknowledgement of being "corrected" is proof I don't have a problem admitting I could be wrong. Because of that correction I decided I should educate myself s oas to arrive at a more informed opinion.

Since the "correction" was based on his season stats, I used those same stats...but in a more in-depth consideration to revise my opinion. But again....I have not been sparring with you to say Pellerin is a "good QB". I have sated it is STUPID to assume he will not be a good QB...or that we should expect to win the Egg now that MGK is out.

As far as name-calling goes...it's an appropriate response here when someone insults you. You went with,"pissy"...I responded by calling you a jackass. Boo-****ing-hoo! No need to cry about it. Your response was condescending, thus deserved the "jackass" you got.

Oh, and you absolutley, positively have the exact same MO you accuse me of. I've seen you time and again get snotty with people who don;t share your opinion. The Dan Mullen debates come especially to mind.

Self realization is not a strong suit for you, is it?

[msstate7]

Pellerin passing rating is 77.33.

http://www.cfbstats.com/2016/player/433/1071632/index.html

Not that it matters with only 13 passes, but wondering how he could get any qb rating better than Kelly with a passing rating that low. Kelly is 147.38 in passing rating. Kelly avgs more per rush too

[Really Clark?]

Jesus, you have no clue how much you are the pot calling the kettle black!

My original acknowledgement of being "corrected" is proof I don't have a problem admitting I could be wrong. Because of that correction I decided I should educate myself s oas to arrive at a more informed opinion.

Since the "correction" was based on his season stats, I used those same stats...but in a more in-depth consideration to revise my opinion. But again....I have not been sparring with you to say Pellerin is a "good QB". I have sated it is STUPID to assume he will not be a good QB...or that we should expect to win the Egg now that MGK is out.

As far as name-calling goes...it's an appropriate response here when someone insults you. You went with,"pissy"...I responded by calling you a jackass. Boo-****ing-hoo! No need to cry about it. Your response was condescending, thus deserved the "jackass" you got.

Oh, and you absolutley, positively have the exact same MO you accuse me of. I've seen you time and again get snotty with people who don;t share your opinion. The Dan Mullen debates come especially to mind.

Self realization is not a strong suit for you, is it?

I didn't call you pissy. I said "want to be pissy about someone disagreeing with you". That is not name calling. I was very very straight forward and cordial in my disagreement. You called it BS. I responded in kind. Don't like don't call something BS when my major point was you using QBR is inaccurate until he has a much bigger sample size. Staley had better QBR than Dak last year because of a small sample size. Can you justify Staley, who is no longer on the team and a back up in JUCO, just needing first team reps? Same thing.

I do get snotty. When in response to that. And have admitted that on more than one occasion and have apologized for it more than once and I'm sure some the ones that I have done so with can tell you that.

[blacklistedbully]

Pellerin passing rating is 77.33.

http://www.cfbstats.com/2016/player/433/1071632/index.html

Not that it matters with only 13 passes, but wondering how he could get any qb rating better than Kelly with a passing rating that low. Kelly is 147.38 in passing rating. Kelly avgs more per rush too

Because with so few overall attempts, decent ratings in 2 games, plus a so-so rating in a 3rd can be dragged down by 2 games with piss poor ratings. In particular his 0-5 passing in the last game really hurt his overall rating. That represented 38% of his pass attempts for the season.

[blacklistedbully]

But bigger than that was he played nearly the entire second half against Ga So. They only got 2 fields goals and he was 1-5 trying to finish out a game with a lessor opponent with a lead.

Actually, he got a little less than 1 & 2/3 quarters. And though I did not watch the game, an OM fan posted he should have been 3 of 5 with a TD. Apparently he had some dropped passes.

Of course, whatever an OM fan says must be taken with a grain-of-salt.

[Dawg61]

Jesus, you have no clue how much you are the pot calling the kettle black!

My original acknowledgement of being "corrected" is proof I don't have a problem admitting I could be wrong. Because of that correction I decided I should educate myself s oas to arrive at a more informed opinion.

Since the "correction" was based on his season stats, I used those same stats...but in a more in-depth consideration to revise my opinion. But again....I have not been sparring with you to say Pellerin is a "good QB". I have sated it is STUPID to assume he will not be a good QB...or that we should expect to win the Egg now that MGK is out.

As far as name-calling goes...it's an appropriate response here when someone insults you. You went with,"pissy"...I responded by calling you a jackass. Boo-****ing-hoo! No need to cry about it. Your response was condescending, thus deserved the "jackass" you got.

Oh, and you absolutley, positively have the exact same MO you accuse me of. I've seen you time and again get snotty with people who don;t share your opinion. The Dan Mullen debates come especially to mind.

