PDA

View Full Version : Will there be any personnel changes for the LSU game?



ShotgunDawg
09-07-2015, 07:39 PM
I don't want this to turn into another "Favoritism" thread like the one taking place in the other thread, but was curious if you guys expect any personnel changes for the LSU game?

Here are the options:

Donald Gray (Where was he the other night?)

Branden Holloway (Is he really our #2 back?)

Corey Thomas (I expected to see him play against USM, but didn't)

Gerri Green (Did this guy take any meaningful snaps against USM? He seems like a perfect fit against LSU)

Malik Dear (Where does Josh Robinson's doppelganger fit in? Did he beat out Gray?)

Lee & Williams (Again, is Holloway really our #2 running back?)

msstate7
09-07-2015, 07:41 PM
Jt gray in place of Zach Jackson maybe. Jt is undersized though, so maybe not

HoopsDawg
09-07-2015, 07:53 PM
To answer your question, I don't expect any personnel changes.

Gray plays on the outside. He backs up Fred Brown and he played but wasn't targeted.

Cory Thomas not playing is a head scratcher. I thought he was our #4 DT, but apparently Dale is.

Mullen likes the Shumpert/Holloway duo.

msstate7
09-07-2015, 07:56 PM
Will Adams redshirt?

ShotgunDawg
09-07-2015, 07:59 PM
Mullen likes the Shumpert/Holloway duo.

This scares the crap out of me.

Holloway is like a left handed specialist reliever on a baseball team. I like Holloway, but you are in trouble when you start thinking your situational reliever is your set-up man. We need a real guy

Ralph
09-07-2015, 08:01 PM
delete

Todd4State
09-07-2015, 08:04 PM
To answer your question, I don't expect any personnel changes.
Gray plays on the outside. He backs up Fred Brown and he played but wasn't targeted.

Cory Thomas not playing is a head scratcher. I thought he was our #4 DT, but apparently Dale is.

Mullen likes the Shumpert/Holloway duo.

This would be my answer as well. No way Mullen was holding people back for LSU. If I had to guess what changes would be made other than the obvious Calhoun for Cleveland it would be Gray or Green for Zach Jackson. I still expect Zach to start though.

I think we were hoping to rotate guys through more against USM but we couldn't because we didn't have the ball much in the first half (thanks special teams) and the score was still in doubt (thanks Shumpert).

We'll be able to see more of what our guys can do against Northwestern State.

HoopsDawg
09-07-2015, 08:05 PM
Mullen likes having a feature back. He thinks Shump is that guy. Then he likes how Holloway is a complete change of pace to Shump. We just need Shump to run like he has in practice and like he did on his last carry vs USM.

HoopsDawg
09-07-2015, 08:10 PM
Will Adams redshirt?

Yes, more than likely the only true freshman that play are Dear, Johnson, Peters, Smitherman and McLaurin.

Todd4State
09-07-2015, 08:11 PM
This scares the crap out of me.

Holloway is like a left handed specialist reliever on a baseball team. I like Holloway, but you are in trouble when you start thinking your situational reliever is your set-up man. We need a real guy

We would be better with Shumpert, Lee, and Williams. But what scares the crap out of me is Holloway out rushing Shumpert against USM.

But Shumpert and Holloway as a duo doesn't surprise me based on Dan's track record. I was worried about it in the offseason.

I just hope that if Lee and/or Williams prove to be better than Shumpert and Holloway that we actually make a change.

msstate7
09-07-2015, 08:12 PM
Yes, more than likely the only true freshman that play are Dear, Johnson, Peters, Smitherman and McLaurin.

Has he been a little disappointing in practice? With dale playing dt, seems there would be some opportunity there

Todd4State
09-07-2015, 08:13 PM
Mullen likes having a feature back. He thinks Shump is that guy. Then he likes how Holloway is a complete change of pace to Shump. We just need Shump to run like he has in practice and like he did on his last carry vs USM.

I'm OK with Shumpert being the feature back if he performs. But what I don't want is Shumpert and Holloway splitting carries 50/50.

HoopsDawg
09-07-2015, 08:15 PM
Has he been a little disappointing in practice? With dale playing dt, seems there would be some opportunity there

No, he looks good. High motor, high effort guy. It's just tough for a true freshman to be physically ready to play DT unless he's a really special talent. Adams is a little undersized.

bulldawg28
09-07-2015, 08:15 PM
I would love to see Green with the Browns for the LB crew this week. B. Brown in the middle with Richie and Gerri outside seems ideal for LSU.

