My first complaint of the Mullen era

[Coach007]

The qb decision today.


Pick a guy.... Fitz in my opinion. Let the man play.

[DogsofAnarchy]

Fitz was straight garbage while he was in there!!

[Coach007]

Not the point! Fitz is proven, can throw it, le him settle down and play through.

[sandjunky]

Fitz was straight garbage while he was in there!!

You're a dubmass. Two dropped passes and Fitz is garbage?

[Coach007]

Exactly! This is on Mullen! Period!

[TopDawg]

Williams started out great, but worse as the game progressed. I agree we need to go with Fitz.

[parabrave]

The heck with both of them. The team doesn't like Fitz and won't put out for him and well DW is just a backup. Time to give Tiano more reps at practice and get him ready to play.

[Coach007]

What the crap! The team don't like.... get outta here with that crap.


Mullen made that call! It's on him. This should not have even been a game!

[JohnnyQuid]

fitz 0-3 with 2 drops. Williams had success with shit underneath early. they took that away - he looked like shit. and we left him in there. 1.5 quarters we did absolutely nothing.

we deserve to lose. that was dumb

[OlePissSux]

Nice knowing ya Dan. He doesn't deserve to coach another game.

[RougeDawg]

The play calling was much better when Williams came in. Fitz had some bad plays given two him and then some bad drops. No way he shouldn't have been given another chance after we went stagnant on offense.

[Statecoachingblows**]

You need to give each guy the same opportunity. D Will got better play calls and pass pro to start. Maybe there is something to the talk about fitz not having the same report with the guys, I don't know but he did have less time than d will. Doesn't matter because we can't cover a wet 17n sock if we could put up 45 a game our opponent would hit 46. We are out coached at every position against USA for gods sake. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA

[I seen it dawg]

8 years in and we have none of the following...

QB
RB
OL
CB

Let that sink in...

[Bass Chaser]

8 years in and we have none of the following...

QB
RB
OL
CB

Let that sink in...

This what I can't wrap my mind around. Next year doesn't look any better.

[I seen it dawg]

This what I can't wrap my mind around. Next year doesn't look any better.

Only difference is we will be 9 years in

[dawgs]

8 years in and we have none of the following...

QB
RB
OL
CB

Let that sink in...

it's almost like not signing higher rated recruits hurts

[War Machine Dawg]

8 years in and we have none of the following...

QB
RB
OL
CB

Let that sink in...

I'm not convinced we don't have RBs. Mullen just insists on playing the wrong 2. And I'm not saying we should bench Holloway. He's proven he deserves to play and get touches. But he should be the change of pace to someone else.

[Statecoachingblows**]

So the consensus is coaching? Interesting ...

[Bass Chaser]

I'm not convinced we don't have RBs. Mullen just insists on playing the wrong 2. And I'm not saying we should bench Holloway. He's proven he deserves to play and get touches. But he should be the change of pace to someone else.

I thought the 2-back sets were working then we went away from them

[Coach007]

So the consensus is coaching? Interesting ...

Yes. In this game, yes. You can't pull your starter with only 3 passes attempted! I mean seriously.... that's horrible

[War Machine Dawg]

I thought the 2-back sets were working then we went away from them

I've been campaigning for the return of the 2-back sets for 2 years. Shump as a FB would be hell.

[I seen it dawg]

I'm not convinced we don't have RBs. Mullen just insists on playing the wrong 2. And I'm not saying we should bench Holloway. He's proven he deserves to play and get touches. But he should be the change of pace to someone else.

Well if they are on the roster they are not playing. Which means we don't have any.