PDA

View Full Version : G. Brooks



Dawg-gone-dawgs
10-10-2016, 09:20 AM
I know he didnt visit and may visit during Maroon Madness but I noticed the CB's on 247 have moved to 71% in favor of us. What has changed with him? I thought for sure he would be headed to NC.

msstate7
10-10-2016, 09:27 AM
Not gonna get my hopes up too much, but I like seeing the CBs our way. If we sign nick and brooks, we'll have beat out North Carolina for 2 recruits... impressive.

Wonder if the CBs our way have anything to do with UNC's NCAA deal the other day. Did they get bad news?

BeardoMSU
10-10-2016, 09:29 AM
Not gonna get my hopes up too much, but I like seeing the CBs our way. If we sign nick and brooks, we'll have beat out North Carolina for 2 recruits... impressive.

Wonder if the CBs our way have anything to do with UNC's NCAA deal the other day. Did they get bad news?

damn....thank God for basketball season.

Homedawg
10-10-2016, 09:30 AM
Unc cancelled his visit. Doesn't appear they are players any longer.

msstate7
10-10-2016, 09:31 AM
Unc cancelled his visit. Doesn't appear they are players any longer.

They just cancelled bc they knew they didn't have a chance recruiting against us haha

Homedawg
10-10-2016, 09:36 AM
They just cancelled bc they knew they didn't have a chance recruiting against us haha
Maybe. But everything I hear we are fighting an uphill battle too. Guess momma dealing w all that.

Dawg-gone-dawgs
10-10-2016, 09:44 AM
They just need Howland to have a long talk with her and she'll come around.

Political Hack
10-10-2016, 09:47 AM
I thought this thread was about friends in low places.

MarketingBully
10-10-2016, 10:16 AM
If we can get Brooks and Kiir to go along with who we already have in Weatherspoon, Howland will have as much talent as he ever had at UCLA on this team. I feel pretty good about Brooks. I think it basically will come down to us and Georgia now that UNC is out of the picture. I see NIT with an outside shot at the big dance this year with a Sweet 16 + run next year. The sky is the limit with this team and the future is bright fellas. :)

msbulldog
10-10-2016, 10:19 AM
If we can get Brooks and Kiir to go along with who we already have in Weatherspoon, Howland will have as much talent as he ever had at UCLA on this team. I feel pretty good about Brooks. I think it basically will come down to us and Georgia now that UNC is out of the picture. I see NIT with an outside shot at the big dance this year with a Sweet 16 + run next year. The sky is the limit with this team and the future is bright fellas. :)

Good news after Saturday.

Dawg-gone-dawgs
10-10-2016, 10:24 AM
can we take 3? I was thinking it would be either or with Kiir and Brooks but if we can take 3 that would give us some serious depth in the front court next year.

Ifyouonlyknew
10-10-2016, 10:59 AM
He wants to be at MSU. Hopefully the family can come to a resolution so he gets to do what he wants.

Dawg-gone-dawgs
10-10-2016, 11:25 AM
were lucky to have you sir! Thanks for your info!

klong-dog
10-10-2016, 12:21 PM
I heard our biggest competition for Brooks is Georgia.

Ifyouonlyknew
10-10-2016, 12:40 PM
I heard our biggest competition for Brooks is Georgia.

UGA is the only OV he's been on so far.

BankerDog
10-10-2016, 01:06 PM
Only signing 2 this year.

msstate7
10-10-2016, 01:09 PM
Only signing 2 this year.

So I suppose this means strugg is better than first thought?

Ifyouonlyknew
10-10-2016, 01:11 PM
Only signing 2 this year.

If a legit 3rd guy wants to come we'll make room but we won't push for a 3rd player. If Kiir & Garrison both called today we'd take both.

Bass Chaser
10-10-2016, 01:14 PM
So I suppose this means strugg is better than first thought?

Strugg's issue is he'll never be 100% healthy. I believe he had stress fractures in both shins when he arrived.

smootness
10-10-2016, 01:17 PM
If a legit 3rd guy wants to come we'll make room but we won't push for a 3rd player. If Kiir & Garrison both called today we'd take both.

So, would it be fair to say that as of now, it is:
1. Weatherspoon
2. Kiir
2. Brooks
4. Someone else

...where we would be happy with just 1 and one of the next 2, we would take all of the top 3 if possible, and we would only move onto 4 if we didn't end up with at least 2 of the top 3?