Todd4State
09-07-2015, 08:16 PM
Has he been a little disappointing in practice? With dale playing dt, seems there would be some opportunity there

With the way Jones and James looked, plus the older Adams brother who is a really good third DT to have- and then not to mention Dale, Thomas, and Hoyett- there may not really be that much opportunity for him than we may think.

So, redshirting and bulking him up this year is probably not that bad of an idea.

HoopsDawg
09-07-2015, 08:17 PM
I'm OK with Shumpert being the feature back if he performs. But what I don't want is Shumpert and Holloway splitting carries 50/50.

It won't be 50/50. It will be more like 80/20. Everyone needs to give Shump 1 more game before they write him off.

Homedawg
09-07-2015, 08:17 PM
I'm OK with Shumpert being the feature back if he performs. But what I don't want is Shumpert and Holloway splitting carries 50/50.

Base on the game I watched- I'd rather holloway carry it than shump. At least holloway can make an explosive play. Shump did nothing save one play in garbage time. I'd live for him to do well but he's not a feature back. Period. And yes I know holloway is t an every down back- but he offers something we don't have- a hr threat

Coach34
09-07-2015, 08:19 PM
We dont even like playing R-Fr...much less true Freshman. I'm not even sure McLaurin plays at this point. Corey Thomas not playing is head sratcher- as is Lee and Williams not getting some time. Gerri Green didnt play a meaningful snap Saturday. We have got to do a better job of getting talented R-Fr on f'ing field

HoopsDawg
09-07-2015, 08:19 PM
I would love to see Green with the Browns for the LB crew this week. B. Brown in the middle with Richie and Gerri outside seems ideal for LSU.

I always wonder why posters make posts like this. B. Brown is not moving to the middle. It's just not happening.

Coach34
09-07-2015, 08:21 PM
Base on the game I watched- I'd rather holloway carry it than shump. At least holloway can make an explosive play. Shump did nothing save one play in garbage time. I'd live for him to do well but he's not a feature back. Period. And yes I know holloway is t an every down back- but he offers something we don't have- a hr threat

agreed Homedawg. Lee and Williams are the future at RB- not Shump. I know Shump does all the little things- but running the rock is the main job. And he aint as good as the other 2 at that

msstate7
09-07-2015, 08:21 PM
Base on the game I watched- I'd rather holloway carry it than shump. At least holloway can make an explosive play. Shump did nothing save one play in garbage time. I'd live for him to do well but he's not a feature back. Period. And yes I know holloway is t an every down back- but he offers something we don't have- a hr threat

On the fumble play, didn't shump run between the tackles? Seemed we ran shump outside almost every carry, which isn't where he's best IMO. I also think shump will look better after Dak holds a few times on the zone read

Coach34
09-07-2015, 08:22 PM
I always wonder why posters make posts like this. B. Brown is not moving to the middle. It's just not happening.

Because when LSU is lined up in the Pro-I, this would be the best thing we could do defensively- whether we do it or not

HoopsDawg
09-07-2015, 08:25 PM
agreed Homedawg. Lee and Williams are the future at RB- not Shump. I know Shump does all the little things- but running the rock is the main job. And he aint as good as the other 2 at that

I don't think so. I don't see Lee or Williams ever being feature backs. Shump and Nick Gibson are going to be the guys until we get Kylin Hill ready.

msstate7
09-07-2015, 08:30 PM
I don't think so. I don't see Lee or Williams ever being feature backs. Shump and Nick Gibson are going to be the guys until we get Kylin Hill ready.

How's Gibson looking in practice?

Todd4State
09-07-2015, 08:30 PM
It won't be 50/50. It will be more like 80/20. Everyone needs to give Shump 1 more game before they write him off.

Especially considering how Shumpert looked at the end of the year. I think that fumble might have gotten into his head a little bit.

Bucky Dog
09-07-2015, 08:31 PM
I would love to see Green with the Browns for the LB crew this week. B. Brown in the middle with Richie and Gerri outside seems ideal for LSU.

Completely agree with this if with want to stop LF between the tackles. And put speed in the backfield.

Homedawg
09-07-2015, 08:32 PM
I don't think so. I don't see Lee or Williams ever being feature backs. Shump and Nick Gibson are going to be the guys until we get Kylin Hill ready.