Self realization is not a strong suit for you, is it?


I didn't call you pissy. I said "want to be pissy about someone disagreeing with you". That is not name calling. I was very very straight forward and cordial in my disagreement. You called it BS. I responded in kind. Don't like don't call something BS when my major point was you using QBR is inaccurate until he has a much bigger sample size. Staley had better QBR than Dak last year because of a small sample size. Can you justify Staley, who is no longer on the team and a back up in JUCO, just needing first team reps? Same thing.

I do get snotty. When in response to that. And have admitted that on more than one occasion and have apologized for it more than once and I'm sure some the ones that I have done so with can tell you that.

http://fiercemarriage.com/files/not-listening-dumb-and-dumber-o.gif

[blacklistedbully]

Actually, he got a little less than 1 & 2/3 quarters. And though I did not watch the game, an OM fan posted he should have been 3 of 5 with a TD. Apparently he had some dropped passes.

Of course, whatever an OM fan says must be taken with a grain-of-salt.

ETA - apparently the INT was a good pass to AJ, but AJ allowed the defender to take the ball from him.

[Really Clark?]

Actually, he got a little less than 1 & 2/3 quarters. And though I did not watch the game, an OM fan posted he should have been 3 of 5 with a TD. Apparently he had some dropped passes.

Of course, whatever an OM fan says must be taken with a grain-of-salt.

I didn't check the amount of game time he played in the second half just knew it was nearly their entire half. He came in on their first series of the second half when the injury occurred. They had ran 6 plays at that time. He ran 29 of their 35 plays in the second half or 83%. They ran it 24 times and threw it 5 and I think he missed his first pass and hit his second for 19 yards to Van Jefferson. Be interesting to see the game plan for him next week, if he is the guy.

[Really Clark?]

http://fiercemarriage.com/files/not-listening-dumb-and-dumber-o.gif

Hilarious. +1!!

[DownwardDawg]

Is your larger point that om might be a better team without Kelly playing? Say that out loud.

Seriously!!!! WTH is his argument??
So Fitz looked unreal last year in limited play. I guess we should have benched Dak and gave 1st team reps to Fitz. Then we would have been better!!!

There's a reason pellerin is not the starter.

[starkvegasdawg]

Who knew a thread about our rival QB being out for the season would have turned into this:

http://i.imgur.com/Fhm342g.gif

[blacklistedbully]

Seriously!!!! WTH is his argument??
So Fitz looked unreal last year in limited play. I guess we should have benched Dak and gave 1st team reps to Fitz. Then we would have been better!!!

There's a reason pellerin is not the starter.

Perhaps you should read my reply before you assume I said what he is insinuating I said. Then you wouldn't look so foolish for criticizing a position I didn't actually take.

I simply said and continue to say it's premature to assume Pellerin will not be good if he starts getting all the first-team reps in practice and goes into the game knowing he's the man. I said it's foolish to assume we are likely to win in Oxford simply because MGK is out. Pellerin has looked good at times. Ole Miss fans are saying his 1 for 5 passing and INT was on the receivers...that he should have been 3 for 5 with a passing TD and no INT.

[fishwater99]

.@CoachHughFreeze regarding pulling Patterson's redshirt, "I would rule nothing out today, but it would be a difficult thing to do."

[blacklistedbully]

No way he's staying every year anyway. Pull the redshirt. Plus, Freeze is going to be there even less than Patterson, so Freeze should be motivated to pull it for that reason, if for no other.

Only reason I can see for not doing it is if they know doing so will cause even more problems with the NCAA.

[msbulldog]

http://fiercemarriage.com/files/not-listening-dumb-and-dumber-o.gif

Like^^^^^ Damn 2 page argument.

[msbulldog]

Who knew a thread about our rival QB being out for the season would have turned into this:

http://i.imgur.com/Fhm342g.gif

Really? Too funny^^^^^^^^

[blacklistedbully]

Like^^^^^ Damn 2 page argument.

There are other threads. Please feel free to ignore this one and participate in the others.

[shannondawg]

One thing that hasn't been brought up,what kinda pressure Freeze is under to play or not play Patterson?

[MedDawg]

Pellerin passing rating is 77.33.

http://www.cfbstats.com/2016/player/433/1071632/index.html

Not that it matters with only 13 passes, but wondering how he could get any qb rating better than Kelly with a passing rating that low. Kelly is 147.38 in passing rating. Kelly avgs more per rush too

I don't think there is any way Pellerin will be as good as Kelly. However, if Pellerin figures out that he only needs to toss it up and his receivers will take it away from the DB's, then he could still be dangerous.