Pokerdawg44
12-20-2014, 08:01 AM
Stolen from another board
http://time.com/3640357/college-football-top-25-academic/ Rankings (Academically - only applied towards teams in the Top 25 of the playoff poll):*
#1 TCU*
#2 UCLA*
#3 Alabama*
#4 Clemson*
#5 Arizona St*
#6 Ohio St*
#7 Georgia*
#8 Utah*
#9 Arizona*
#10 KSU*
#11 Auburn*
#12 Louisville*
#13 Mississippi State*
#14 Oregon*
#15 Mizzou*
#16 Baylor*
#17 Georgia Tech*
#18 LSU*
#19 Michigan State*
#20 Wisconsin*
#21 Minnesota*
#22 Florida State*
#23 Boise St*
#24 Ole Miss*
#25 USC*
Methodology used:*
quote:
To compile the rankings, New America started with each school?s football graduation success rate (GSR). The GSR is an NCAA metric that, unlike the federal graduation rate, doesn?t penalize schools for having players who transfer or leave for the pros?as long as those players depart in good academic standing. The higher the school?s graduation success rate, the higher they start out in New America?s rankings.*
But New America penalized schools for graduating football players at different rates than the overall male student body at the school. To compare players to students, New America relied on federal rates, since there?s no GSR for the general population. The bigger the discrepancy, the harsher the penalty. It?s important to note that even if a school graduated football players at higher rates than the overall male student population ? four schools in the top 25, TCU, Arizona State, Arizona, and Boise State, did so ? the difference was counted as a penalty. Why? ?We were not going to reward schools with really low overall graduation rates,? says Holt. In fact, schools got an added bonus for having high overall rates.*
TCU, for example, has a 77% federal graduation rate for football players, and a 73% federal graduation rate for all male students. This four point difference is relatively minor. But Boise St. has a 70% football graduation rate, and a 31% graduation rate for all the male students. The low overall rate hurts the school tremendously in these rankings: despite a strong 85% graduation success rate for football players, Boise State fell to 24th in these rankings.
http://time.com/3640357/college-football-top-25-academic/ Rankings (Academically - only applied towards teams in the Top 25 of the playoff poll):*
#1 TCU*
#2 UCLA*
#3 Alabama*
#4 Clemson*
#5 Arizona St*
#6 Ohio St*
#7 Georgia*
#8 Utah*
#9 Arizona*
#10 KSU*
#11 Auburn*
#12 Louisville*
#13 Mississippi State*
#14 Oregon*
#15 Mizzou*
#16 Baylor*
#17 Georgia Tech*
#18 LSU*
#19 Michigan State*
#20 Wisconsin*
#21 Minnesota*
#22 Florida State*
#23 Boise St*
#24 Ole Miss*
#25 USC*
Methodology used:*
quote:
To compile the rankings, New America started with each school?s football graduation success rate (GSR). The GSR is an NCAA metric that, unlike the federal graduation rate, doesn?t penalize schools for having players who transfer or leave for the pros?as long as those players depart in good academic standing. The higher the school?s graduation success rate, the higher they start out in New America?s rankings.*
But New America penalized schools for graduating football players at different rates than the overall male student body at the school. To compare players to students, New America relied on federal rates, since there?s no GSR for the general population. The bigger the discrepancy, the harsher the penalty. It?s important to note that even if a school graduated football players at higher rates than the overall male student population ? four schools in the top 25, TCU, Arizona State, Arizona, and Boise State, did so ? the difference was counted as a penalty. Why? ?We were not going to reward schools with really low overall graduation rates,? says Holt. In fact, schools got an added bonus for having high overall rates.*
TCU, for example, has a 77% federal graduation rate for football players, and a 73% federal graduation rate for all male students. This four point difference is relatively minor. But Boise St. has a 70% football graduation rate, and a 31% graduation rate for all the male students. The low overall rate hurts the school tremendously in these rankings: despite a strong 85% graduation success rate for football players, Boise State fell to 24th in these rankings.