Key phrase in Steve's statement

[Maroons]

THERE IS MORE TO COME.

Bears should be VERY worried.

[TrapGame]

I'm waiting on the Scarborough and Tunsil shoes to drop. And drop as in we dropped something on Hiroshima.

[Commercecomet24]

Yeah i think IT is finally almost here.

[AlmostPositive]

If you are a State fan and you believe a syllable on this topic from Ole Miss supporters, you need to rethink everything about your life.

Ninety-nine percent are parroting hearsay. The rest are actively lying.

[Coach34]

OM fans now threatening his job- so now you know he is doing something right

[jumbo]

If you are State fan and you believe a syllable on this topic from Ole Miss supporters, you need to rethink everything about your life.

Ninety-nine percent are parroting hearsay. The rest are actively lying.



Other's have pointed this out, but it's comical how quickly they went from not knowing about any investigation or NOA coming to all the sudden they are experts about every detail once it was released.

[deltadawg99]

I've got to tip my hat to Steve. He's got some balls.

[Dawgtini]

OM fans now threatening his job- so now you know he is doing something right

Sadly, this IS the best indicator.

[Coach007]

OM fans now threatening his job- so now you know he is doing something right

Also stating that they are not subject to FOIA

[cheewgumm]

To me, the biggest spotlight he's shining is on the Clarion Ledger...just willfully ignorant and not interested at all in the what's happening.

I don't know how someone like Kellenberger can look himself in the mirror at night. (Beyond the obvious reasons that would be awful)

[RougeDawg]

I just wish We had a more precise window for the implosion so I could go ahead and put my bottles of champagne on ice.

[NYDawg]

Is it true that they recently switched outside counsel for this matter?

[Dawg-gone-dawgs]

hope you got a Yeti**

[Bully13]

Also stating that they are not subject to FOIA

On what grounds do they say they are not subject to the foia?

[Coach007]

Is it true that they recently switched outside counsel for this matter?

They had both since the beginning. Even during the ULL meeting/interviews.

[Brahmabull]

He will not get the letter from his request. They will simply say it is with their outside counsel. That said, I believe there is much more to come.

[NYDawg]

They had both since the beginning. Even during the ULL meeting/interviews.

Thanks.

[AlmostPositive]

What happened to the CL own's law suit against Ole Miss?... two lawyers were going at each over that a week ago here. One who sounded like he know what he was talking about said you can't park FOIA-targeted documents at outside counsel. If you could, everyone would do it, so I suspect he is right.

[NYDawg]

What happened to the CL own's law suit against Ole Miss?... two lawyers were going at each over that a week ago here. One who sounded like he know what he was talking about said you can't park FOIA-targeted documents at outside counsel. If you could, everyone would do it, so I suspect he is right.

My recollection is that we agreed that the outside counsel argument is a loser, disagreed whether it is even a colorable position (I say no), and, assuming that OM intends to take this position, agreed it would most likely be a way to buy time and control the message rather than an argument they'd want to litigate. I don't think we were as far apart as it appeared from the thread.

[gtowndawg]

My recollection is that we agreed that the outside counsel argument is a loser, disagreed whether it is even a colorable position (I say no), and, assuming that OM intends to take this position, agreed it would most likely be a way to buy time and control the message rather than an argument they'd want to litigate. I don't think we were as far apart as it appeared from the thread.

File a motion to compel. I'm not sure what it does but I've always liked the way it sounds.

[chainedup_Dawg]

My recollection is that we agreed that the outside counsel argument is a loser, disagreed whether it is even a colorable position (I say no), and, assuming that OM intends to take this position, agreed it would most likely be a way to buy time and control the message rather than an argument they'd want to litigate. I don't think we were as far apart as it appeared from the thread.

NyDawg, if I'm not mistaken, wouldn't the FOIA bind whomever the NOA was addressed to? If so, it doesn't matter who currently has the letter as the letter would address the offender, no?

[RIdog]

I'm waiting on the Scarborough and Tunsil shoes to drop. And drop as in we dropped something on Hiroshima.

Excuse my ignorance , but who's Scarborough ?

[Schultzy]

Love lawyer arguments. NYDawg is Cruise other lawyer Demi

http://youtu.be/4jevG0vhGWU

[Bass Chaser]

Excuse my ignorance , but who's Scarborough ?

RB at Bama paid to visit OM

[NYDawg]

NyDawg, if I'm not mistaken, wouldn't the FOIA bind whomever the NOA was addressed to? If so, it doesn't matter who currently has the letter as the letter would address the offender, no?


It shouldn't matter given the language of the statute.

[spbdawg]

#

[Schultzy]

Not a lawyer but I was the other guy....I'm extremely aware of the ms Public Records Act of 1983. Public agencies in ms have a duty to maintain all records and said records or a representation of records can never be lawfully dispossessed....period.

If what you say is true then FOIA is never applicable.

[spbdawg]

#