This does not make sense

[1bigdawg]

Dak Prescott should not be the holder for FGs and EPs.

1. We obviously need more practice reps at this and the starting QB has to practice with the offense.

2. He could get hurt.

3. A walk on QB should be able to do the job just as well or better because of more reps and also be a threat to fake.

[Political Hack]

agree. although it's likely too late to change now.

[TheRef]

I'm sure what they do is have the kickers be held by all of the QBs and whichever one they feel best with is the holder.

[SheltonChoked]

I'd rather see a wr holding. Let Myles or another for wr hold.

[Political Hack]

I'd rather see Dicenzo Miller hold.

I like a QB holding for the fake possibility. They line up in a "go for 2" formation every time and make a team spend time practicing for that each week. The more stupid crap you can do like that, the more stupid crap the other team has to prep for.

[aerodawg]

This is exactly what they did and they chose Dak.

That one attempt last night wasn't indicative of anything going forward. Wet field, meh snap, and slight mishandled by Dak screwed up the timing for a 40 yard field goal. That's not a chipshot. I have talked shit about every kicker we have had dating back to Carlson in 2007, but I place little to no blame on Graves for that miss last night. Not saying we won't completely suck, just that nothing can be inferred from that one attempt.

[smootness]

Why shouldn't he be? He seems good at it and has been doing it for a while now. The kickers are comfortable with him holding, and he knows what he's doing.

I can't remember ever seeing a holder get hurt in the history of watching football.

[hailmari]

I'd rather see Dicenzo Miller hold.

I like a QB holding for the fake possibility. They line up in a "go for 2" formation every time and make a team spend time practicing for that each week. The more stupid crap you can do like that, the more stupid crap the other team has to prep for.

I love the way you worded that last sentence. Spot on.