If shump is out feature back our coaches will get to go recruiting early....

Todd4State
09-07-2015, 08:32 PM
We dont even like playing R-Fr...much less true Freshman. I'm not even sure McLaurin plays at this point. Corey Thomas not playing is head sratcher- as is Lee and Williams not getting some time. Gerri Green didnt play a meaningful snap Saturday. We have got to do a better job of getting talented R-Fr on f'ing field

AMEN

ShotgunDawg
09-07-2015, 08:32 PM
What am I missing about Lee?

Even his carry against USM looked "right". The guy has natural running skills & falls forward.

What his shortcoming?

Bucky Dog
09-07-2015, 08:32 PM
One more personnel change of note, I will be at this game after sitting out the first one!!!

HoopsDawg
09-07-2015, 08:43 PM
What am I missing about Lee?

Even his carry against USM looked "right". The guy has natural running skills & falls forward.

What his shortcoming?

burst/explosiveness

Homedawg
09-07-2015, 08:49 PM
burst/explosiveness

Good news is we already have a back that lacks, bursts, explosiveness and vision- and he starts. I agree he can pass block though.

msstate7
09-07-2015, 08:51 PM
I agree he can pass block though.

Since Dak is the franchise, this is no minor deal, right?

ShotgunDawg
09-07-2015, 08:51 PM
burst/explosiveness

Really?

That's exactly what I would have told you that he DOES HAVE after watching the Spring Game.

Coach34
09-07-2015, 08:54 PM
If shump is out feature back our coaches will get to go recruiting early....

I've seen enough to D-Lee to tell you he is better running the ball than Shump. I aint telling you what I think- I'm telling you what I know

HoopsDawg
09-07-2015, 08:54 PM
Good news is we already have a back that lacks, bursts, explosiveness and vision- and he starts. I agree he can pass block though.

Shump has more power than Lee. And Shump has some explosiveness, he's just not very shifty. Shump just needs to run North/South b/t the tackles.

Coach34
09-07-2015, 08:55 PM
What am I missing about Lee?

Even his carry against USM looked "right". The guy has natural running skills & falls forward.

What his shortcoming?

exactly- he exploded into the seam for 6 yards and his one carry looked better than Shump did all night

ShotgunDawg
09-07-2015, 09:02 PM
Shump has more power than Lee. And Shump has some explosiveness, he's just not very shifty. Shump just needs to run North/South b/t the tackles.

Sorry Hoop, I don't agree. I like Shump and think people are being a little hard on him here, but Lee appears to be the more natural runner to me.

Homedawg
09-07-2015, 09:03 PM
Shump has more power than Lee. And Shump has some explosiveness, he's just not very shifty. Shump just needs to run North/South b/t the tackles.

Hard to run between the tackles when you can't see the hole.

Homedawg
09-07-2015, 09:04 PM
Since Dak is the franchise, this is no minor deal, right?

Yea- someone needs to block. Pretty important- not saying it's minor, just that he's not a feature back carrying the ball. Not hard to see

HoopsDawg
09-07-2015, 09:08 PM
Sorry Hoop, I don't agree. I like Shump and think people are being a little hard on him here, but Lee appears to be the more natural runner to me.

It's cool. I hope I'm wrong and Lee ends up being the next great MSU back. I just don't see it. I don't love any of our backs to be honest.

archdog
09-07-2015, 09:25 PM
Hell I love all our backs. Seriously. Shump will find his grove in 5 days. Lee and Williams will get work too. Holloway needs to keep doing what he is doing. Nothing wrong with any of them.

archdog
09-07-2015, 09:28 PM
All I am saying is Shump looked like he couldn't grip the field. He needs to learn how to fight for every yard though. Guy fell down pretty easily and since he was running like he was on frozen concrete, it isn't easy to stay upright when you can't trust your footing. USM are a bunch of amatures including their turf.

maroonmania
09-07-2015, 09:29 PM
Sorry Hoop, I don't agree. I like Shump and think people are being a little hard on him here, but Lee appears to be the more natural runner to me.

Yep, believe Hoop is on an island with that opinion. Shump as our feature back IMO is going to make our running game even more pedestrian than it was when Perkins was the guy. Lee or Williams either one offer more potential.

