Big4Dawg
02-02-2016, 11:23 AM
I've seen a lot of rumors about a "2nd letter" coming from NCAA. Could the reason for the 2nd letter instead of one large letter be this?
http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/college/2012/10/30/ncaa-enforcement-infractions-new-structure-penalties-mark-emmert/1668621/
The NCAA approved a new enforcement structure Tuesday that will dramatically change the way it punishes rules-breakers in college athletics.
The changes ? which take effect Aug. 1, 2013 ? mean coaches will be held more accountable for infractions that happen under their watch and could be penalized in a way that follows them if they change jobs....
....The NCAA said conduct breaches that occurred before Oct. 30, 2012, and are processed before Aug. 1, 2013, will be subject to the current process and penalties.
Could this letter be for infractions before Oct. 30, 2012 and the 2nd letter be for after?
The telling thing will be if Tunsil is mentioned at all in this letter. If not - then a 2nd letter is almost guaranteed.
The only thing I've seen about another letter is this (http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2016/01/29/report-ole-miss-receives-notice-of-allegations/):
The NCAA opened up a second investigation last season following the news regarding Laremy Tunsil and his connection to a sports agent. That investigation was a separate incident and is not connected to this ongoing investigation, as far as anyone knows at this stage.
We'll see.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/college/2012/10/30/ncaa-enforcement-infractions-new-structure-penalties-mark-emmert/1668621/
The NCAA approved a new enforcement structure Tuesday that will dramatically change the way it punishes rules-breakers in college athletics.
The changes ? which take effect Aug. 1, 2013 ? mean coaches will be held more accountable for infractions that happen under their watch and could be penalized in a way that follows them if they change jobs....
....The NCAA said conduct breaches that occurred before Oct. 30, 2012, and are processed before Aug. 1, 2013, will be subject to the current process and penalties.
Could this letter be for infractions before Oct. 30, 2012 and the 2nd letter be for after?
The telling thing will be if Tunsil is mentioned at all in this letter. If not - then a 2nd letter is almost guaranteed.
The only thing I've seen about another letter is this (http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2016/01/29/report-ole-miss-receives-notice-of-allegations/):
The NCAA opened up a second investigation last season following the news regarding Laremy Tunsil and his connection to a sports agent. That investigation was a separate incident and is not connected to this ongoing investigation, as far as anyone knows at this stage.
We'll see.