ShotgunDawg
09-07-2015, 09:35 PM
Yep, believe Hoop is on an island with that opinion. Shump as our feature back IMO is going to make our running game even more pedestrian than it was when Perkins was the guy. Lee or Williams either one offer more potential.

I'm going to disagree slightly. At least with Shump, you have the option of just pounding it up the middle & going 3 yards & a cloud of dust. That IMO is better than the Perkins run game in which we were trying to run outside with a slow player.

To me, while I don't believe Shumpert is as natural of a runner as Lee, he does have a high floor in that we can just pound it with him.

fishwater99
09-07-2015, 09:38 PM
We need to play Shump as a FB with Lee or Williams at TB.
Shumpert just isn't a feature SEC back.

GreenheadDawg
09-07-2015, 09:41 PM
burst/explosiveness

And you think shumpert has that?

CadaverDawg
09-07-2015, 10:13 PM
I'm with Hoops and arch. I still believe in Shump. But I like Lee too.

We're going to all wish Holloway didn't have such a big game Saturday, when he's getting decapitated at key moments of the game vs LSU this weekend. He'll get a bunch of carries Bc he played so well vs Southern...that ain't good.

ShotgunDawg
09-07-2015, 10:20 PM
I'm with Hoops and arch. I still believe in Shump. But I like Lee too.

We're going to all wish Holloway didn't have such a big game Saturday, when he's getting decapitated at key moments of the game vs LSU this weekend. He'll get a bunch of carries Bc he played so well vs Southern...that ain't good.

YUP. I loved the kickoff return but cringed at the long term consequences of it

TaleofTwoDogs
09-07-2015, 11:30 PM
Shump has more power than Lee. And Shump has some explosiveness, he's just not very shifty. Shump just needs to run North/South b/t the tackles.

Agree that Shump needs to run north & south. When he runs east & west his center of gravity makes him easy to be brought down if he doesn't square to the point of attack in time. At 6'2" his CoG is much higher than JRob and can be taken down much easier.

cheewgumm
09-08-2015, 12:13 AM
I think we're one more fumble away from seeing a lot of somebody.

I hope Shump does great. But you can't fumble. Mullen hates that . Ask that guy that went to Mcneese.

Todd4State
09-08-2015, 12:24 AM
I think we're one more fumble away from seeing a lot of somebody.

I hope Shump does great. But you can't fumble. Mullen hates that . Ask that guy that went to Mcneese.

Unfortunately that someone is probably Holloway.

Bothrops
09-08-2015, 01:02 AM
Lee is better than Shump. He pushed the pile in the spring game and has more speed, plain and simple. Aeris has the most speed of the three, but lacks punch. He's more effective in space.

But if we don't start rotating Lee and Williams in early Saturday, we are limiting our offense. If we want to win Saturday, Dak is going to have run the ball like he did in last year's game. Dak's feet are the key to establishing the passing game, and screwing up their defense. That will be the only way we can outscore LSU. If Dak stands in the pocket, I think we lose big.

Dawg61
09-08-2015, 08:12 AM
Unfortunately that someone is probably Holloway.

Mullen already showed it'll be Dear.

ShotgunDawg
09-08-2015, 09:44 AM
Bob Carskadon ‏@bobcarskadon 2m2 minutes ago
Leftover nugget: Mullen told us more true freshmen will likely play. S Mark McLaurin and CB Maurice Smitherman mentioned specifically.

dawgwood
09-08-2015, 09:54 AM
To answer your question, I don't expect any personnel changes.

Gray plays on the outside. He backs up Fred Brown and he played but wasn't targeted.

Cory Thomas not playing is a head scratcher. I thought he was our #4 DT, but apparently Dale is.

Mullen likes the Shumpert/Holloway duo.
Once Dak open up so will the running game. But Lord please don't let torrey Dale take a snap.

msstate7
09-08-2015, 10:07 AM
Bob Carskadon ‏@bobcarskadon 2m2 minutes ago
Leftover nugget: Mullen told us more true freshmen will likely play. S Mark McLaurin and CB Maurice Smitherman mentioned specifically.
Wish they had played last week

Dental Dawg33
09-08-2015, 10:24 AM
Hell I love all our backs. Seriously. Shump will find his grove in 5 days. Lee and Williams will get work too. Holloway needs to keep doing what he is doing. Nothing wrong with any of them.

^this

BoomBoom
09-08-2015, 10:29 AM
Mullen likes having a feature back. He thinks Shump is that guy. Then he likes how Holloway is a complete change of pace to Shump. We just need Shump to run like he has in practice and like he did on his last carry vs USM.

The problem there is Holloway up the middle for no gain is not a change of pace. Trying to stretch to the outside, even if you dont make it, is a change of pace that may open up the middle on a read play. But against USM we were sending Shump wide and Holloway up the middle.

HancockCountyDog
09-08-2015, 10:33 AM
Especially considering how Shumpert looked at the end of the year. I think that fumble might have gotten into his head a little bit.

I've never seen so many people make a big deal out of so few carries.

maroonmania
09-08-2015, 12:38 PM
I'm going to disagree slightly. At least with Shump, you have the option of just pounding it up the middle & going 3 yards & a cloud of dust. That IMO is better than the Perkins run game in which we were trying to run outside with a slow player.

To me, while I don't believe Shumpert is as natural of a runner as Lee, he does have a high floor in that we can just pound it with him.

Well, Shump obviously has more power and size than Perkins but Perkins had more speed and better balance. Pretty much a wash in my book. Power backs don't need to fall over at the first hint of contact. I'm still waiting for Shump to show me he can break a tackle.

Maroons
09-08-2015, 01:09 PM
Lee is better than Shump. He pushed the pile in the spring game and has more speed, plain and simple. Aeris has the most speed of the three, but lacks punch. He's more effective in space.

But if we don't start rotating Lee and Williams in early Saturday, we are limiting our offense. If we want to win Saturday, Dak is going to have run the ball like he did in last year's game. Dak's feet are the key to establishing the passing game, and screwing up their defense. That will be the only way we can outscore LSU. If Dak stands in the pocket, I think we lose big.

Completely wrong about AW lacking punch.

Maroons
09-08-2015, 01:12 PM
I don't think so. I don't see Lee or Williams ever being feature backs. Shump and Nick Gibson are going to be the guys until we get Kylin Hill ready.

How in the world can you say that when the two RFr RB's have gotten one carry apiece?

smootness
09-08-2015, 01:14 PM
I'm OK with Shumpert being the feature back if he performs. But what I don't want is Shumpert and Holloway splitting carries 50/50.

Why would this be a concern? We always use Holloway a good bit against bad teams and dial him back against good competition.

Holloway will probably get 4-5 touches against LSU, and I would guess we'll see either Williams or Lee get more carries.

DancingRabbit
09-08-2015, 01:37 PM
Completely wrong about AW lacking punch.

Obviously small sample size, but on one play in the spring game he ran into a DB (seems like it was Jiles), and it was like he ran into a brick wall. AW went backwards.

smootness
09-08-2015, 01:41 PM
Obviously small sample size, but on one play in the spring game he ran into a DB (seems like it was Jiles), and it was like he ran into a brick wall. AW went backwards.

That's literally the smallest of sample sizes.

He ran like a truck in HS; similar style to Shumpert.

Barking 13
09-08-2015, 03:09 PM
I rewatched the game last night, and slo-mo'ed the carry where Shump got sacked... Warren pulled and Walley missed the DE, so that was not all on Shump. There were a couple other missed assignments as well.

the59dawg
09-08-2015, 05:43 PM
I'm OK with Shumpert being the feature back if he performs. But what I don't want is Shumpert and Holloway splitting carries 50/50.
I think the best way to utilize Holloway is as the second back in backfield. That way the assignments require more thinking by the defense. Auburn's running game was awesome with the multiple backs, sometimes 4. Similar to what OK St put on us a couple yrs ago with 4 backs.

MabenMaroon
09-08-2015, 08:12 PM
I will defer to the MSU coaching staff, the same coaching staff that guided a bunch of 2* & 3*'s to seven weeks at #1 in the 17* nation and a 10-3 overall record. That same coaching staff is now dealing with 3*/4*'s, with which many of whom were integral in that feat and are quite perturbed about how the season ended.
This coaching staff has shown that it knows how to build a program and win in this league. The running back situation will work itself out as well as the other position groups. Nobody on this board wants to win more than the guys wearing the helmets and pads and the coaches who are teaching them and leading them. I also trust this staff to know what is the best combination of players to do just that. Last year WAS NOT A FLUKE and is just the beginning of some unprecedented things to come for this school and its fans. The one common thing that all of our opponents coaches and the serious big boys media have said about Coach Mullen, is that he is a very intelligent young coach.